C Series Info
#1371
That makes sense. The 757 is too narrow to compete with the 321 for passenger comfort. The 767NG is a wider cross section and a higher ratio of aisle to middle seats. Better passenger comfort and more options for premium seat pricing would make it attractive. You could also turn a twin aisle faster. Have you every timed how long it takes to empty out a 757-300?
#1372
New Hire
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Position: Concourse A
Posts: 782
That makes sense. The 757 is too narrow to compete with the 321 for passenger comfort. The 767NG is a wider cross section and a higher ratio of aisle to middle seats. Better passenger comfort and more options for premium seat pricing would make it attractive. You could also turn a twin aisle faster. Have you every timed how long it takes to empty out a 757-300?
#1373
#1375
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Posts: 1,410
That makes sense. The 757 is too narrow to compete with the 321 for passenger comfort. The 767NG is a wider cross section and a higher ratio of aisle to middle seats. Better passenger comfort and more options for premium seat pricing would make it attractive. You could also turn a twin aisle faster. Have you every timed how long it takes to empty out a 757-300?
#1377
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post