Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Corporate
Any chyenne 2 or 3 experience >

Any chyenne 2 or 3 experience

Search
Notices
Corporate Corporate operators

Any chyenne 2 or 3 experience

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2007, 07:05 AM
  #1  
Gets Paid Vacation
Thread Starter
 
Sbaker1595's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: King Air 200, PA-31P-350 Mojave, Bellanca 17-30A Super Viking
Posts: 192
Default Any chyenne 2 or 3 experience

yo im new around here so first of saying hi, second off i currently work for a company out for fort worth flying a pa-31p-350 mojave.....its not a bad ride but this thing is a maintence hog piper only made like 50 of these things for one year so finding parts is a B*$^#...its always down and we miss trips constantly.....im working on the bossman right now to upgrade to a cheyenne, but hes afraid the operating costs of turbines will be too much, he previously owned a king air so he knows a bit about turbine ownership.....my question is how much more are we talking in operating costs and how should i go about this proposal??
Sbaker1595 is offline  
Old 05-02-2007, 07:20 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
cub pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: J3 to CL600; retired doing instrument taining
Posts: 78
Default "NoHave"

Contact me, I have operated Cheyennes extensively. An engineer retired from Piper Lock Haven told me that they called the Mojave by the surname of "NoHave".....No Have any performance. Of all the models, the Cheyenne I is the best airplane from a cost standopoint to operate. Cub pilot
cub pilot is offline  
Old 05-02-2007, 08:19 AM
  #3  
Gets Paid Vacation
Thread Starter
 
Sbaker1595's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: King Air 200, PA-31P-350 Mojave, Bellanca 17-30A Super Viking
Posts: 192
Default

well from what ive been able to tell the best bang for the buck is to stick it out on the initial purchase price a bit and get the 3, its big and decently fast.....and your only talking about 100-200K difference between the 1A 2 and 3 fuel consumption is obviously going to be higher but you make up for that with speed......as far as the Slojave goes, i pray i never lose an engine after rotation on a hot day at max weight because theres no climbing with that thing...its anemic
Sbaker1595 is offline  
Old 05-02-2007, 02:47 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
aero550's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Citation II
Posts: 315
Default

Originally Posted by Sbaker1595 View Post
......as far as the Slojave goes, i pray i never lose an engine after rotation on a hot day at max weight because theres no climbing with that thing...its anemic
Ha - I used to fly a Mojave. Can't be that many of us around. It was a nice comfy airplane with all the toys, but what a slug of a performer. I was also deathly afraid of an engine failure. We also had PA31-350 Navajos and I had to convince dispatch more than once to swap trips on the airplanes because they were trying to get the Mojave to do something it couldn't comfortably do, like short runway, hot day, with obstacles, with 5 pax.
aero550 is offline  
Old 05-02-2007, 03:07 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 397
Default

I'd stay away from the PA-42 (chey 3). They didn't make many III or IIIA's. Parts are hard to find, there are very few STC's (no freon air, just an ACM, ie it's HOT in the summer), and the useful load on a III is pretty limited if you put fuel on. The 3's w&b is interesting as it it VERY aft heavy and often times you'll have the door hit the ground if you've got some luggage and two people near the back, and no one in the front.

There are also some mods for the I & II to put bigger engines and you'd have a real hot rod.
FDX28 is offline  
Old 05-02-2007, 03:44 PM
  #6  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

Personally, I like the ramp "Authority" a 4LS has with those mighty props just looking for something to chop up.

But on the issue at hand, my company was looking at the Dash-10 powered Conquest II's. Almost bought it, but a person approached my boss for a partnership in something else, and we dropped interest. Still wish we would've gotten one, but our other option is much nicer too
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 05-02-2007, 04:06 PM
  #7  
Gets Paid Vacation
Thread Starter
 
Sbaker1595's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: King Air 200, PA-31P-350 Mojave, Bellanca 17-30A Super Viking
Posts: 192
Default

those -10's make for a fast mutha but it definatley sucks when your paying for hot section inspections
Sbaker1595 is offline  
Old 05-04-2007, 04:51 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Formerbuspilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Corporate
Posts: 220
Default

Originally Posted by FDX28 View Post
I'd stay away from the PA-42 (chey 3). They didn't make many III or IIIA's. Parts are hard to find, there are very few STC's (no freon air, just an ACM, ie it's HOT in the summer), and the useful load on a III is pretty limited if you put fuel on. The 3's w&b is interesting as it it VERY aft heavy and often times you'll have the door hit the ground if you've got some luggage and two people near the back, and no one in the front.
All very true. Currently flying a III and it works well with 4 people, but add a 5th and the CG does get interesting, 6th and you definately need that person in the front. My problem is we have a freon air conditioner that was installed and the compressor and other componets are in the nose baggage compartment rendering it useless for baggage to offset the aft cargo area.

The III is expensive to operate...burns 600(high alt)-800(low alt) pph. We are currently using Cheyenne Air Service in Washington, PA for event inspections and each is running around 15-20K. It doesnt need much between inspections so that puts mx and parts at $150-$200 per hour. I fly the plane 3.5-4 hours to visit the C.A.S. shop and find it well worth it, they know their stuff concerning the Cheyenne family.

If you are considering a plane of this size and speed (6-8 pax, 270 kts) look hard at the KingAir B200. A whole lot more to choose from and my understanding is CG is rarely a problem.
Formerbuspilot is offline  
Old 05-04-2007, 10:36 AM
  #9  
Gets Paid Vacation
Thread Starter
 
Sbaker1595's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: King Air 200, PA-31P-350 Mojave, Bellanca 17-30A Super Viking
Posts: 192
Default

weve had kingairs before, great plane, and the b200 would be perfect, but unfortunatley the damn things never lose their value....the initial aquisiton cost is just too high.....1.5mil for a plane made in the mid 70's?? its crazy...........i know of one charter operation outa philly that runs cheyenne 3's and all they do is praise them, but that is alot of jet a to be burning!
Sbaker1595 is offline  
Old 05-04-2007, 12:53 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 397
Default

Originally Posted by Formerbuspilot View Post
My problem is we have a freon air conditioner that was installed and the compressor and other componets are in the nose baggage compartment rendering it useless for baggage to offset the aft cargo area.

The III is expensive to operate...burns 600(high alt)-800(low alt) pph. We are currently using Cheyenne Air Service in Washington, PA for event inspections and each is running around 15-20K.
Who installed the freon a/c? I looked for a real A/c unit but was never able to find one when I was flying a III. Is Craig still up at CAS?
FDX28 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
B Swinney
Major
105
02-19-2007 08:03 AM
swimbody
Corporate
3
01-12-2007 04:26 AM
liberty2007
Cargo
4
12-31-2006 07:28 PM
CL65driver
Regional
4
09-05-2006 05:13 PM
AUS_ATC
Hangar Talk
4
04-15-2006 07:03 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices