Challenger Type Question...
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: CRJ700 Left
My type says CL-65 for the CRJ 200.
I've heard but never confirmed from other RJ pilots here in the regionals that it's the same type as the Challenger series...
Anybody know if that's correct?
I've heard but never confirmed from other RJ pilots here in the regionals that it's the same type as the Challenger series...
Anybody know if that's correct?
#4
I suppose that would be one route to go, but rather than bothering them I was hoping someone on here could fill in the blanks... good thought though, but why not use your own name for such an innocent question? The FAA won't violate you for using your name when you ask such a non-confrontational question. I guess I don't understand your logic in this case.
Last edited by groovinaviator; 01-07-2007 at 07:09 PM. Reason: I can't seem to spell everything correctly the first time...
#5
CL65 = type rating for the CRJ series of aircraft ONLY.
The challenger series have their own type ratings. (CL600, CL604, don't know the others for the newer versions)
A semi-current list of type rating designations can be found here:
http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/e...a/2_009_00.pdf
(pages 14-21)
The challenger series have their own type ratings. (CL600, CL604, don't know the others for the newer versions)
A semi-current list of type rating designations can be found here:
http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/e...a/2_009_00.pdf
(pages 14-21)
Last edited by FlyerJosh; 01-07-2007 at 07:34 PM.
#6
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
When I got my cl-65 type back in '97, I asked about the 604 type. The guys in CYUL told me that while the planes were quite similar, it was a separate type rating. At the time they did not have a short course to get the additional type.
So, unless I am out of date with this info, they are not interchangeable. It is a shame, this would open up a lot of possibilities for quite a lot of drivers.
So, unless I am out of date with this info, they are not interchangeable. It is a shame, this would open up a lot of possibilities for quite a lot of drivers.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: DHC-6 / PC-12
I suppose that would be one route to go, but rather than bothering them I was hoping someone on here could fill in the blanks... good thought though, but why not use your own name for such an innocent question? The FAA won't violate you for using your name when you ask such a non-confrontational question. I guess I don't understand your logic in this case.
Granted, the FSDO up here is the best that I have worked with thus far and way better than the ones in FL. So if you don't like them and you still have a question, call Portland, ME!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



