Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   717 phase out? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/120677-717-phase-out.html)

Mesabah 03-23-2019 01:47 PM


Originally Posted by Planetrain (Post 2788294)
Aren’t the 767 and 787 virtually the same size? BA wouldn’t want to build a cheap 767NEO if it was a sales threat to the 787.

http://i65.tinypic.com/nbenmq.jpg


The case for the 797 would be a dual isle aircraft that burns less than the 757 it is replacing, and is sized enough to replace the 767. As sailingfun said months ago, the Asian carriers want cargo space, so they will opt for the 787 anyway. The case for the 797 is pretty small.


As a side note, the A350neo is going to be offered for sale soon. I expect Delta to get that plane.

Baradium 03-23-2019 02:03 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 2788302)
They are not. The 787-800 seats more than the 767-300 and has a almost 100,000 lb higher gross weight. The 787-900 which is what should be compared to the 767-300 ER seats substantially more and has almost 150,000 lb higher takeoff weight.

So why aren't we comparing the 787-800 to the 767-300ER?

sailingfun 03-23-2019 02:24 PM


Originally Posted by Baradium (Post 2788319)
So why aren't we comparing the 787-800 to the 767-300ER?

It should be compared with the 767-200. Comparing a stretched version with a base version is not apples to apples.

Baradium 03-23-2019 02:39 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 2788327)
It should be compared with the 767-200. Comparing a stretched version with a base version is not apples to apples.

How many 767-200s are still around in passenger service vs 767-300s?

If the stretched version of one is of a similar size as the base version of another it is quite valid to compare them to each other.

By your logic the 757-200 shouldn't ever be compared to the 737-900 when discussing performance.

Mesabah 03-23-2019 02:52 PM

There really is no value for Delta to purchase any Boeing aircraft going forward. The discussion is probably moot. I would look at the A225, A321XLR, and A350neo as the next purchases by 2025. Further boosting the maintenance relationship with Airbus should also be a major priority. Dump the CRJ 200s, 767s, 717s, 757s, 777s, all MDs, and some 73 7/8s.

sailingfun 03-23-2019 02:53 PM


Originally Posted by Baradium (Post 2788335)
How many 767-200s are still around in passenger service vs 767-300s?

If the stretched version of one is of a similar size as the base version of another it is quite valid to compare them to each other.

By your logic the 757-200 shouldn't ever be compared to the 737-900 when discussing performance.

There won’t be very many 787-800’s in service in 20 years. Hardly any are being sold now.

Planetrain 03-23-2019 02:54 PM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 2788308)
http://i65.tinypic.com/nbenmq.jpg


The case for the 797 would be a dual isle aircraft that burns less than the 757 it is replacing, and is sized enough to replace the 767. As sailingfun said months ago, the Asian carriers want cargo space, so they will opt for the 787 anyway. The case for the 797 is pretty small.


As a side note, the A350neo is going to be offered for sale soon. I expect Delta to get that plane.

That’s a neat graphic. Didn’t really understand the differences. MOM looks pretty good for us - business case for BA, not so much. :(

n9810f 03-24-2019 07:41 PM

Great. Let's just change branding to Air France.


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 2788346)
There really is no value for Delta to purchase any Boeing aircraft going forward. The discussion is probably moot. I would look at the A225, A321XLR, and A350neo as the next purchases by 2025. Further boosting the maintenance relationship with Airbus should also be a major priority. Dump the CRJ 200s, 767s, 717s, 757s, 777s, all MDs, and some 73 7/8s.


forgot to bid 03-25-2019 03:14 AM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 2788346)
There really is no value for Delta to purchase any Boeing aircraft going forward. The discussion is probably moot. I would look at the A225, A321XLR, and A350neo as the next purchases by 2025. Further boosting the maintenance relationship with Airbus should also be a major priority. Dump the CRJ 200s, 767s, 717s, 757s, 777s, all MDs, and some 73 7/8s.

We need the 225, but Airbus doesn't. Neither does the rest of the world. Just us.

We paraded our 717s and 90s around as an alternative to buying new technology, which we are just too good to do, and in a blink of an eye watched the neos get 6000 orders and the max 5000, for 11000 total. Of which we secured 100 321neos and an option for 100 more. Out of 11000. But we have 90s and 71s! Whoops.

I think we kind of screwed up.

And I think Airbus will balk at replacing the 320neo with the 225 especially if the max really takes a long term beating and the 320neo keeps printing money for Airbus. And by the time the 225 is designed and tested it's based on a 25 year old design that doesn't match the thousands of other Buses, and Airbus loves to promote commonality.

If Airbus wanted something new they'd probably design it themselves, they have the money. And they're not even working on it. We need to buy 320neos, while we can.

forgot to bid 03-25-2019 03:26 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 2789339)
We need the 225, but Airbus doesn't. Neither does the rest of the world. Just us.

.

Actually, you know who needs the 225?

Boeing.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:47 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands