Single engine taxi
#12
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Yes, I understand range still plays a part also, clearly.
#13
Yeah, I understand saving fuel, ex-Eastern Airlines, but saving a few bucks on fuel isn't in the corporate program. Besides, when we only fly a plane 400 hours a year, the savings are much less. It isn't like an airline where the plane spends a considerable percentage of its time on the ground taxiing. If a bizje spends 12 minutes taxiing per day, it is a normal.
GF
GF
#14
The ONLY time I ever single-engine taxi is when I'm on an FBO ramp, pulling in to park, and there are passengers boarding/deplaning on either side of me; in that instance I'll often shut the same side engine down as a courtesy so they don't have to deal with the noise.
Besides, I can save FAR more fuel by how I fly the airplane than I could ever save with SE taxi.
Besides, I can save FAR more fuel by how I fly the airplane than I could ever save with SE taxi.
#16
Are we there yet??!!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Used to taxi a Metro on a single engine from time to time. It was a PITA but doable. I think I even remember taxiing a BE-200 on one. No tiller on either one.
#17
Tried it with a C310 once, was a royal pain. I could see it being ok in some jets, but as mentioned above, not worth the fuel savings in the corp market since it's just not an issue like in the airlines.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
CJ4 has single engine taxi (and start up of the other engine just prior to T/O) built into the checklists - so Cessna can sell it as a "green" jet: fewer carbons spewed forth with all that taxiing and sitting around waiting for T/O clearance.
We never do it.
We never do it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



