Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Pay Banding in C2019... >

Pay Banding in C2019...

Search
Notices

Pay Banding in C2019...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2018, 05:28 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Han Solo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Fastest Hunk of Junk in the Galaxy
Posts: 1,657
Default

Originally Posted by DoubleTrouble View Post
Huge productivity concession that never stops producing on the management side.

Usually advocated by pilots who can’t hold anything bigger than the 7ER and want 765 pay.

To the OP: the pay disparity is a reflection of the productivity difference in number of employees (in this case 2-4 pilots) moving greater number of seats/cargo.

For me to vote yes on this I will need to see a much larger pay raise than I expect. Or some other dramatic improvement over what we would get without it.

Will pilotless jets have this same conversation in a few decades?
I would say this is advocated by pilots who don't WANT to hold 765. I tried international and didn't like it which means I'll likely never hold a pay rate higher than 7er by choice. Having 7er banded to 777 would be a benefit for senior pilots who just don't like WB flying.


Originally Posted by gzsg View Post
Remember the United pilots have all seniority list instructors. Do you think management will eliminate DGS instructors?
I just flew with an FO about to go to the 737 (I think that's where he was going) who told me there is no systems course anymore, he did LMS online for IQ and was told that on day 1 there would be a 1 hour Q&A followed by the ESV. It is obvious DAL management considers training an undesirable expense, not an important part of creating a quality Delta pilot. DGS is a cheap alternative to an SLI, no-way no-how does management give up DGS. A real shame since our SLIs are SO much better than DGS.

Originally Posted by LumberJack View Post
Pay banding is a huge benefit to the company and QOL hit for the pilots. If it's in the next contract, I'm going to need some massive improvements across the board.

And to all the people posting specific hours and pay you'd be willing to accept, please stop. There is a long history of screenshots from this forum being used in negotiations against us.
Please provide an example of a post here that was screen shotted and used against us in negotiations.
Han Solo is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 05:55 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Just to be clear pay banding has not be shown at AMR or UAL to have much effect on the number of training events and as such does not produce a big benefit to the company. What the company is going to want to reduce training events is longer freezes. The company has had opportunity after oppoortunity to try and get pay banding and they have never asked. They know the numbers.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 05:58 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Posted HansSolo:

I would say this is advocated by pilots who don't WANT to hold 765. I tried international and didn't like it which means I'll likely never hold a pay rate higher than 7er by choice. Having 7er banded to 777 would be a benefit for senior pilots who just don't like WB flying.

UAL’s pay banding puts the 757 in a lower pay category than the 767ER. If we push paybanding Delta will want the same. There will be no widebody domestic flying or rates.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 06:17 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 59
Default

This is a huge noooope! Drastic decrease in quality of life and options for the pilot group. Please no
Yuuuup is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 06:35 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Han Solo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Fastest Hunk of Junk in the Galaxy
Posts: 1,657
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post

UAL’s pay banding puts the 757 in a lower pay category than the 767ER. If we push paybanding Delta will want the same. There will be no widebody domestic flying or rates.
I don’t disagree with your assessment.
Han Solo is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 06:53 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,909
Default

Having 767-400 be it's own category seems pretty dumb to me. If what I hear is accurate, a pilot going to that category learns all the 757/767 stuff anyway.

In our ever-expanding sea of fleet types, I think that consolidation would make sense. Trade the job losses for more and better-paid vacation... and pay all the ERs the -400 rate!
TED74 is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 07:18 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg View Post
Remember the United pilots have all seniority list instructors. Do you think management will eliminate DGS instructors?
Even accounting for that we have more CAs per airframe.
Baradium is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 08:20 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,414
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Posted HansSolo:

I would say this is advocated by pilots who don't WANT to hold 765. I tried international and didn't like it which means I'll likely never hold a pay rate higher than 7er by choice. Having 7er banded to 777 would be a benefit for senior pilots who just don't like WB flying.

UAL’s pay banding puts the 757 in a lower pay category than the 767ER. If we push paybanding Delta will want the same. There will be no widebody domestic flying or rates.
Correct. AA pays the 757 at ER rates. We definitely would want that.
Trip7 is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 08:32 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tummy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 218
Default

Just so I'm clear, there are some pilots who are opposed to bringing the 330 rate up to the 350 rate? There are some pilots who are opposed to bringing the 765 rate up to the 777 rate?
Tummy is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 08:35 AM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by TED74 View Post
Having 767-400 be it's own category seems pretty dumb to me. If what I hear is accurate, a pilot going to that category learns all the 757/767 stuff anyway.

In our ever-expanding sea of fleet types, I think that consolidation would make sense. Trade the job losses for more and better-paid vacation... and pay all the ERs the -400 rate!
It’s a 757/767 type with a 777 cockpit. Go figure. Could be one category but recency would have to be tracked and applied in both the ER category and the 400 category per the faa so that’s why company just has separate types.
full of luv is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
prior121
Regional
1912
07-31-2016 06:49 PM
MikeF16
Delta
179
02-03-2016 08:22 PM
Schwanker
Delta
306
01-14-2016 11:09 AM
notEnuf
Delta
238
12-22-2015 04:20 AM
LCAL dude
United
17
10-02-2012 02:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices