Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Corporate
Challenger Type Question... >

Challenger Type Question...


Notices
Corporate Corporate operators

Challenger Type Question...

Old 01-07-2007 | 03:38 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: CRJ700 Left
Default Challenger Type Question...

My type says CL-65 for the CRJ 200.

I've heard but never confirmed from other RJ pilots here in the regionals that it's the same type as the Challenger series...

Anybody know if that's correct?
Reply
Old 01-07-2007 | 04:46 PM
  #2  
groovinaviator's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: CL65 Captain
Default

I've heard 2 very different stories... Please someone who really knows and has flown both aircraft as PIC let us know.

Thanks
Reply
Old 01-07-2007 | 06:07 PM
  #3  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Couldn't you just ask the FSDO or is that barking up the wrong tree? Just call them and use someone elses name.
Reply
Old 01-07-2007 | 07:08 PM
  #4  
groovinaviator's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: CL65 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
Couldn't you just ask the FSDO or is that barking up the wrong tree? Just call them and use someone elses name.
I suppose that would be one route to go, but rather than bothering them I was hoping someone on here could fill in the blanks... good thought though, but why not use your own name for such an innocent question? The FAA won't violate you for using your name when you ask such a non-confrontational question. I guess I don't understand your logic in this case.

Last edited by groovinaviator; 01-07-2007 at 07:09 PM. Reason: I can't seem to spell everything correctly the first time...
Reply
Old 01-07-2007 | 07:22 PM
  #5  
FlyerJosh's Avatar
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,080
Likes: 0
From: Executive Transport Driver
Default

CL65 = type rating for the CRJ series of aircraft ONLY.

The challenger series have their own type ratings. (CL600, CL604, don't know the others for the newer versions)

A semi-current list of type rating designations can be found here:
http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/e...a/2_009_00.pdf
(pages 14-21)

Last edited by FlyerJosh; 01-07-2007 at 07:34 PM.
Reply
Old 01-07-2007 | 07:25 PM
  #6  
groovinaviator's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: CL65 Captain
Default Appreciate the help

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
CL65 = type rating for the CRJ series of aircraft ONLY.

The challenger series have their own type ratings.
Thanks for the info... I'll take it as truth unless someone else on the forum wants to speak up.
Reply
Old 01-07-2007 | 07:40 PM
  #7  
FlyerJosh's Avatar
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,080
Likes: 0
From: Executive Transport Driver
Default

See the above edit to my post for additional info.
Reply
Old 01-08-2007 | 12:31 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Default

When I got my cl-65 type back in '97, I asked about the 604 type. The guys in CYUL told me that while the planes were quite similar, it was a separate type rating. At the time they did not have a short course to get the additional type.

So, unless I am out of date with this info, they are not interchangeable. It is a shame, this would open up a lot of possibilities for quite a lot of drivers.
Reply
Old 01-08-2007 | 12:39 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: DHC-6 / PC-12
Default

Originally Posted by groovinaviator
I suppose that would be one route to go, but rather than bothering them I was hoping someone on here could fill in the blanks... good thought though, but why not use your own name for such an innocent question? The FAA won't violate you for using your name when you ask such a non-confrontational question. I guess I don't understand your logic in this case.
You know they really are there to help with this type of thing, plus you are only being responsible. I do a little with the FAAST guys out of the PWM FSDO and one of the things that they always say, is that not enough people call for clarification. I got set up with them because I called on a question that I got from one of my students. Just making a quick call (and if you don't want to Identify yourself, then dont. But there is no need to lie about it) can save a lot of confusion and potential problems down the road. But keep in mind, what you will get is an INTERPRETATION. If it is that important, get it in writing or record it. They are generally more than willing to help.

Granted, the FSDO up here is the best that I have worked with thus far and way better than the ones in FL. So if you don't like them and you still have a question, call Portland, ME!
Reply
Old 01-12-2007 | 01:54 PM
  #10  
jrmyl's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: 747
Default

The problem with FSDO's is that you can get different answers from different ones. I think the FAA has as many answers as they do people working there.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SkyHigh
GoJet
179
02-09-2009 07:14 AM
HSLD
Pilot Health
0
12-12-2006 11:06 PM
flysafe540
Regional
36
07-29-2006 10:39 PM
XtremeF150
Fractional
12
07-25-2006 07:48 AM
surreal1221
Major
20
06-08-2006 02:43 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices