![]() |
Originally Posted by 20Fathoms
(Post 2894478)
The LR really is a pretty unique bird and the addition of Mumbai flying has made it even more indispensable. I know they tried to put the A350 on Sydney but ended up not doing it. Like others have said, our ERs could easily be replaced by A350s but that would leave a fleet of only 10 aircraft. Has Delta ever had an orphan fleet that small?
|
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 2894588)
Ya, the early 747's and a few years with 5 DC-10s. (1011 place holder)
|
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 2894313)
I love that we have a deal nobody heard a whisper about, but people still trust the whispers about 787.
14 more 350s? This is good for the 787! |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2894630)
There were whispers of good things coming. I posted that on here in early August.
|
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 2894746)
If I had a nickel for every “good things are coming” rumor in aviation...
Free beer.....tomorrow! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 2894471)
according to wikipedia the ULR has a 44,000 gal fuel capacity. airbus press release matches this #
|
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 2894313)
I love that we have a deal nobody heard a whisper about, but people still trust the whispers about 787.
14 more 350s? This is good for the 787! Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by DELTAFO
(Post 2894768)
They turned a cargo bin into a fuel tank to get that capacity.
I'm told Delta's problem isn't fuel capacity though....it's a max gross weight issue. The payload optimized flights leave with the ability to carry an extra 30-40K in fuel but can't because they are taxiing out at Max Gross Weight. |
Originally Posted by FL370esq
(Post 2894784)
Oddly, they didn't. They just used more space in the existing wing tanks to cram in an extra 7,000 gallons or so.
I'm told Delta's problem isn't fuel capacity though....it's a max gross weight issue. The payload optimized flights leave with the ability to carry an extra 30-40K in fuel but can't because they are taxiing out at Max Gross Weight. |
Originally Posted by crewdawg
(Post 2894492)
Don't fly either, so I can verify, but guys on the other forum quoted the following mid flight fuel burns numbers.
777 = 8,000 pph 350 = 6,000-6,500 pph |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:15 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands