Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
PSP 2.0; is it gonna happen? >

PSP 2.0; is it gonna happen?

Search
Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

PSP 2.0; is it gonna happen?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2020, 06:06 AM
  #521  
Speed, Power, Accuracy
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
Default

Originally Posted by senecacaptain View Post
as I stated in earlier posts, I am not sure what, if anything, a President can do for private industry during a Continuing Resolution ("CR"). CR's are intended to keep government ops running until the official fiscal year budget is approved by Congress. Most agencies have various directives and edicts that the only permitted things are mission essential/critical ops, and no new operations or activities can be "launched" during a CR. This varies between agency to agency, but that is the general way of doing business under a CR.

He can tweet what he wants, and claim we have money to do it, but he is akin to that rich jet owner telling his buddies lets go to Aspen tonight ! Sure, we can leave now. However upon talking to the pilots, NOTAMS exist and night ops are prohibited at the airport, and, well, no, we really can't go tonight.

my 2 cents

Good Luck to everyone. when the PSP money transfer from Treasury over to the airline's bank account happens, then I will believe it happened.
Bad example Seneca. You can go into Aspen on a private jet at night. Legally. If it's the right jet with the right company. The optical illusions at night are "interesting" but the RNP AR approach is slick. Jusssss sayin.

As to your POINT, I agree.
GeeWizDriver is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 06:07 AM
  #522  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 1,256
Default

Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver View Post
Bad example Seneca. You can go into Aspen on a private jet at night. Legally. If it's the right jet with the right company. The optical illusions are "interesting" but the RNP AR approach is slick. Jusssss sayin.

As to your POINT, I agree.
bad example maybe, hey I just woke up here.
senecacaptain is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 06:09 AM
  #523  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,538
Default

Originally Posted by senecacaptain View Post
as I stated in earlier posts, I am not sure what, if anything, a President can do for private industry during a Continuing Resolution ("CR"). CR's are intended to keep government ops running until the official fiscal year budget is approved by Congress. Most agencies have various directives and edicts that the only permitted things are mission essential/critical ops, and no new operations or activities can be "launched" during a CR. This varies between agency to agency, but that is the general way of doing business under a CR.

He can tweet what he wants, and claim we have money to do it, but he is akin to that rich jet owner telling his buddies lets go to Aspen tonight ! Sure, we can leave now. However upon talking to the pilots, NOTAMS exist and night ops are prohibited at the airport, and, well, no, we really can't go tonight.

my 2 cents

Good Luck to everyone. when the PSP money transfer from Treasury over to the airline's bank account happens, then I will believe it happened.

It was a pretty clear tweet to me with no translation needed. There is unused money in the cares 1 bucket that I want to use for PSP and airline support but I need the house (the Democrats since they are in the majority) to pass some legislation for it to be used for those purposes and I will sign it immediately.

Fairly straight forward request that the House has chosen to ignore.
Seneca Pilot is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 06:11 AM
  #524  
Speed, Power, Accuracy
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
Default

Originally Posted by senecacaptain View Post
bad example maybe, hey i just woke up here.
must. Have. Coffee.

Lol
GeeWizDriver is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 10:29 AM
  #525  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by wrxpilot View Post
What about it is wrong? All seems correct to me.

I want all of my airline friends to keep their jobs, but I’m not going to bury my head in the sand about the financial reality of what’s happening. I don’t know what the answer is.
“Additional subsidies unlikely to help workers”. That’s flat out wrong.
pangolin is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 06:42 PM
  #526  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
“Additional subsidies unlikely to help workers”. That’s flat out wrong.
It won’t help them in the long run or for long term job security if it dramatically delays the recovery. Continual demand for financial support and welfare just means the airlines are surviving on subsidies and not correcting or right-sizing for the future. Another $100 in your pocket now might seem beneficial but if you kill any long term competitiveness and survival you have killed the Golden Goose.
Islandman is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 06:55 PM
  #527  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by Islandman View Post
It won’t help them in the long run or for long term job security if it dramatically delays the recovery. Continual demand for financial support and welfare just means the airlines are surviving on subsidies and not correcting or right-sizing for the future. Another $100 in your pocket now might seem beneficial but if you kill any long term competitiveness and survival you have killed the Golden Goose.
Right now it matters.
pangolin is offline  
Old 10-08-2020, 11:11 PM
  #528  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
Right now it matters.
Again....... Very shortsighted and not in the long term benefit of your employment or companies long term interests nor the taxpayers.
Islandman is offline  
Old 10-09-2020, 04:28 AM
  #529  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 125
Default

Originally Posted by Islandman View Post
Again....... Very shortsighted and not in the long term benefit of your employment or companies long term interests nor the taxpayers.
That’s one opinion on the matter. The other is that 6 more months might just get the airlines to a point where recovery is far enough along to prevent future furloughs and be poised to capitalize on the increased travel. At this point both are opinions and anything beyond is a guess. But no one knows for a fact what will happen. Unless of course they can see the future in which case where was said person last winter.
KSUto64 is offline  
Old 10-09-2020, 05:10 AM
  #530  
MAX N1, NO DERATE
 
xms3200's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 31
Default

I seriously don’t think that come spring 2021, traffic is going to increase by a significant amount to eliminate the need for furloughs.
The airlines have furloughed for long term survival, keeping on thinking that travel is going to surge next year is “fantasy”. Everyone is holding their breath on the vaccine, when it comes out, people will start questioning its effectivity as well as long term side effects.... and we will be back to anemic traffic growth.
xms3200 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LocoLizer
Major
52
06-20-2011 11:46 AM
SteamJet
Money Talk
52
08-22-2009 01:29 PM
Airsupport
Regional
46
01-23-2007 07:58 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices