Flight safety
07-05-2007 | 04:13 AM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Citation II
That's a tough one. Both are a little long in the tooth. I'd bet, though, that there are and will continue to be more Lear 35's running around for a few years than Falcon 20's, making the Lear type more useful for a longer period of time.
Those Falcon 20's are tough to resist, though, especially the re-engined, re-cockpitted ones.
Which one pays more right now? Which one offers the quicker upgrade (if starting as SIC)?
Those Falcon 20's are tough to resist, though, especially the re-engined, re-cockpitted ones.
Which one pays more right now? Which one offers the quicker upgrade (if starting as SIC)?
07-05-2007 | 07:10 AM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Citation II
07-05-2007 | 12:16 PM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: E170 FO
IIRC, the Lear 35 type buys you access to 31's as well. The pre 40 series Lears are all pretty similar too. I used to work for a company that flew a 35 and 55. I want to say they did training for them at the same time. Long time ago though, too much beer since then.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
