Enough cowardice, it’s not THAT bad!
#21
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 246
Likes: 3
The current death rate due to the Cvirus in the US (26Apr2020) is 0.32.
Based on the US flu death rate of 0.1, and the average number of flu deaths per year (over the past 9 years, of 37,400), we should expect about 120,000 US deaths in this 12 month cycle.
The Swedish death rate as of 26Apr is now at 0.69. If we had the same rate as Sweden, we would expect about 260,000 US deaths in the 12 month period.
We had about 50,000 Americans die in combat during the Vietnam War, which lasted about 30 years. We have had 55,415 Cvirus deaths to date, so we are already over the Vietnam War casualty number...in a few months...
Based on the US flu death rate of 0.1, and the average number of flu deaths per year (over the past 9 years, of 37,400), we should expect about 120,000 US deaths in this 12 month cycle.
The Swedish death rate as of 26Apr is now at 0.69. If we had the same rate as Sweden, we would expect about 260,000 US deaths in the 12 month period.
We had about 50,000 Americans die in combat during the Vietnam War, which lasted about 30 years. We have had 55,415 Cvirus deaths to date, so we are already over the Vietnam War casualty number...in a few months...
There is no need to assign numbers, that is what a percentage is for, to ‘see the big picture’. And looking at a pie chart, you don’t make decisions that can wreck the entire pie, when the tiniest sliver had a problem.
I’m not saying screw them, kill them...we need to protect them with everything we can do, short of wrecking the whole pie (but we decided the “wreck the whole pie” route), because then, no one can’t eat any of it, as opposed to just that sliver being tossed out and the rest saved.
Especially when this most in this sliver is going to die anyway in a few years. If I was in this sliver, I would beg of you to not ruin this great country to potentially extend my life 5-20 years more.
#22
Banned
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
There is no need to assign numbers, that is what a percentage is for, to ‘see the big picture’. And looking at a pie chart, you don’t make decisions that can wreck the entire pie, when the tiniest sliver had a problem.
I’m not saying screw them, kill them...we need to protect them with everything we can do, short of wrecking the whole pie (but we decided the “wreck the whole pie” route), because then, no one can’t eat any of it, as opposed to just that sliver being tossed out and the rest saved.
Especially when this most in this sliver is going to die anyway in a few years. If I was in this sliver, I would beg of you to not ruin this great country to potentially extend my life 5-20 years more.
I’m not saying screw them, kill them...we need to protect them with everything we can do, short of wrecking the whole pie (but we decided the “wreck the whole pie” route), because then, no one can’t eat any of it, as opposed to just that sliver being tossed out and the rest saved.
Especially when this most in this sliver is going to die anyway in a few years. If I was in this sliver, I would beg of you to not ruin this great country to potentially extend my life 5-20 years more.
https://www.usnews.com/news/world-re...positive-again
Is this a one-off occurrence or is this going to be the new-normal for everyone infected? There are tons of possible long-term and N-th order effects, I just chose this specific one as an example. My point, as unpopular as it may be, is that we're actually handling it well. The virus showed up quickly, it got out of control in a few places, we locked down the economy, we've bought ourselves time to study the virus, develop vaccines, antivirals manufacture tests, PPE, etc, and now we're steadily and carefully opening the economy in phases. The shortest way out of this is we discover the virus isn't that bad. The longest way is it is that bad, and resistant to vaccines. Usually reality is somewhere in the middle.
#26
The current death rate due to the Cvirus in the US (26Apr2020) is 0.32.
Based on the US flu death rate of 0.1, and the average number of flu deaths per year (over the past 9 years, of 37,400), we should expect about 120,000 US deaths in this 12 month cycle.
The Swedish death rate as of 26Apr is now at 0.69. If we had the same rate as Sweden, we would expect about 260,000 US deaths in the 12 month period.
We had about 50,000 Americans die in combat during the Vietnam War, which lasted about 30 years. We have had 55,415 Cvirus deaths to date, so we are already over the Vietnam War casualty number...in a few months...
Based on the US flu death rate of 0.1, and the average number of flu deaths per year (over the past 9 years, of 37,400), we should expect about 120,000 US deaths in this 12 month cycle.
The Swedish death rate as of 26Apr is now at 0.69. If we had the same rate as Sweden, we would expect about 260,000 US deaths in the 12 month period.
We had about 50,000 Americans die in combat during the Vietnam War, which lasted about 30 years. We have had 55,415 Cvirus deaths to date, so we are already over the Vietnam War casualty number...in a few months...
Uh.., before the coronavirus came along we were having about 15,000 deaths EVERY DAY. We have three million deaths every year. With a population of a third of a Billion and a median life expectancy of ~80 years it could scarcely be otherwise.
But it ain’t a bell shaped curve of people centered on age 80. We have about 2 million people 90 years or over according to the census bureau but only ~75,000 people 100 years or over. Deaths increase radically after 80 years, chronic problems get worse, new problems develop. The metric the Preventive Medicine community uses is YPPL, that is Years of Potential Life Lost.
not all deaths are a tragedy, some in fact are a mercy. Half of the deaths in Italy so far have been in people 90 years and above with multiple preexisting conditions. That old codger that started smoking at 18 and has been doing two packs a day since he was eating C-rations during WWII is one bad cold or mild flue away from dying. H€|| yeah, encourage him to shelter in place with his oxygen tank or concentrator and wait for the general population to get this until there is enough herd immunity that he can safely leave his bedroom.
anybody who is healthy and less than 65 ought to be out and about. And that’s certainly the vast majority of airline pilots.
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 57
The issue with this logic is everyone is assuming the best-case scenario, which is you get it, it's not that bad for 90% of people, you develop anti-bodies that last several years, and move on. The conversations would be vastly different if we knew we were dealing with an incurable virus version of Tuberculosis versus a nasty rhinovirus. Right now, there's evidence to support each extreme. I mean, to add more uncertainty, the virus has started reactivating in Korea:
https://www.usnews.com/news/world-re...positive-again
Is this a one-off occurrence or is this going to be the new-normal for everyone infected? There are tons of possible long-term and N-th order effects, I just chose this specific one as an example. My point, as unpopular as it may be, is that we're actually handling it well. The virus showed up quickly, it got out of control in a few places, we locked down the economy, we've bought ourselves time to study the virus, develop vaccines, antivirals manufacture tests, PPE, etc, and now we're steadily and carefully opening the economy in phases. The shortest way out of this is we discover the virus isn't that bad. The longest way is it is that bad, and resistant to vaccines. Usually reality is somewhere in the middle.
https://www.usnews.com/news/world-re...positive-again
Is this a one-off occurrence or is this going to be the new-normal for everyone infected? There are tons of possible long-term and N-th order effects, I just chose this specific one as an example. My point, as unpopular as it may be, is that we're actually handling it well. The virus showed up quickly, it got out of control in a few places, we locked down the economy, we've bought ourselves time to study the virus, develop vaccines, antivirals manufacture tests, PPE, etc, and now we're steadily and carefully opening the economy in phases. The shortest way out of this is we discover the virus isn't that bad. The longest way is it is that bad, and resistant to vaccines. Usually reality is somewhere in the middle.
Your making to much sense for APC. The shutdown has always been about preventing large portions of society getting sick in roughly the same timeframe. I would hate to see what that looks like economically and socially. We’re opening back up. Some states a week earlier than last planned. The medical news is pretty positive so far. I’m not sure what the issue is? We are where we are today. Would have could have is for when it’s over.
#28
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,888
Likes: 684
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
The issue with this logic is everyone is assuming the best-case scenario, which is you get it, it's not that bad for 90% of people, you develop anti-bodies that last several years, and move on. The conversations would be vastly different if we knew we were dealing with an incurable virus version of Tuberculosis versus a nasty rhinovirus.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 57
It seems as though there could potentially be supply chain issues with meat due to numerous cases at processing factories. It’s a problem but manageable. What’s not manageable is supply chain issues across the economy, police, fire, truckers, doctors, nurses, military personnel, and grocery store workers shortages if this thing got out of hand initially. The mortality rate didn’t really matter if large portions of the country were sick around the same time for two weeks minimum.Today It seems as though we’re going to be past that potential problem shortly. To me that’s good news and now it’s on to phase 2. Reopening in a way that doesn’t cause the country to go back to phase 1 near term. There’s going to be issues along the way however the general trend is improving IMO.
Last edited by fcoolaiddrinker; 04-28-2020 at 12:53 PM.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: 747 FO
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gNTHuCOjAy8
https://arstechnica.com/science/2020...orse-than-flu/
But no, thankfully our great service members Put on their big boy pants and are willing to sacrifice their lives to save a nation, to have a prosperous nation.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2020...orse-than-flu/
But no, thankfully our great service members Put on their big boy pants and are willing to sacrifice their lives to save a nation, to have a prosperous nation.
- About four in ten adults (37.6%) ages 18 and older in the U.S. (92.6 million people) have a higher risk of developing serious illness if they become infected with coronavirus, due to their older age (65 and older) or health condition (Figure 1; Table 1).
So let’s say 93+ Million people. A lot of these “open now” folks must have shorted life insurance stocks or own casket company stocks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



