Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines
View Poll Results: Approve a mutual training swap?
Mutual training trades are harmless, I would never block one
65
90.28%
It endangers my seniority so I would block it
5
6.94%
I would reluctantly approve
2
2.78%
Voters: 72. You may not vote on this poll

FDX - training trade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2015, 09:26 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
NoHaz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: let it snow, let it snow, let it snow
Posts: 829
Default FDX - training trade

Got a bit of a philosophical scrap going on

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1114...17536/?fref=nf
NoHaz is offline  
Old 06-28-2015, 06:48 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Walrus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Socket Drawer
Posts: 1,797
Default

Must have been deleted.
The Walrus is offline  
Old 06-28-2015, 10:58 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: MD11FO
Posts: 213
Default

This may or may not shed some light on one reasonable reason to block a training swap.

A few years ago I approved a training swap. For the uninformed reader, the result is someone junior to me moved to a training slot earlier than mine and someone senior to me moved to a slot after mine. I was happy with my training date and was very happy to help others swap slots.

Here is where things get interesting. Shortly after the swap the training letter disappeared for a few days and a new training letter came out with new dates. The junior pilot was still ahead of me and now all of a sudden so was the senior pilot. My training date was now delayed for one month. As I waived passover pay when I approved the swap the company had no reason to move the junior pilot behind me. The senior pilot is always going to be senior to me and so moving him ahead of me is totally copacetic (even though it wasn't what he wanted). So now that senior pilot has my old training date and I'm delayed one month. No big deal except that I now have the second to last training date before training stops for 3 months because of peak. Now I don't mind a one month delay but a four month delay... that doesn't work for a number of reasons beyond the scope of this explanation.

So pretty soon after the new training letter comes out I get an email asking for another training swap approval. Not surprisingly the senior pilot still wants a later date. He didn't want to get moved earlier but that is what the company chose to do because other names where added to the letter that probably would have generated passover pay for him.

This time I apologized but said no. He was very polite but also persistent so the discussion continued for a few days during which the company changed the training letter again moving me to the last slot before the long break. I apologized again but refused.

My only motivation was wanting to go to training +/- six weeks of my slot.
CargoCan is offline  
Old 06-28-2015, 11:17 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by CargoCan View Post
This may or may not shed some light on one reasonable reason to block a training swap.

A few years ago I approved a training swap. For the uninformed reader, the result is someone junior to me moved to a training slot earlier than mine and someone senior to me moved to a slot after mine. I was happy with my training date and was very happy to help others swap slots.

Here is where things get interesting. Shortly after the swap the training letter disappeared for a few days and a new training letter came out with new dates. The junior pilot was still ahead of me and now all of a sudden so was the senior pilot. My training date was now delayed for one month. As I waived passover pay when I approved the swap the company had no reason to move the junior pilot behind me. The senior pilot is always going to be senior to me and so moving him ahead of me is totally copacetic (even though it wasn't what he wanted). So now that senior pilot has my old training date and I'm delayed one month. No big deal except that I now have the second to last training date before training stops for 3 months because of peak. Now I don't mind a one month delay but a four month delay... that doesn't work for a number of reasons beyond the scope of this explanation.

So pretty soon after the new training letter comes out I get an email asking for another training swap approval. Not surprisingly the senior pilot still wants a later date. He didn't want to get moved earlier but that is what the company chose to do because other names where added to the letter that probably would have generated passover pay for him.

This time I apologized but said no. He was very polite but also persistent so the discussion continued for a few days during which the company changed the training letter again moving me to the last slot before the long break. I apologized again but refused.

My only motivation was wanting to go to training +/- six weeks of my slot.
So, where do you think you'd have been on the new training letter, had you not approved their trade? One slot higher?
Busboy is offline  
Old 06-28-2015, 11:25 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Walrus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Socket Drawer
Posts: 1,797
Default

If I had brought an umbrella then it wouldn't have rained.
The Walrus is offline  
Old 06-28-2015, 12:36 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by The Walrus View Post
If I had brought an umbrella then it wouldn't have rained.
It is not a problem for me, I only go to trading when I am in the top 10 for upgrades, but the way the company games the lists I can't blame him. You only get burned once if you are smart. Want someone to blame, FDX ALPA has put up with this system for at least 20 years.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 06-28-2015, 12:46 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Check 6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 777
Posts: 866
Default

I'm more of the mind of blaming the CO. Blame ALPA if you must, but still can't see denying a fellow crew member a trade....

It's like denying a JS because it's inconvenient
Check 6 is offline  
Old 06-28-2015, 01:08 PM
  #8  
Proponent of Hysteria
 
FXDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 3B
Posts: 1,052
Default

I would like to hear any valid opinions on the possible downside of approving a trade. I for the life of me can not come up with any on my own, and feel that approving a trade is a simple no brainer solid that you ought to do for a fellow pilot.

We have no control over when we are "selected" to attend training. If you are pretty senior on the practice bid you should assume that you are going pretty quickly, but that isn't even cast in stone. The company has shown again and again that they will train in ANY order and then simply make up for it with passover pay as appropriate. My Airbus training slot change numerous times years ago, and with bids this big there is no way you are guaranteed to keep your original date, even without swaps. CargoCan could and probably would have had several date changes without the swap.

Our contract sucks in regard to ITU training. Allowing swaps is the only way to allow our fellow pilots to have the slightest control over their life once they take the initiative to bid a new seat, and I can't imagine taking that little bit of control away from them. It costs you nothing, and if the money is so important to you then go get your own swap.

Imagine if you had to get everybody's approval to do a trip trade? Same concept on a smaller scale. In my opinion swaps should be automatic (if the company approves, which they don't even always do).

Unless and until we negotiate to bid for ITU training we are just hurting ourselves by not allowing our fellow pilots to swap.
FXDX is offline  
Old 06-28-2015, 05:30 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: MD11FO
Posts: 213
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy View Post
So, where do you think you'd have been on the new training letter, had you not approved their trade? One slot higher?
Did you read my post? I reread it to make sure it was reasonably clear.

The company can and will reshuffle the training letter at any time. They can always move someone senior back in front and in some cases will do so to prevent passover pay. Once you waive passover it is waived even if a new letter is published. Thinking that approving a swap is a zero sum transaction may or may not be true. I wasn't willing to risk losing a November slot for a February slot. Could it have happened anyway? Maybe, but I wasn't willing to be the one who made it a more likely scenario.

It had nothing to do with me going to training any sooner. It was about going to training within a reasonable time frame of when I expected to go. It was about not sabotaging myself.
CargoCan is offline  
Old 06-28-2015, 08:21 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Walrus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Socket Drawer
Posts: 1,797
Default

If you approve a trade, you are waving passover associated with that trade. You are not waving passover from any other passover situation where the company decides to train a junior pilot in front of you. The only person giving that up is the senior pilot that is wanting to move backwards.
The Walrus is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
jsled
United
232
07-24-2016 09:34 AM
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
magicrat
Cargo
8
05-22-2014 04:42 AM
ChillBillPilot
Major
32
10-09-2008 04:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices