No, the vaccines is not ineffective, it's just not 100% effective.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/0...ulate-00006341

Would you look at that, the admin wants to differentiate those who go to the hospital for Covid and those who happen to have Covid but come in for completely different reasons. Polling numbers must be at yet a new low.

Next we'll hear from the usual suspects about how great a move this is like they haven't spent the last two years shouting about conspiracy theorists.

Not 100% at stopping the spread? You can say that again!

Seriously, how do you come to the conclusion that the vaccine is remotely effective at stopping the spread, when case numbers this January are at an all time high and the vast majority of Americans are vaccinated? Self delusion?

It is not effective at stopping the spread.

Just weeks ago people were being deplatformed and censored for saying the same thing.

Tell me, where would the cases be without the vaccine. Show me the data you have. And again, no vaccine has ever been 100% effective.

On the other hand, the data shows it is 91% effective at stopping the spread for the fully vaccinated. Of course, you'll tell me how the CDC is biased and unreliable, ad infinitum.

https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2...uce-risks.html

The goal posts keep moving. It moved from stopping the spread to lowering the spread (until some studies showed vaccinated people might have higher viral loads), to keeping the hospitals empty, to then just keeping people from dying. During all of this they also changed the guidance from two doses to three. And now with high death rates in countries with vaccination rates approaching 90% what is the justification? Maybe it is just get vaccinated so Pfizer can make 50 billion dollars this year?

Well, the cases would most likely be about the same considering they don’t keep one from getting it or spreading it.