Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
Hydroxychloroquine increases Covid survival >

Hydroxychloroquine increases Covid survival

Search

Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

Hydroxychloroquine increases Covid survival

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-2020 | 07:11 AM
  #21  
Speed, Power, Accuracy
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 10
From: PIC
Default

Originally Posted by Downtime
You do realize every drug has been evaluated on vent patients right? So it’s not fraud it was the design of the study. Dexo was given to people on vents and cut deaths by a third. Sure it may have some value at some point but for now it has failed. So find me a double blind study that says it has any benefit early. Preferably with thousands of patients and robust control group. Studies or it did not happen.
Show me a "sanctioned" double blind study that utilizes the protocol of PROPER dosage of HCQ combined with zinc and the Z pack for Covid positive patients at ANY stage of the disease. I'll wait.....

That's right. The study doesn't exist. Because of the reported overwhelming anecdotal success of this protocol in France and the New York area by doctors who work outside the establishment, the WHO, CDC, and FDA won't sanction a proper study of the concept. Might actually prove the technique works and they can't have that.
Reply
Old 07-04-2020 | 08:29 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
Show me a "sanctioned" double blind study that utilizes the protocol of PROPER dosage of HCQ combined with zinc and the Z pack for Covid positive patients at ANY stage of the disease. I'll wait.....

That's right. The study doesn't exist. Because of the reported overwhelming anecdotal success of this protocol in France and the New York area by doctors who work outside the establishment, the WHO, CDC, and FDA won't sanction a proper study of the concept. Might actually prove the technique works and they can't have that.
So one using more then the recommended dosage is not unusual in acute situations. It’s is just you would not want to do it long term which many HCQ users are. You just said you have anecdotal observations and that is not how it works. France is one of the countries in which the double blind study failed. It has succeeded anywhere in the world in a double blind study.
Reply
Old 07-04-2020 | 08:57 AM
  #23  
DC8DRIVER's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 2
From: 747
Default

Originally Posted by MamaHidesCookie
Yeah... the drug is super unsafe. It’s only been around for nearly 5 decades and millions of people use it globally every day...
Originally Posted by Black Warrior
Take that up with Henry Ford Health System for doing the study, and with CNN for publishing the results.
I only post the news, pal.
​​​​​​​
Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
EVERY "official" study EXCEEDED the known daily dosage limit of 200mg per day as part of the study protocol. They were giving people THREE TIMES the limit because of 65 years of data about proper therapeutic dose versus toxic dose. And I'm still waiting for an "official" study that combines the PROPER dosage of HCQ with ZINC and Z Pac. It isn't the HCQ that provides the benefit. It's the ZINC but it needs the HCQ to "unlock" the cell to allow the zinc inside and interrupt reproduction of the virus.
If you don't think there has been a concerted, financially and politically motivated effort to discredit HCQ therapy, you probably think Epstein killed himself, too.
OK. I guess you guys are right.

Just how long have you all been taking this drug?

What??? You're not? I wonder why. I mean the highest authority in the land has said that's it's OK and your own research shows it is the best thing to take. So Why not take it? Why not put your medicine where your mouth is?

Hypocritical much? LOL
​​​​​​​
Reply
Old 07-04-2020 | 09:02 AM
  #24  
DC8DRIVER's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 2
From: 747
Default

Recommendation to take hydroxychloroquine.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tru...ne-coronavirus
Reply
Old 07-04-2020 | 09:08 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Default

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are still available to use by a physician but much better protocols are available. All the clinical trials I personally know of have concluded at this time. Now, based on on all the metadata analysis the benifits are still not not established and it is not the leading choice of therapy.

Whereas treatment with a combination anticoagulants, steriods, and other immune suppressent/antibody cocktail is proving to be much more effective in clinical settings and leading to a higher percentage of favorable outcomes. Compound that with remdisovir, which is in such short supply right now, there are many tools in the toolkit. The medical community is sharing information at a rapid pace and protocols are constantly being adjusted. At this time i see no clinics favoring one treatment over the other due to politics or financial gain.. especially since many of the clinics are now treating their own colleagues. Preventing patients from disseminating introvascular coagulation (DIC) and intubation are keys to favorable outcomes and preventing further multi system failure and post recovery chronic conditions.

Unfortunately, there is a rise in intubations again now, especially in Houston / San Antonio area. Fingers crossed it is curbed.
Reply
Old 07-04-2020 | 10:19 AM
  #26  
Speed, Power, Accuracy
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 10
From: PIC
Default

Originally Posted by Downtime
So one using more then the recommended dosage is not unusual in acute situations. It’s is just you would not want to do it long term which many HCQ users are. You just said you have anecdotal observations and that is not how it works. France is one of the countries in which the double blind study failed. It has succeeded anywhere in the world in a double blind study.
Are you always this obtuse? All the “sanctioned” studies OVERDOSED the patients with HCQ and/or did not include zinc and Zpac with the HCQ. That is the POINT. The protocol that resulted in positive anecdotal outcomes has NEVER BEEN CLINICALLY TESTED. Could it be that the “experts” don’t want to confirm the efficacy when PROPERLY used?
Reply
Old 07-04-2020 | 10:24 AM
  #27  
Speed, Power, Accuracy
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 10
From: PIC
Default

Originally Posted by DC8DRIVER

OK. I guess you guys are right.

Just how long have you all been taking this drug?

What??? You're not? I wonder why. I mean the highest authority in the land has said that's it's OK and your own research shows it is the best thing to take. So Why not take it? Why not put your medicine where your mouth is?

Hypocritical much? LOL
IF I were to contract this virus, my Doc is already on board with prescribing HCQ 200 mg with zinc and Zpac. He’s been prescribing HCQ to his Lupus patients for YEARS.
​​​​​​​
Reply
Old 07-04-2020 | 11:01 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
Are you always this obtuse? All the “sanctioned” studies OVERDOSED the patients with HCQ and/or did not include zinc and Zpac with the HCQ. That is the POINT. The protocol that resulted in positive anecdotal outcomes has NEVER BEEN CLINICALLY TESTED. Could it be that the “experts” don’t want to confirm the efficacy when PROPERLY used?
There have been multiple multivariate studies performed.

If you want to supliment zinc feel free to just use a daily multivitamin

Zinc really has only been proven clinically to aid in marginal testosterone production. The whole zinc anion/cation and viruses has been largely debunked. That's how Zicam came and went and the massive amounts of lawsuits it had to defend. .

As far as azithromycin and covid goes. There is a lot of evidence that a broad spectrum antibiotic during seroconverion of the virus is effective at preventing secondary infection. We really have mixed and unsubstantiated results as an antiviral.
Reply
Old 07-04-2020 | 11:02 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
Are you always this obtuse? All the “sanctioned” studies OVERDOSED the patients with HCQ and/or did not include zinc and Zpac with the HCQ. That is the POINT. The protocol that resulted in positive anecdotal outcomes has NEVER BEEN CLINICALLY TESTED. Could it be that the “experts” don’t want to confirm the efficacy when PROPERLY used?

Obtuse here is the thing. There are currently four trials underway using your plan. That said you have no proof it works that isn’t anecdotal and small. I’d be happy if it works but right now there is no proof that it works. So when those trails are finished of the probe to work then great let’s go. It sounds like though you are in the wrong profession and should be putting your pharmD to better use in the research arena.
Reply
Old 07-04-2020 | 04:23 PM
  #30  
Anson Harris
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by OpMidClimax
Unfortunately, there is a rise in intubations again now, especially in Houston / San Antonio area. Fingers crossed it is curbed.
As sad as this may be, this site is one of my best for staying informed on covid treatment. The regular media is beyond disappointing.

Can you elaborate on what's going on in TX with intubations? My biggest fear (such that it is) about getting covid is that I'll end up in a hospital that doesn't yet understand the role of anti-inflammatory/coagulent treatment and is stuck on the ventilator bandwagon. Why our national dialog isn't more focused on effective treatment and less on partisan nonsense is beyond me.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BestForward
JetBlue
14677
Yesterday 03:19 PM
vagabond
Pilot Health
1
05-22-2014 04:39 AM
USMCFLYR
Safety
0
04-18-2011 04:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices