Hydroxychloroquine
04-17-2020 | 04:59 PM
#312
Banned
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: Gummed
Nah it's just the Stanford study on china flu antibodies. The one where Stanford researches state there's 50-85 times more people infected with the china flu than they had thought. Thereby driving the death rate way, way way down. You really should read it. Kinda like that model that overestimated the death rate by like 462% and moved the goal posts for peak like 4 times. Oh and that other thing, it will come to light in due time just like I told you. Haven't you been paying attention?
04-17-2020 | 04:59 PM
#313
P/T Gear Slinger
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 886
Likes: 40
From: Airbus
Hah, that's rich coming from you.
BTW you check out the Stanford Santa Clara county study yet? It's long past time to open the country back up.
https://noqreport.com/2020/04/17/bre...y-coronavirus/
BTW you check out the Stanford Santa Clara county study yet? It's long past time to open the country back up.
https://noqreport.com/2020/04/17/bre...y-coronavirus/
04-17-2020 | 05:02 PM
#314
Banned
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: Gummed
I guess if the source was Vox or CNN and it was contradictory to the fact, you'd be right on board with it no questions asked.
04-17-2020 | 05:05 PM
#315
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Newk, the first problem is those deaths are not necessarily caused by Covid. Birx said that very clearly and the CDC has it written on their website. They include assumed deaths, tests are not required. What if it's a fraction of the 30k+ actually being killed by the virus? Go back a few weeks ago and even one Italian minister said that was the case in Italy, probably looking at 12% of the reported being actual Covid deaths and we're using the same assumed reporting.
Bring it back around to the car analogy. 110 people die a day from driving but you go drive anyways at 70mph, 90 in Florida or Atlanta. And you do it. We accept risk. For those who cannot accept it, they have an option, stay inside but we don't all have to be on house arrest because of their fear.
Bring it back around to the car analogy. 110 people die a day from driving but you go drive anyways at 70mph, 90 in Florida or Atlanta. And you do it. We accept risk. For those who cannot accept it, they have an option, stay inside but we don't all have to be on house arrest because of their fear.
So wait. All of the leaders in the world are wrong?
04-17-2020 | 05:15 PM
#316
Line Holder
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
I find it a waste of time to 'discuss' anything with people that are so emotionally invested in an outcome that they have neither the patience or intelligence to synthesize data as it becomes available. It just so happens that they are also the people most proven wrong - time and again - but self-reflection also resides in the same 'side of the brain' as the ability to be analytical.
04-17-2020 | 05:31 PM
#317
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Nah it's just the Stanford study on china flu antibodies. The one where Stanford researches state there's 50-85 times more people infected with the china flu than they had thought. Thereby driving the death rate way, way way down. You really should read it. Kinda like that model that overestimated the death rate by like 462% and moved the goal posts for peak like 4 times. Oh and that other thing, it will come to light in due time just like I told you. Haven't you been paying attention?
04-17-2020 | 07:13 PM
#318
P/T Gear Slinger
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 886
Likes: 40
From: Airbus
Originally Posted by From Your Link
This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Originally Posted by From the Linked Website
What is an unrefereed preprint?
Before formal publication in a scholarly journal, scientific and medical articles are traditionally certified by “peer review.” In this process, the journal’s editors take advice from various experts—called “referees”—who have assessed the paper and may identify weaknesses in its assumptions, methods, and conclusions. Typically a journal will only publish an article once the editors are satisfied that the authors have addressed referees’ concerns and that the data presented support the conclusions drawn in the paper.Because this process can be lengthy, authors use the medRxiv service to make their manuscripts available as “preprints” before certification by peer review, allowing other scientists to see, discuss, and comment on the findings immediately. Readers should therefore be aware that articles on medRxiv have not been finalized by authors, might contain errors, and report information that has not yet been accepted or endorsed in any way by the scientific or medical community.
We also urge journalists and other individuals who report on medical research to the general public to consider this when discussing work that appears on medRxiv preprints and emphasize it has yet to be evaluated by the medical community and the information presented may be erroneous.
Not peer reviewed, not published. Maybe you could find a second career picking cherries?
Science is such a sham, maybe we could start a movement called #fakescience ?
04-17-2020 | 07:33 PM
#319
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Nah it's just the Stanford study on china flu antibodies. The one where Stanford researches state there's 50-85 times more people infected with the china flu than they had thought. Thereby driving the death rate way, way way down. You really should read it. Kinda like that model that overestimated the death rate by like 462% and moved the goal posts for peak like 4 times. Oh and that other thing, it will come to light in due time just like I told you. Haven't you been paying attention?
How about you not cherry pick one study that may or may not be true, and let the professionals who have dedicated their lives to studying diseases handle this. I have a VERY good life long friend who is an ER doctor in Manhattan and he said it’s a ****ing warzone. His very words were “this is not a normal flu”. How are you going to refute this statement? How can you, an armchair rocket surgeon, say he is wrong? I have an idea, how about you leave this to qualified people, and not your partisan news channel.
I understand that we are going to learn from this, and will find better procedures to minimize the impact in the future, but let’s not get a bunch of old people killed by rushing this.
The funny thing about people like you, is that you would tweak if some dude came up to your flight deck and told you how to get from A to B. And yet you are happily willing to tell doctors how to handle this? Give me a break.
i bet you are also a climate denier. You know, cause FOX says it’s a hoax right?
