Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
August SILS - 40 hours.... >

August SILS - 40 hours....

Search
Notices

August SILS - 40 hours....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2018, 06:38 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,397
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
They are trying to get around paying guys full reserve guarantee. Not exactly black and white, but the political grandstanders seem to be out in full swing trying to make it as such.
Well of course the company is trying to reduce paying reserve guarantee. The "win win" (if that's not too dirty a word) for the pilots bidding SILs is that they still can get half a month's pay for having a pulse and no other obligation to the company. Pretty good gig for some.

Why the MEC would want to torpedo this is beyond me, especially when no one had any issues at all when the company was offering KLOAs that paid zero hours.

Just another random "controversy of the week" generated by this strangely inept MEC, to either spin up the masses, or create a false tough guy facade.
Herkflyr is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 06:47 PM
  #22  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr View Post
Well of course the company is trying to reduce paying reserve guarantee. The "win win" (if that's not too dirty a word) for the pilots bidding SILs is that they still can get half a month's pay for having a pulse and no other obligation to the company. Pretty good gig for some.

Why the MEC would want to torpedo this is beyond me, especially when no one had any issues at all when the company was offering KLOAs that paid zero hours.

Just another random "controversy of the week" generated by this strangely inept MEC, to either spin up the masses, or create a false tough guy facade.
It's not black and white, though. They tried 20 hours, which the now deposed SC chair agreed to. I disagree with the assessment of the MEC just torpedoing it. The company didn't follow protocol in implementing it and just bypassed the union, which is not contractual. The sort of bad behavior we've seen is routinely associated with the company behaving just as belligerently as the current MEC supposedly is. (350 delivery, 350 SLIs, not paying reroute for the ATL fire IROP and so on)
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 08:28 PM
  #23  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by SideSticker View Post
I think your on to something. Maybe we could rig Arcos to alow everyony to bid on open time. I dont have any trouble doing that trip for 1.5x pay, instead of a 2x greenslip.If im the low bidder, I might just get the trip. Hopefully no-one under bids me, but I suppose that would be their individual choice.
You could white slip for 1x pay. So I guess the market does decide when someone who could ws does gs.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 09:46 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,275
Default

Originally Posted by TED74 View Post
I don't believe it was included in the memo, but apparently there is some heart burn about the company jumping to this pressure relief valve when they are overmanned while taking zero inputs from the RCC. In other words, they could easily accommodate RCC inputs to give pilots the trip changes pilots are seeking when in this state (and improve the operation, reliability and IROP recovery) but they choose not to. If the company doesn't scratch our backs, maybe we don't scratch theirs (and pull SILs down). Those pilots who wanted the SILs would unfortunately be caught in such crossfire...but if the pressure worked, perhaps rotation quality would improve and we'd be a happier bunch across the fleet.
There are a few categories where they are not using RCC inputs. Those categories should not have SILs.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 02:28 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,101
Default

For categories offering SILS why not just bid reserve? Better pay, and you may fly once..I just flew with a reserve in a SIL category and he had not flown in over a month.
3 green is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 03:15 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 609
Default

Originally Posted by 3 green View Post
For categories offering SILS why not just bid reserve? Better pay, and you may fly once..I just flew with a reserve in a SIL category and he had not flown in over a month.
You are still obligated for 18 days of on call. Including a bunch of short calls. If you live in base and just want to stay home that’s probably the way to go. If you commute or want to do some traveling with the time off the SIL might be a good option for some.
Rooster435 is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 03:21 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

It’s important to note that the MEC chairman works for our reps.

He is not the dictator.

The reps were briefed and the Chairman took direction. Then led the will of the body.

Our reps are second to none and they are very reasonable intelligent people.
gzsg is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 03:35 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,397
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
There are a few categories where they are not using RCC inputs. Those categories should not have SILs.
You know that's a good point. I'm not sure how the company completely disregards the RCC inputs, then posts SILs for the same category.

ATL M88A is a good example. The 88 bid package is so bad for July (90+% 4-5 day trips in a purely domestic category) that it actually prompted one of the few Council 44 communications signed by all four reps.

Now for August the company is offering 62 ATL M88A SILs.
Herkflyr is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 03:46 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 609
Default

It’s based on the lowest common denominator. So if the Bs are way under manned then that drives the bid pack.

But you’re right, if both As and Bs are offered SILS and the company disregarded the RCC inputs then that’s a foul.
Rooster435 is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 04:57 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 350
Default

Originally Posted by MJP27 View Post
The company is offering pilots a chance to voluntarily stay home all month for 40 hours of pay (over the summer no less) and our MEC is probably going to shut it down. Talk about looking a gift horse in the mouth.
Me, me, me, me, me........ not very uniony.
Fredturbo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
Stimpy the Kat
Kalitta Companies
77
12-03-2016 08:24 AM
Cheddar
United
98
05-30-2013 04:51 AM
Boogie Nights
Major
23
05-15-2012 05:55 AM
FR8Hauler
Cargo
80
08-22-2009 07:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices