Will airlines force employees get vaccine??
08-25-2020, 02:35 PM
#142
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,063
The economic impacts have nothing to do with the medical fact that people die from the flu every year to the amount of tens of thousands. So why haven't you been asking people to wear a mask and get vaccinated during flu season? Or are your arguments simply out of recent self-interest?
08-25-2020, 02:41 PM
#143
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,815
Originally Posted by Flyfalcons
The economic impacts have nothing to do with the medical fact that people die from the flu every year to the amount of tens of thousands. So why haven't you been asking people to wear a mask and get vaccinated during flu season? Or are your arguments simply out of recent self-interest?
2) Not on the scale we are seeing with COVID.
3) The affects we are seeing on the economy — whether justified or not, whether fostered by media fear-mongering or not — are putting our livelihoods on the chopping block.
4) If a vaccine could help mitigate this effect — and reduce their overall infection rate — I see it as a good thing.
It’s all about degrees of risk.
08-25-2020, 03:05 PM
#145
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Originally Posted by ERJFO
They exist to interpret the constitution.
08-25-2020, 03:32 PM
#146
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,538
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
Actually that is a myth. The Constitution doesn't need to be interpreted. It means what it says at the time it was written down. SCOTUS is there to decide if something fits into the Constitution, not the other way around.
The constitution is very exact and restricts the federal government to very few powers. It is not open to interpretation but over the years the government and judiciary have attempted to persuade the population that it is open to interpretation in order to expand the power of both parties.
08-25-2020, 09:37 PM
#147
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 114
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
Actually that is a myth. The Constitution doesn't need to be interpreted. It means what it says at the time it was written down. SCOTUS is there to decide if something fits into the Constitution, not the other way around.
However, it's not as simple as you describe. It is open to the interpretation of the justices... Even the 9 Justices often don't agree on what the Constitution means at times...
08-26-2020, 03:31 AM
#148
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Originally Posted by ERJFO
I don't disagree that the role of the Supreme Court is to invalidate legislation or executive actions which, in the Court’s considered judgment, conflict with the Constitution.
However, it's not as simple as you describe. It is open to the interpretation of the justices... Even the 9 Justices often don't agree on what the Constitution means at times...
However, it's not as simple as you describe. It is open to the interpretation of the justices... Even the 9 Justices often don't agree on what the Constitution means at times...
Look through the Constitution and find where it gives this power of interpretation to the Court. Is it there? If not, where did this power come from?
08-26-2020, 07:39 AM
#149
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Originally Posted by Seneca Pilot
Correct.
The constitution is very exact and restricts the federal government to very few powers. It is not open to interpretation but over the years the government and judiciary have attempted to persuade the population that it is open to interpretation in order to expand the power of both parties.
The constitution is very exact and restricts the federal government to very few powers. It is not open to interpretation but over the years the government and judiciary have attempted to persuade the population that it is open to interpretation in order to expand the power of both parties.
08-26-2020, 07:51 AM
#150
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Originally Posted by ERJFO
However, it's not as simple as you describe. It is open to the interpretation of the justices... Even the 9 Justices often don't agree on what the Constitution means at times...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
