Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Pay Banding in C2019... >

Pay Banding in C2019...

Search
Notices

Pay Banding in C2019...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2018, 04:09 PM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq View Post
Bigger still pays more and biggest still pays the most. We will just have fewer "biggest" than the other two majors based upon the trajectory of our international flying. However, our new lower costs = more profit sharing so it's a 1:1 wash. 😂

And that's the kind of math our old marketing team used when they sold tickets at a loss but made up the difference on volume 🤔
Annnnnnnd, if they ever get the same CA/FO ratio that we have on augmented crews, they will blow us out of the water. Just imagine our fleet of the future as is in the works right now: 15 350s. A bunch of 330s; (but not as many as UAL has 777s.), about 150 A321s and on down in size.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 10-17-2018, 04:10 PM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond View Post
mmmmmmmm not really. It is paying a pilot for his time on the property. Haven't you ever wondered why our pay scales only go to 12 years? I certainly have never heard a good reason. "It's always been that way".

Let me ask you this; What is going to happen when the 777s go away? Have you seen ANY indication whatsoever that DAL is interested in any more? Ever? Now we have the rumor of the 10 deferred 350s being turned into 330s. How does that figure into the bigger pays more scheme?
The 12 year scale is an easy one. You make more over a career with a 12 year scale than a longer one even if it were to top out slightly higher (wouldn't be much). With a higher top out timeframe lower years just end up making less so it's better to get to top pay sooner and have the money than try to send it to the back end of a career. I like the 12 year scale.

For the rest, rumors are rumors and that's it. If we went to a fully A330 International fleet we'd negotiate accordingly. We haven't converted the deferred 350s to 330s and we still have 777s with no actual evidence supporting parking them.
Baradium is offline  
Old 10-17-2018, 04:13 PM
  #153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond View Post
Annnnnnnd, if they ever get the same CA/FO ratio that we have on augmented crews, they will blow us out of the water. Just imagine our fleet of the future as is in the works right now: 15 350s. A bunch of 330s; (but not as many as UAL has 777s.), about 150 A321s and on down in size.
Good thing they already gave up that concession then, huh? They sold those top paying jobs for FO positions already so that's a mighty big if.
Baradium is offline  
Old 10-17-2018, 04:44 PM
  #154  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium View Post
The 12 year scale is an easy one. You make more over a career with a 12 year scale than a longer one even if it were to top out slightly higher (wouldn't be much). With a higher top out timeframe lower years just end up making less so it's better to get to top pay sooner and have the money than try to send it to the back end of a career. I like the 12 year scale.

For the rest, rumors are rumors and that's it. If we went to a fully A330 International fleet we'd negotiate accordingly. We haven't converted the deferred 350s to 330s and we still have 777s with no actual evidence supporting parking them.
The 777s WILL die eventually. True that it is not real soon, but eventually they will.

And you think DAL management will pay comparable rates for DAL 330s vs UAL 777s? Seriously? Because that is what you are saying will happen if MY prediction comes true.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 10-17-2018, 04:46 PM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium View Post
Good thing they already gave up that concession then, huh? They sold those top paying jobs for FO positions already so that's a mighty big if.
I suppose. Of course I am sure they have no desire whatsoever to get what we have.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 10-17-2018, 05:10 PM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,920
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond View Post
And you think DAL management will pay comparable rates for DAL 330s vs UAL 777s? Seriously? Because that is what you are saying will happen if MY prediction comes true.
With our superior, pensionable profit sharing over the last few years, have our 330 captains not made a higher effective rate than UAL's 777 captains?
TED74 is offline  
Old 10-17-2018, 06:20 PM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond View Post
The 777s WILL die eventually. True that it is not real soon, but eventually they will.

And you think DAL management will pay comparable rates for DAL 330s vs UAL 777s? Seriously? Because that is what you are saying will happen if MY prediction comes true.
At least right now, it seems the actual cash outlay is at least as much and likely higher.

There is a lot more to compensation than the published hourly rate. You talk as if we don't make as much as our peers in the industry.
Baradium is offline  
Old 10-17-2018, 06:22 PM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by TED74 View Post
With our superior, pensionable profit sharing over the last few years, have our 330 captains not made a higher effective rate than UAL's 777 captains?
I keep being told that the amount we actually take home doesn't matter as much. It's that published hourly rate that is important.
Baradium is offline  
Old 10-17-2018, 11:13 PM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: Power top
Posts: 2,959
Default

The music will stop. History repeats itself. Profit sharing won't mean squat. Get your pay rates and PS is extra.
Hank Kingsley is offline  
Old 10-18-2018, 01:02 AM
  #160  
Optimized
 
Gooner's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 392
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
There will be cases where smaller aircraft will replace larger. The overall trend however is upsizing. It’s managements plan and is a virtual certainty industry wide given the basically fixed infrastructure with runways and gates. The company is making a substantial investment in the 777’s as we speak. They are going to be around for a long time. When they leave the fleet there will be a replacement. What is happening daily is MD88’s are being replaced with A321’s and 737-900’s. Some of the A330 Neo’s will replace 767’s. Our 737-800’s will almost certainly be replaced with A321neo’s.
None of those reasons is pilot cost. We are egotistical in assuming that a large portion of the cost to every flight is the pilot, it’s a key factor but not the determining factor. Let’s get pilot compensation at a set level that rewards us all and let management figure out what planes to fly on what routes. Let’s start with 2-3 levels of pay banding and go from there.
Gooner is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
prior121
Regional
1912
07-31-2016 06:49 PM
MikeF16
Delta
179
02-03-2016 08:22 PM
Schwanker
Delta
306
01-14-2016 11:09 AM
notEnuf
Delta
238
12-22-2015 04:20 AM
LCAL dude
United
17
10-02-2012 02:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices