Hydroxychloroquine
04-18-2020, 07:49 AM
#341
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: Gummed
Posts: 1,060
Originally Posted by emersonbiguns
Why are you selectively accepting of science? You immediately jump on the bandwagon of something that is days old and fits your world view, but discount a concept that is years old, accepted within the entire, non-fringe scientific community but doesn’t fall within your political paradigm.
Sounds like you're more interested in confirmation bias than science.
Sounds like you're more interested in confirmation bias than science.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/04/...e-coronavirus/
Chelsea, MA study. 32% greater or 16x higher than the "experts" predicted. More to follow from that study I'm sure.
So about those death rate numbers and shutting down the world......
You'd think you guys would be happy to see this research. It is better news. It's time for us to get back to work. Enjoy your weekend.
04-18-2020, 07:55 AM
#342
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,818
Originally Posted by Nvrgofullretard
id rather talk about why we don’t have a checklist for moving flaps prior to moving the jet and yet it’s such a big goddam deal if we taxi with out the flaps down. .
I agree, if TOFU is such a big deal, it should be on the After Start.
04-18-2020, 08:10 AM
#343
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 770
Originally Posted by Phins2right
OMG. Look! Now the researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital are in on the heresy!
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/04/...e-coronavirus/
Chelsea, MA study. 32% greater or 16x higher than the "experts" predicted. More to follow from that study I'm sure.
So about those death rate numbers and shutting down the world......
You'd think you guys would be happy to see this research. It is better news. It's time for us to get back to work. Enjoy your weekend.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/04/...e-coronavirus/
Chelsea, MA study. 32% greater or 16x higher than the "experts" predicted. More to follow from that study I'm sure.
So about those death rate numbers and shutting down the world......
You'd think you guys would be happy to see this research. It is better news. It's time for us to get back to work. Enjoy your weekend.
If that is the case, the push to reopen seems not only reasonable, but imperative.
I'm still skeptical, but this is great news. I hope this study is indicative the broader population is farther along and in less jeopardy than originally thought.
I would love to be the guy incredibly wrong about this from the beginning.
04-18-2020, 08:24 AM
#344
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: Gummed
Posts: 1,060
Originally Posted by emersonbiguns
Why are you selectively accepting of science? You immediately jump on the bandwagon of something that is days old and fits your world view, but discount a concept that is years old, accepted within the entire, non-fringe scientific community but doesn’t fall within your political paradigm.
Sounds like you're more interested in confirmation bias than science.
Sounds like you're more interested in confirmation bias than science.
News from a antibody study in Germany by the DKGH (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Krankenhaushygiene). You do speak German right?
https://www.land.nrw/sites/default/f..._gangelt_0.pdf
Go to the last two bolded paragraphs. Vorläufiges Ergebnis and then Vorläufige Schlussfolgerung. Antibodies found to be 15x those predicted by models. So gain, more people exposed than previously modeled/assumed. A good thing.
If you want to call them to question their findings, I'll provide you their contact info:
Geschäftsstelle
Joachimsthaler Straße 10
10719 Berlin
Telefon +49 30 8872737-30
Fax +49 30 8872737-37
E-Mail [email protected]
04-18-2020, 08:42 AM
#346
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: Gummed
Posts: 1,060
Originally Posted by FL370esq
Vielen Dank....
Tschüß
04-18-2020, 08:56 AM
#347
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,260
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
Because, "Prior to Aircraft Movement," is such a useful and obvious trigger.
I agree, if TOFU is such a big deal, it should be on the After Start.
I agree, if TOFU is such a big deal, it should be on the After Start.
04-18-2020, 09:00 AM
#348
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,818
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
I believe it is in the after start for AAL.
04-18-2020, 09:07 AM
#349
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,076
Originally Posted by crewdawg
Ha right, it's good enough for the military but not muh baby!
Also them...
We can't hand use this stuff because...side effects. What's that? Heck ya you need to keep handing those opioids out with PEZ dispensers.
Also them...
We can't hand use this stuff because...side effects. What's that? Heck ya you need to keep handing those opioids out with PEZ dispensers.
Last edited by CBreezy; 04-18-2020 at 09:20 AM.
04-18-2020, 09:39 AM
#350
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Position: NYC 7ERA
Posts: 1,967
Originally Posted by CBreezy
Since when does the military cares about your health...
I've had to have 6 revisionary surgeries for things that were either not fixed right, or fixed halfbutted for the sake of less recovery time. Upside, I now have full range of motion in my back and left ankle. Downside, surgery recovery sucks, and they still need to fix my right arm, but it's "functional" just can't do a lot of pushups, hammer curl over 50 pounds, or bench over 255. Which annoys me.
People who want government run health care (not just govt paid) don't know what they are asking for.. But back to the subject at hand, if it had huge bad side effects in a widespread demographic of all races, ethnicity, and age 17-60, the military would have found out by now.
