Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX Safety reports

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2007 | 08:26 PM
  #11  
Trash Hauler 1's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Default

121.5 Navy common

TH1
Reply
Old 02-12-2007 | 11:39 PM
  #12  
cma2407's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Row well and live...
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC
In my opinion, the whole system of Safety Reports is worthless to the pilots. I accomplish them only when necessary, and include only the bare minimum of information....


.
What, you don't play "true confessions" on your safety reports? They do make for entertaining reading sometimes, but I figure if you feel the need to spill your guts...get a dog.
Reply
Old 02-13-2007 | 03:18 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,535
Likes: 0
From: 1559
Default

"I woke up early and had a coffee with two creams and one sugar. The limo showed up late and the driver ran a red light. He felt it was yellow. We got the paper work and hurried to the aircraft. Preflight was normal and we blocked out on time, but I felt very rushed. After the F/O's outstanding takeoff I realized that he had forgot (insert trivial item here). I strongly feel that we should've caught that much earlier. The F/O seemed distracted and his attitude didn't appear to reflect the seriousness of this situation. In the interest of safety FedEx needs to add a three page checklist to ensure this never happens again. At the end of the flight during debrief, I realized I had lost my lucky pen, which I feel contributed to this incident."

As an aside, do you wonder what some of the reports that they don't publish must sound like?
Reply
Old 02-13-2007 | 03:48 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Originally Posted by MX727
That was a classic.

Remember the guy who didn't think that it was appropriate for the F/O to show up at show time? He wanted everyone to come in 30 minutes early.

Between reading safety reports and listening to 131.92 (the comedy channel) you should get quite a few laughs.
Yeah, these self-induced "safety reports" are a real joke. However, sometimes, during a long boring flight,when you've finished with your playboy or hustler and there's nothing else to read, they hit the spot. Really, why anyone would fill out a report because they were stupid, is well.... just plain stupid. After all, what's to be learned from someone telling us that he was distracted and had a runway incursion, or that he missed the correct taxiway. What are those guys thinking? Do they actually think that if they turn themselves in, that the company will somehow come to their aid. They had better think again, because it'll never happen. In fact, the company could take that information and start trending that (those) guys. Safety reports should be about just that: safety. Not stupidity. There's nothing to be learned from you telling me that you busted an altitude or forgot to pull it back to below 250K below 10. We all know that stuff. Tell me about the fact that when the control wheel is 5 degrees left of center, while the jet is in a 4 degree nose-low attitude, that actuating the speedbrakes, flips the jet over. Now that would be a good thing to know, don't you think? The dumb stuff, keep to yourself and if need be, go to confession.

As for the captain wanting the crew to show up at a different time, as opposed to the actual check-in time, well, according to the FOM, he has that right. Hopefully, he'd also have enough CRM skills to let everyone know in advance and have a good reason for doing so. I think it's much less important domestically, but overseas, in say, Seoul, he might be thinking of the very long drive and just wants to make sure they don't run late. Sometimes having been there and done that gives one a perspective that might not be shared or understood by guys who have not had those experiences.

Last edited by Jetjok; 02-13-2007 at 03:57 AM.
Reply
Old 02-13-2007 | 04:29 AM
  #15  
USMCFDX's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Default

I have stopped reading them. When they forward items like the NAV light that was lost in flight, and the previously mentioned worthless reports they become usless to me. Send out the ones that really matter, like MX issues so we can know what is going on wwith the fleet.

To me the system is broken and they are not worth my time to read them.
Reply
Old 02-13-2007 | 04:35 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Default

Funny thing, guys use Flight Safety Reports for everything. Notice the replies from Flight Safety telling them to file the appropriate report. I can only imagine how many they get- they don't publish all of them. And when you put in how great your f/o was? They don't know him, they don't care, and all that gets deleted in Flight Safety anyway. Your f/o won't be getting a BZ for it.
Reply
Old 02-13-2007 | 05:07 AM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: A300 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok
As for the captain wanting the crew to show up at a different time, as opposed to the actual check-in time, well, according to the FOM, he has that right. Hopefully, he'd also have enough CRM skills to let everyone know in advance and have a good reason for doing so. I think it's much less important domestically, but overseas, in say, Seoul, he might be thinking of the very long drive and just wants to make sure they don't run late. Sometimes having been there and done that gives one a perspective that might not be shared or understood by guys who have not had those experiences.
He may have the right, but again this is stupid and does not fix the heart of the problem. Show up on time and block out late enough times and the powers that be will fix the problem and PAY us. I know of the argument that if we complain about transport times then we will be staying at the airport, but when enough guys grow balls and go fatigued because of inadequate rest the problem will be addressed again. Pilots here go above and beyond every day, but at best it gets you a pretty little pin. I returned my last BZ to my acp and told him to send it back when there was a check attached to it like the old days. SHOW ME THE MONEY!
Reply
Old 02-13-2007 | 06:39 AM
  #18  
SNAFU
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think the implication from the Captain was that the other guy should show up ahead of him to get things done and the Captain could review. Well that is fine if the FO gets paid to show up a half hour early and starts his duty day a half hour before the Captain.

Now, if in the middle of a trip and the Captain decides that the entire crew should show up early, then so be it. But I don't think that was the message in the FSR that was being talked about.
Reply
Old 02-13-2007 | 06:54 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Originally Posted by SNAFU
I think the implication from the Captain was that the other guy should show up ahead of him to get things done and the Captain could review.
That's just Bull Sh!t. Another of our 2% captains.
Reply
Old 02-13-2007 | 06:55 AM
  #20  
A300jetflyer's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: MD10/11 Capt
Default Flight Safety Report

My friend with the local gestapo, (KMEM FSDO), a former legacy carrier big jet driver can't believe we do this to ourselves. Yes, they do see them, but they are sanitized. His recommendation is to comply with the FOM, and nothing more. NASA is for the rest.

I couldn't agree more!

https://akama.arc.nasa.gov/asrs_ers/...GENERAL_1a.pdf
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoro
Cargo
32
07-26-2012 06:32 AM
RockBottom
Major
3
01-03-2007 03:46 PM
miker1369
Major
0
08-20-2006 08:26 AM
AUS_ATC
Hangar Talk
0
03-08-2006 06:56 PM
CRM1337
Major
1
10-02-2005 07:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices