Search
Notices

Early Retirement?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2020, 06:08 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 336
Default

Originally Posted by vyperdriver View Post
I'd recommend Delta reinstate retirement for guys say 3000 ish and above on seniority list or whatever a good number would be at the 60%FAE. That would preserve the young guys (if it got that bad), fix the deadzoners argument, ensure a lower training thrash, no furloughs, etc.
I am good with that. I am about 56% on the list.
dc10guy is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 07:18 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: B737 FO
Posts: 665
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
Too many left small senior categories too soon to be replaced witout grounding planes or even one entire fleet, so supposedly it would have destroyed the airline by grounding panes due to no pilots until their replacements could be trained.
Wow. I still can't believe I'd never heard about that. Crazy.
BlueSkies is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 09:30 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DARR31's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 1 step fwd 2 steps back
Posts: 212
Default

Originally Posted by vyperdriver View Post
I'd recommend Delta reinstate retirement for guys say 3000 ish and above on seniority list or whatever a good number would be at the 60%FAE. That would preserve the young guys (if it got that bad), fix the deadzoners argument, ensure a lower training thrash, no furloughs, etc.
Why seniority and not based on age? Oh never mind!
DARR31 is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 11:53 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSkies View Post
Wow. I still can't believe I'd never heard about that. Crazy.
It was a time when things looked bleak and pilots over 50 vested in the retirement plan could take a lump sum of 1/2 the present value of their lifetime annuity so they did before that door closed. It resulted in many pilots of certain fleets leaving simultaneously which made the company/union work out a temp plan to let them fly (in retired status) until replacements could be trained.
full of luv is offline  
Old 03-15-2020, 02:37 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSkies View Post
Wow. I still can't believe I'd never heard about that. Crazy.
PRPs...not a pretty word is it H.I.?
FL370esq is offline  
Old 03-15-2020, 04:11 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,128
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq View Post
PRPs...not a pretty word is it H.I.?
Raising Arizona?
waldo135 is offline  
Old 03-15-2020, 04:27 AM
  #17  
FlySmarterNotHarder
 
UGBSM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: fifi flyer
Posts: 556
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq View Post
PRPs...not a pretty word is it H.I.?
Yeah, I remember the "perps". It was an effort (that the union stupidly agreed to) to stave off bankruptcy by letting the retired guys come back and fly. It didn't work.

And this was after the PRP's had bailed out with their lump sums causing a run on the bank contributing to our pension becoming under funded and failing.

It was really annoying to watch them "come back to save us all". What a joke it turned out to be.

There was a real atmosphere of fear and uncertainty surrounding the bankruptcy that caused some crazy ideas to surface. Remember Leo the Ceo and Michelle Burns bailing out with their SERPs and golden parachutes? I hope we are wiser today and can avoid some of that. Ed the head taking no salary is a good sign that maybe we won't repeat some mistakes from the past. JMO.

Last edited by UGBSM; 03-15-2020 at 04:38 AM.
UGBSM is offline  
Old 03-15-2020, 04:42 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,284
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSkies View Post
Wow. I still can't believe I'd never heard about that. Crazy.
The point of the PRP program where pilots could come back and fly was to quickly allow the company to early retire around 600 pilots. The average PRP pilot worked for 6 weeks past their scheduled retirement. A handful of check airman were able to stay for a year because of the FAA’s refusal to qualify more than 2 new LCA’s a month on the 767.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-15-2020, 04:44 AM
  #19  
FlySmarterNotHarder
 
UGBSM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: fifi flyer
Posts: 556
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
The point of the PRP program where pilots could come back and fly was to quickly allow the company to early retire around 600 pilots. The average PRP pilot worked for 6 weeks past their scheduled retirement. A handful of check airman were able to stay for a year because of the FAA’s refusal to qualify more than 2 new LCA’s a month on the 767.
It was a limited time program that the company wanted to extend. The union then said no. In hindsight, I still think it was unnecessary and guided by fear.
UGBSM is offline  
Old 03-15-2020, 04:46 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,284
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSkies View Post
Wow. I still can't believe I'd never heard about that. Crazy.
The point of the PRP program where pilots could come back and fly was to quickly allow the company to early retire around 600 pilots. The average PRP pilot worked for 6 weeks past their scheduled retirement. A handful of check airman were able to stay for a year because of the FAA’s refusal to qualify more than 2 new LCA’s a month on the 767.
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CompetentFool
FedEx
607
11-14-2017 03:19 PM
dckozak
FedEx
95
09-08-2015 08:29 PM
numbersguy
Cargo
91
03-11-2009 06:04 AM
joethepilot
Regional
101
02-05-2009 06:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices