Search
Notices

Early Retirement?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2020, 12:51 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 269
Default Early Retirement?

Apropos to the recent discussion.

https://www.fool.com/retirement/2020...market-vo.aspx
DrunkIrishman is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 03:07 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: 320A
Posts: 625
Default

I'd recommend Delta reinstate retirement for guys say 3000 ish and above on seniority list or whatever a good number would be at the 60%FAE. That would preserve the young guys (if it got that bad), fix the deadzoners argument, ensure a lower training thrash, no furloughs, etc.
vyperdriver is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 03:13 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,459
Default

For how long? Til 65? SILS would be more cost effective than a lifetime annuity. Losing 500-800 per year through normal retirements is crushing the training pipeline. Any early retirement offers would.have to be carefully managed. Balancing by fleet is an option, but that creates a seniority abrogation argument.
Gunfighter is online now  
Old 03-14-2020, 03:41 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by vyperdriver View Post
I'd recommend Delta reinstate retirement for guys say 3000 ish and above on seniority list or whatever a good number would be at the 60%FAE. That would preserve the young guys (if it got that bad), fix the deadzoners argument, ensure a lower training thrash, no furloughs, etc.
I'd like that plan!!! I'd be gone in a New York second! .....if I could hold it.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 03:45 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter View Post
For how long? Til 65? SILS would be more cost effective than a lifetime annuity. Losing 500-800 per year through normal retirements is crushing the training pipeline. Any early retirement offers would.have to be carefully managed. Balancing by fleet is an option, but that creates a seniority abrogation argument.
In no circumstance will there be any significant FAE to all pilots locked in for life at the recent high water marks. Million dollar 350 pilots, buddy bidding triple dippers, etc. Not for a private company anyway. Its not like we're a municipal government that can simply take it from the taxpayers.
gloopy is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 03:52 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 272
Default

Last time they had early retirements and furloughs. They ended up furloughing the bottom 1000 or so and brought back the early retired guys to fly at full pay while receiving full retirement pay. They were not even on our seniority list. The union condoned and endorsed this staffing solution.
daldude is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 05:37 PM
  #7  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Default

Originally Posted by vyperdriver View Post
I'd recommend Delta reinstate retirement for guys say 3000 ish and above on seniority list or whatever a good number would be at the 60%FAE. That would preserve the young guys (if it got that bad), fix the deadzoners argument, ensure a lower training thrash, no furloughs, etc.

How solid would a DB be? This whole crisis in my opinion just validates the value of a 401K. Yes the markets are tanking and 401s are taking a hit. But seeing how quickly the airlines can turn from wildly profitable to disaster would anyone feel secure with a “promise” of a DB? I would not.

If we had enough folks dependent on a DB the company would use it as golden handcuffs to get us to gut our PWA to save the DB. How much value would a 60+ year old Pilot put on QOL items or pay vs protecting the DB? How about a 63 year old Pilot? How much would they be willing to give away to protect the DB at all costs? I don’t blame them, I would probably think the same way if I were in that situation.

Finally how hard would it be for the company to dump the DB in times such as these? In my mind this whole Coronavirus issue highlights the shortcomings of a classic DB. Could we perhaps come up with some kind of different DB that is not subject to being liquidated? I have heard guys mention an annuity in everyone’s name but I am not sure of how much that would cost. I just have a suspicion that if we currently had a DB the company would have a lot more leverage over the Pilot group than they currently do.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 05:42 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: B737 FO
Posts: 664
Default

Originally Posted by daldude View Post
Last time they had early retirements and furloughs. They ended up furloughing the bottom 1000 or so and brought back the early retired guys to fly at full pay while receiving full retirement pay. They were not even on our seniority list. The union condoned and endorsed this staffing solution.
Wait, what? Can you give more details on this? (Not doubting, just never heard anything about this before)

How did that even make sense, aren't senior guys way more expensive than junior guys?
BlueSkies is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 05:47 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,242
Default

I took a early retirement in September of 2012. Three months pay and money in a Retirement Medical Account to pay for private health insurance until I turned 65. I was one month shy of 63 and got around 42K. I have stayed on my wife’s health insurance and still have about 25K left. Best thing I ever did.
maddogmax is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 05:47 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSkies View Post
Wait, what? Can you give more details on this? (Not doubting, just never heard anything about this before)

How did that even make sense, aren't senior guys way more expensive than junior guys?
Too many left small senior categories too soon to be replaced witout grounding planes or even one entire fleet, so supposedly it would have destroyed the airline by grounding panes due to no pilots until their replacements could be trained.
gloopy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CompetentFool
FedEx
607
11-14-2017 03:19 PM
dckozak
FedEx
95
09-08-2015 08:29 PM
numbersguy
Cargo
91
03-11-2009 06:04 AM
joethepilot
Regional
101
02-05-2009 06:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices