Search
Notices

C100 VBs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2017, 11:00 AM
  #211  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
As previously said, they were well constructed. Most pilots gloss over TDY and that is where pilots need to focus their concern on. Its not easy to see because its how using this or memorializing it affects other sections of the PWA and how the company can use them.
I don't see much of a issue with TDY. It's voluntary only and you bid below all the regular pilots in that category regardless of seniority. I don't see a lot of pilots wanting to bid to another base to sit reserve unless perhaps they live there. The company has not exactly leaped all over this one either.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 07-01-2017, 04:11 PM
  #212  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Taxi Driver
Posts: 411
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
I don't see much of a issue with TDY. It's voluntary only and you bid below all the regular pilots in that category regardless of seniority. I don't see a lot of pilots wanting to bid to another base to sit reserve unless perhaps they live there. The company has not exactly leaped all over this one either.
The company wanted these provisions, not the pilots. If they aren't turning out to be worthwhile, we should shut them down as soon as allowed. It's a trail run for expanding this to overseas bases, IMO, and that is a gigantic job killer.
Spudhauler is offline  
Old 07-01-2017, 04:14 PM
  #213  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Spudhauler View Post
The company wanted these provisions, not the pilots. If they aren't turning out to be worthwhile, we should shut them down as soon as allowed. It's a trail run for expanding this to overseas bases, IMO, and that is a gigantic job killer.
That's a really big leap. Unless are route system radically changes there is no need for a overseas base with the demise of NRT.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 07-01-2017, 04:56 PM
  #214  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,504
Default

Originally Posted by Spudhauler View Post
The company wanted these provisions, not the pilots. If they aren't turning out to be worthwhile, we should shut them down as soon as allowed. It's a trail run for expanding this to overseas bases, IMO, and that is a gigantic job killer.


Exactly. They are going to do almost nothing and then try to take down the pull down provision...If they get that then it will be full steam ahead.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
tunes is offline  
Old 07-01-2017, 06:24 PM
  #215  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Taxi Driver
Posts: 411
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
That's a really big leap. Unless are route system radically changes there is no need for a overseas base with the demise of NRT.
No, it isn't. Remember the days of "it's only a few RJs?" I sure do; they were hiring like crazy into them while 1300 of my southern brothers and sisters plus hundreds of our northern brothers and sisters withered away on furlough. If there is no need for it internationally and it isn't viable domestically, it needs to go as soon as the contract allows.
Spudhauler is offline  
Old 07-02-2017, 04:24 AM
  #216  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Spudhauler View Post
No, it isn't. Remember the days of "it's only a few RJs?" I sure do; they were hiring like crazy into them while 1300 of my southern brothers and sisters plus hundreds of our northern brothers and sisters withered away on furlough. If there is no need for it internationally and it isn't viable domestically, it needs to go as soon as the contract allows.
I never remember it's only a few RJ's. I took the time to read those contracts and knew exactly how many were coming. Same with both these provisions. Trying to link the two makes zero sense.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 07-02-2017, 07:13 AM
  #217  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Taxi Driver
Posts: 411
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
I never remember it's only a few RJ's. I took the time to read those contracts and knew exactly how many were coming. Same with both these provisions. Trying to link the two makes zero sense.
Spoken like someone who never had to deal with getting furloughed while thousands were hired into replacement jets. I'm glad you avoided that, but to pretend it didn't happen and we didn't turn a blind eye until it was too late is to ignore history. I'm not saying the TDY and VB stuff is the same, but the analogy is appropriate. Management put this in for a reason and are looking at the long game, while we look at the short term pay increases. We need to be forward thinking, and if these truly show themselves to be something that company doesn't need, they should go away as soon as contractually allowed.
Spudhauler is offline  
Old 07-02-2017, 08:21 AM
  #218  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 794
Default

Honest question. Virtual Bases are voluntary. The union could effectively make them useless at any time if they were deemed harmful to the pilot group by instructing the pilot union as a whole not to bid them right? It doesn't seem like the company can "get away" with anything if it is voluntary. What am I missing?
4fans is offline  
Old 07-02-2017, 08:31 AM
  #219  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by 4fans View Post
Honest question. Virtual Bases are voluntary. The union could effectively make them useless at any time if they were deemed harmful to the pilot group by instructing the pilot union as a whole not to bid them right? It doesn't seem like the company can "get away" with anything if it is voluntary. What am I missing?
Forum hysteria!
sailingfun is offline  
Old 07-02-2017, 08:34 AM
  #220  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Spudhauler View Post
Spoken like someone who never had to deal with getting furloughed while thousands were hired into replacement jets. I'm glad you avoided that, but to pretend it didn't happen and we didn't turn a blind eye until it was too late is to ignore history. I'm not saying the TDY and VB stuff is the same, but the analogy is appropriate. Management put this in for a reason and are looking at the long game, while we look at the short term pay increases. We need to be forward thinking, and if these truly show themselves to be something that company doesn't need, they should go away as soon as contractually allowed.
So if the company needs them we should make them permanent? They drop dead at the end of the test period automatically. We don't even need to pull it down. Regardless they are a non event.
sailingfun is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices