Search

Notices

Early Retirement?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2020 | 03:57 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley
Vanguard's 2020 target plan, retire now is about 50/50 equities and bonds. 2025, 60/40. So being near retirement with 40% equities is not haphazard.

That being said, senior guys are down 300 to 500k in a week
Except the ones that didnt have 300-500k to begin with😅
Reply
Old 03-15-2020 | 04:29 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
From: Power top
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ
Except the ones that didnt have 300-500k to begin with😅
Yeah, that was a stupid post. Lots of delta people are hurting more than me, sorry.
Reply
Old 03-16-2020 | 09:54 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Default

Question was asked today to ATL CPO during impromptu question and answer about early retirement. He said everything is being looked at right now, nothing is off the table.
Reply
Old 03-16-2020 | 10:58 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Default

Originally Posted by Shakinthefat
Question was asked today to ATL CPO during impromptu question and answer about early retirement. He said everything is being looked at right now, nothing is off the table.
From experience, please read that as; How bad can we hammer the pilots. The sad thing is they dump on the CPO's after the dirty work is done, Nothing new here.
Reply
Old 03-16-2020 | 11:15 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley
Vanguard's 2020 target plan, retire now is about 50/50 equities and bonds. 2025, 60/40. So being near retirement with 40% equities is not haphazard.

That being said, senior guys are down 300 to 500k in a week
Longer discussion than I have time for, but being at retirement with 50% or even 40% in equities is beyond idiotic.
Reply
Old 03-16-2020 | 11:38 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
From: Power top
Default

Originally Posted by Jay1122
Longer discussion than I have time for, but being at retirement with 50% or even 40% in equities is beyond idiotic.
You need to write a book. 100 minus your age was the old gouge. Some are saying 120 minus your age. That idea can be found in many references. So I respectfully disagree and so do many others
Reply
Old 03-16-2020 | 11:40 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

Im glad im broke. I couldnt take that kind of stress.
Reply
Old 03-16-2020 | 12:43 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: LAX 350 A
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSkies
Wait, what? Can you give more details on this? (Not doubting, just never heard anything about this before)

How did that even make sense, aren't senior guys way more expensive than junior guys?
It's one of the LOLs in the bankruptcy era. The were referred to as PRPs (post retirement pilots). The basically came back at the bottom of the seniority list but in their seat/equip at retirement. The argument was to save training costs.
Reply
Old 03-18-2020 | 03:16 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 107
From: Road construction signholder
Default

Originally Posted by bigdaddie
It's one of the LOLs in the bankruptcy era. The were referred to as PRPs (post retirement pilots). The basically came back at the bottom of the seniority list but in their seat/equip at retirement. The argument was to save training costs.
No the argument wasn't to "save training costs." It was to prevent entire categories from shutting down due to no qualified captains available and no LCAs available to train their replacements (they had all taken early retirement en masse). Necessary evil that was very limited in time and scope. See my earlier posts on this.
Reply
Old 03-18-2020 | 03:30 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,880
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
No the argument wasn't to "save training costs." It was to prevent entire categories from shutting down due to no qualified captains available and no LCAs available to train their replacements (they had all taken early retirement en masse). Necessary evil that was very limited in time and scope. See my earlier posts on this.
Some will never get it. The FAA made things even worse by limiting the number of new LCA’s they would qual each month.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CompetentFool
FedEx
607
11-14-2017 03:19 PM
dckozak
FedEx
95
09-08-2015 08:29 PM
numbersguy
Cargo
91
03-11-2009 06:04 AM
joethepilot
Regional
104
02-05-2009 01:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices