C Series Info
06-22-2017, 07:22 PM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
A couple of notes:
The main reason I fly DAL, is to avoid the CRJs and ERJ-130/145 aircraft.
I recently wanted to fly SFO-JFK, business class, on DAL. DAL had no seats available.
I flew AA on a new A-321, and got a lie-flat bed! I was surprised...WAY better than DAL's first/business domestic products.
I am VERY excited about the C series at DAL, and will be flying them whenever possible. It will be even better than some widebody aircraft. I recently flew Hawaiian HNL-SEA, in coach in an A-330. Pitiful...
The "C" would be WAY, WAY better than the A-330, for a coach pax...
The main reason I fly DAL, is to avoid the CRJs and ERJ-130/145 aircraft.
I recently wanted to fly SFO-JFK, business class, on DAL. DAL had no seats available.
I flew AA on a new A-321, and got a lie-flat bed! I was surprised...WAY better than DAL's first/business domestic products.
I am VERY excited about the C series at DAL, and will be flying them whenever possible. It will be even better than some widebody aircraft. I recently flew Hawaiian HNL-SEA, in coach in an A-330. Pitiful...
The "C" would be WAY, WAY better than the A-330, for a coach pax...
06-22-2017, 09:36 PM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,236
Originally Posted by David Puddy
Would make sense with large corporate customers in the area. How about LGA-London City (LCY) flights? Or what about HPN-LCY? Talk about a business-friendly flights... They are doable in the CS100 - check out this video at LCY:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkOSe7gZLPI
Other potential doable city pairs from business-friendly LGA:
LGA-SNA
LGA-SEA
LGA-SAN
LGA-ONT
LGA-BUR
LGA-OAK
LGA-PDX
LGA-PHX
You never know... With the versatility of the CS100, the route planners are no doubt excited about the possibilities.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkOSe7gZLPI
Other potential doable city pairs from business-friendly LGA:
LGA-SNA
LGA-SEA
LGA-SAN
LGA-ONT
LGA-BUR
LGA-OAK
LGA-PDX
LGA-PHX
You never know... With the versatility of the CS100, the route planners are no doubt excited about the possibilities.
The long thin route takes the airframe off the schedule for 4-5 hours or half the day, for 110 pax. Hard to get enough per ticket to justify.
06-22-2017, 10:25 PM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Originally Posted by Scoop
Thats the way you do it!
Scoop
Scoop
And he's up there, what's that? Hawaiian noises?
You bangin' on the bongos like a chimpanzee
Hey Scoop, are we merging with Hawaiian? It's in the song.
06-23-2017, 04:21 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Dreamniner
Posts: 352
Originally Posted by FL370esq
All awesome locations (well, maybe not OAK so much) but isn't LaGuardia still subject to the 1,500 mile perimeter rule? I know there has been talk to lift it in conjunction with the terminal remodeling but I still think it is in effect.
And I think Forgot To Bid has been privy to the actual DL CSeries route structure. 😁
And I think Forgot To Bid has been privy to the actual DL CSeries route structure. 😁
06-23-2017, 06:06 AM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Posts: 1,410
Originally Posted by atpcliff
A couple of notes:
The main reason I fly DAL, is to avoid the CRJs and ERJ-130/145 aircraft.
I recently wanted to fly SFO-JFK, business class, on DAL. DAL had no seats available.
I flew AA on a new A-321, and got a lie-flat bed! I was surprised...WAY better than DAL's first/business domestic products.
I am VERY excited about the C series at DAL, and will be flying them whenever possible. It will be even better than some widebody aircraft. I recently flew Hawaiian HNL-SEA, in coach in an A-330. Pitiful...
The "C" would be WAY, WAY better than the A-330, for a coach pax...
The main reason I fly DAL, is to avoid the CRJs and ERJ-130/145 aircraft.
I recently wanted to fly SFO-JFK, business class, on DAL. DAL had no seats available.
I flew AA on a new A-321, and got a lie-flat bed! I was surprised...WAY better than DAL's first/business domestic products.
I am VERY excited about the C series at DAL, and will be flying them whenever possible. It will be even better than some widebody aircraft. I recently flew Hawaiian HNL-SEA, in coach in an A-330. Pitiful...
The "C" would be WAY, WAY better than the A-330, for a coach pax...
06-23-2017, 07:03 AM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,320
Originally Posted by qball
The DAL model seems to be...put in as many seats as possible while still maintaining a First/Business class. I doubt we will see anything like what AA provides in a domestic single aisle aircraft. AA has a nice product for transcons but I wonder if it is paying out for them.
06-23-2017, 07:13 AM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Posts: 1,410
Originally Posted by sailingfun
Part of the reason AA has so few seats in their transcons A321's is they can't go transcons in the winter with more seats. Jet Blue made the same choice. Delta is shifting to more and more lieflat seating in the transcon markets.
At least we now have economy comfort in the 50 seaters...so we've got that going for us
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
