![]() |
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 2892604)
Finally! Here's the link. Hope this helps maintain SCOPE compliance.
https://news.delta.com/delta-continu...trans-atlantic Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2892646)
Is Copahagen a new destination or have we always done that in the Summer?
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk |
First of all, with additional 330s, I believe there is expansion going on but as far as the 767-400s go.......where were they flying before they went into modifications? Did we still fly to those destinations or were there some that were dropped and now are coming back?
Denny |
Expanded service should mean expanded positions flying those WBs. I haven't seen any AE that was better than neutral when it comes to WB flying.
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2892646)
Is Copahagen a new destination or have we always done that in the Summer?
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 2892771)
We flew JFK/CPH years ago. Nothing new.
So, if we started flying all those routes ....and the many others that I didn’t list, your comment would be....nothing new( the insinuation being that it’s not “growth”.....nothing more than a re-capture of status quo)? We still might have some Pan Am guys here.....using your metric, if we picked up round-the-world flights, it would be “Nothing new”? At the expense of being called an out of touch company cheerleader, I’ll just say.....”It’s good, I’m glad to see the—————!” |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 2892711)
First of all, with additional 330s, I believe there is expansion going on but as far as the 767-400s go.......where were they flying before they went into modifications? Did we still fly to those destinations or were there some that were dropped and now are coming back?
So I'd say that the 767-400 is going back to it's old flying, we'll see what the -200s do next. |
Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
(Post 2892782)
So, if we started flying all those routes ....and the many others that I didn’t list, your comment would be....nothing new( the insinuation being that it’s not “growth”.....nothing more than a re-capture of status quo)?
We still might have some Pan Am guys here.....using your metric, if we picked up round-the-world flights, it would be “Nothing new”? |
Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
(Post 2892782)
I guess it’s all relative. We use to fly Budapest, Bucharest, Amman, Cairo, New Delhi, Mumbai, Kiev, Moscow, St Petersburg....the list goes on and on. We also use to have a hub in Frankfurt. What about Palau, Guam, Saipan, Osaka, Nagoya, Bangkok, Hong Kong, Hanoi ?
So, if we started flying all those routes ....and the many others that I didn’t list, your comment would be....nothing new( the insinuation being that it’s not “growth”.....nothing more than a re-capture of status quo)? We still might have some Pan Am guys here.....using your metric, if we picked up round-the-world flights, it would be “Nothing new”? At the expense of being called an out of touch company cheerleader, I’ll just say.....”It’s good, I’m glad to see the—————!” |
The crux of the whole “argument” is not the semantics of what it’s called. The meat of the matter is, “Is international flying increasing, decreasing, or stagnant” ?
The answer is....it depends upon what your metric/time frame is From where I started it increased from a new hire, prolly decreased after Pan Am merger hey-day, increased prior to bankruptcy, decreased after the DL/NW merger........and now increasing from about 2015. Like I said....to me it’s relative.....but (the good news) is that Delta is increasing international airframes, which I applaud. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:08 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands