Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Corporate
Small time company - small plane >

Small time company - small plane

Search
Notices
Corporate Corporate operators

Small time company - small plane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2012, 12:58 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
skydisaster's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: First Officer
Posts: 432
Default

A typical rule of thumb is to buy the airplane that is the right airplane for 80% of your trips, and charter for the remainder. In this case, I would recommend that you charter for the longer trips, and buy for the remainder. Of course, this depends on what is available for charter in your area.

Oh, and with a little over 600 hours in Skymasters, the last airplane that I would recommend is a C337.
skydisaster is offline  
Old 05-10-2012, 06:40 PM
  #12  
Respek
 
Cruz5350's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,603
Default

Grab a Dakota I loved mine honest 4 place airplane with a decent cruise speed to boot. You can get your hands on one for 75k-100k and the motor is bullet proof. I think A/C was an option and most on the market at least have a semi decent stack of radios in them.
Cruz5350 is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 11:38 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Posts: 1,602
Default

Originally Posted by skydisaster View Post
Oh, and with a little over 600 hours in Skymasters, the last airplane that I would recommend is a C337.
Well you're really not gonna like this one then because my other "baby" is the MU-2! That one I would discourage however. Although, some budget conscious buyer is going to go "wow, a turbine for 250K, I'm in!"
Std Deviation is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 03:22 PM
  #14  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by Std Deviation View Post
Well you're really not gonna like this one then because my other "baby" is the MU-2! That one I would discourage however. Although, some budget conscious buyer is going to go "wow, a turbine for 250K, I'm in!"
That would be perfect for a "lower time pilot".
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 07:11 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 949
Default

Thank you all. I still haven't made much headway in the cost versus capability department, but am hoping to make some progress this weekend and pass it off to the pilot by the end of the week. Doing this for free is only so fun.
DirectTo is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 06:09 PM
  #16  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

A single piston would be ideal for the majority of the "estimated" trips, and the cirrus is a good airframe, just the people flying them mucking that up. You can find an Archer with air also, but giving up a lot of speed, but wouldn't make 5 min difference on most of those short trips.

Chartering might sound expensive, but it's cheaper than owning more airplane than you need. Also, should give the bossman an idea of what it might cost to own.
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 05-13-2012, 12:36 PM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Position: SF3 Rt Hopefully
Posts: 45
Default

Having flown charter at one point in a Seneca II, I would say the Seneca makes a great machine for the low cost it takes to operate one etc., The fuel burn per hour is impressively efficient for sure, at least ours was! You can definitely find one right now for under 250 at least!
Draden is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:48 PM
  #18  
On Reserve
 
Lear60 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by Std Deviation View Post
Although, some budget conscious buyer is going to go "wow, a turbine for 250K, I'm in!"
Yeah, that is EXACTLY what went though the mind of my boss 2 years ago! And he wanted to restore it, with new paint and a glass cockpit and all this stuff....well that didn't last long, just long enough for me to get 280 hours in it and then it went bye-bye. But now I can say I flew an MU-2 and survived.
Lear60 Driver is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 04:16 AM
  #19  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default 206H

• Drop the air conditioning idea. Ineffective in this weight class. Just get one of those ice chests with a fan in it.
• Drop the no headset idea, another silly idea. Spend 5k on headsets.

Advantages of a 206H.

• reliable
• fairly up to date
• can carry up to 6 people with a decent amount of luggage
• fast enough to be useful (especially the turbo model)
• low insurance mins
• easy to fly
• short field performance is excellent
• prices are around $250-300k for a nice used one
• comfortable to climb in & out of
• high wing config is nice for shade and visibility
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 07:45 AM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 2
Default

Southwest,, maybe American,,, shouldnt need any headsets... well maybe for the movie... Not the best route but way inder the Budget
donwelker is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RJ85FO
Regional
34
04-17-2017 04:16 PM
Albief15
Cargo
77
01-06-2012 01:39 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
vagabond
Major
3
04-30-2007 04:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices