Search

Notices

Delta To Furlough?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2020 | 12:17 PM
  #1731  
Jaww's Avatar
Rerouted On Weekends
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
From: 717A
Default

Originally Posted by Starscream
And, of course, if furloughing for xx months is cost neutral with keeping people employed for xx months, the company will go down the ‘got your back’ path and keep people on the payroll, rather than spending the same money on hotels and training.
Im ok with that.
Reply
Old 05-07-2020 | 01:00 PM
  #1732  
Starscream's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 184
Likes: 1
From: B757/B767
Default

Originally Posted by Starscream
And, of course, if furloughing for xx months is cost neutral with keeping people employed for xx months, the company will go down the ‘got your back’ path and keep people on the payroll, rather than spending the same money on hotels and training.
Ha — forgot to add ‘’HOPEFULLY’’ the company will go down the ’got your back’ path....
Reply
Old 05-07-2020 | 01:20 PM
  #1733  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Starscream
And, of course, if furloughing for xx months is cost neutral with keeping people employed for xx months, the company will go down the ‘got your back’ path and keep people on the payroll, rather than spending the same money on hotels and training.
Wrong. I've heard this argument too many times. To bank on break even furlough numbers is naive. Every airline will stem the losses to break even ASAP. By getting to cost neutral they hugely reduce risk of a slow recovery.

They will furlough as many as it takes to get into this position. If it ends up costing them a bit more in the future as things turn around it won't matter because there will be cash flowing in again.
Reply
Old 05-07-2020 | 01:41 PM
  #1734  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 743
Likes: 41
Default

Originally Posted by Aviator147
https://www.audriesaircraftanalysis....ff-reductions/



basic model shows Furlough break even point for company at 13 months. Add in some early out or SIL and it can stretch the break even point to 18 months. The fact we’re working on summer 2021 fleet plan should be good news. Still in the Time Bucket.
If Delta does a displacement like UALs, the break even point is more like 6 months. A Delta guy told me a month ago that was the plan. Push thousands to 717 and furlough from there. These 18 month break evens only play if the bump game is allowed. UAL proved they were smarter, unfortunately.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 05-07-2020 | 01:47 PM
  #1735  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 482
Default

Originally Posted by GPullR
If Delta does a displacement like UALs, the break even point is more like 6 months. A Delta guy told me a month ago that was the plan. Push thousands to 717 and furlough from there. These 18 month break evens only play if the bump game is allowed. UAL proved they were smarter, unfortunately.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Yep, take 13 months (or whatever you think break even would be) and subtract 6 months that the CAREs act has given airlines to get ready. So 6-7 months sounds about right.
Reply
Old 05-07-2020 | 03:05 PM
  #1736  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Yep, take 13 months (or whatever you think break even would be) and subtract 6 months that the CAREs act has given airlines to get ready. So 6-7 months sounds about right.

That’s not how math works. The cares grant money has nothing to do with furloughing. So if the break even is 13 months, then that’s it. The grant money doesn’t change if they furlough or not.
Reply
Old 05-07-2020 | 03:11 PM
  #1737  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,908
Likes: 694
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by ELAC321
Wrong. I've heard this argument too many times. To bank on break even furlough numbers is naive. Every airline will stem the losses to break even ASAP. By getting to cost neutral they hugely reduce risk of a slow recovery.

They will furlough as many as it takes to get into this position. If it ends up costing them a bit more in the future as things turn around it won't matter because there will be cash flowing in again.
Tourniquet for the bleeding will be the priority.

Anyone who's in a solid enough position might incur some risk lead turning the economy to be ready to grab market share. SWA maybe. Need some kind of trend vector to pull the trigger on that IMO... economic modelling seems like a crapshoot in this situation.
Reply
Old 05-07-2020 | 03:50 PM
  #1738  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by ELAC321
Wrong. I've heard this argument too many times. To bank on break even furlough numbers is naive. Every airline will stem the losses to break even ASAP. By getting to cost neutral they hugely reduce risk of a slow recovery.

They will furlough as many as it takes to get into this position. If it ends up costing them a bit more in the future as things turn around it won't matter because there will be cash flowing in again.
Then why not furlough 90% Oct 1st?
Reply
Old 05-07-2020 | 04:01 PM
  #1739  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 662
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by GPullR
If Delta does a displacement like UALs, the break even point is more like 6 months. A Delta guy told me a month ago that was the plan. Push thousands to 717 and furlough from there. These 18 month break evens only play if the bump game is allowed. UAL proved they were smarter, unfortunately.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
look at AAs displacement announcement today. No where near as drastic as United. We have less widebody flying than both. And while AA has more retirements , we are second behind them. We have more than double retirements of UA between now and 2024. I’d be shocked if we push “thousands” to the 717. We don’t even have the fleet plan so whatever that delta guy told you was just the rumor of the day.
Reply
Old 05-07-2020 | 04:06 PM
  #1740  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: 6th place
Default

Originally Posted by Aviator147
look at AAs displacement announcement today. No where near as drastic as United. We have less widebody flying than both. And while AA has more retirements , we are second behind them. We have more than double retirements of UA between now and 2024. I’d be shocked if we push “thousands” to the 717. We don’t even have the fleet plan so whatever that delta guy told you was just the rumor of the day.

AA also immediately lost 800 guys to early retirements. Not a huge deal, but definitely helped.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices