August SILS - 40 hours....
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,397
Why the MEC would want to torpedo this is beyond me, especially when no one had any issues at all when the company was offering KLOAs that paid zero hours.
Just another random "controversy of the week" generated by this strangely inept MEC, to either spin up the masses, or create a false tough guy facade.
#22
Well of course the company is trying to reduce paying reserve guarantee. The "win win" (if that's not too dirty a word) for the pilots bidding SILs is that they still can get half a month's pay for having a pulse and no other obligation to the company. Pretty good gig for some.
Why the MEC would want to torpedo this is beyond me, especially when no one had any issues at all when the company was offering KLOAs that paid zero hours.
Just another random "controversy of the week" generated by this strangely inept MEC, to either spin up the masses, or create a false tough guy facade.
Why the MEC would want to torpedo this is beyond me, especially when no one had any issues at all when the company was offering KLOAs that paid zero hours.
Just another random "controversy of the week" generated by this strangely inept MEC, to either spin up the masses, or create a false tough guy facade.
#23
I think your on to something. Maybe we could rig Arcos to alow everyony to bid on open time. I dont have any trouble doing that trip for 1.5x pay, instead of a 2x greenslip.If im the low bidder, I might just get the trip. Hopefully no-one under bids me, but I suppose that would be their individual choice.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,275
I don't believe it was included in the memo, but apparently there is some heart burn about the company jumping to this pressure relief valve when they are overmanned while taking zero inputs from the RCC. In other words, they could easily accommodate RCC inputs to give pilots the trip changes pilots are seeking when in this state (and improve the operation, reliability and IROP recovery) but they choose not to. If the company doesn't scratch our backs, maybe we don't scratch theirs (and pull SILs down). Those pilots who wanted the SILs would unfortunately be caught in such crossfire...but if the pressure worked, perhaps rotation quality would improve and we'd be a happier bunch across the fleet.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 609
You are still obligated for 18 days of on call. Including a bunch of short calls. If you live in base and just want to stay home that’s probably the way to go. If you commute or want to do some traveling with the time off the SIL might be a good option for some.
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
It’s important to note that the MEC chairman works for our reps.
He is not the dictator.
The reps were briefed and the Chairman took direction. Then led the will of the body.
Our reps are second to none and they are very reasonable intelligent people.
He is not the dictator.
The reps were briefed and the Chairman took direction. Then led the will of the body.
Our reps are second to none and they are very reasonable intelligent people.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,397
ATL M88A is a good example. The 88 bid package is so bad for July (90+% 4-5 day trips in a purely domestic category) that it actually prompted one of the few Council 44 communications signed by all four reps.
Now for August the company is offering 62 ATL M88A SILs.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 609
It’s based on the lowest common denominator. So if the Bs are way under manned then that drives the bid pack.
But you’re right, if both As and Bs are offered SILS and the company disregarded the RCC inputs then that’s a foul.
But you’re right, if both As and Bs are offered SILS and the company disregarded the RCC inputs then that’s a foul.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 350
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post