Search
Notices

MEC Response

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2020, 04:52 AM
  #41  
Rerouted On Weekends
 
Jaww's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: 717A
Posts: 2,937
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr View Post
Can you name one?
I could start with scope in the PWA but that’s not a big deal.
Jaww is offline  
Old 03-28-2020, 05:10 AM
  #42  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: The Beginnings
Posts: 1,317
Default

I remember the days when MEMRAT was the sacred right of every Delta pilot. Zealously guarded, fiercely demanded.

Ah, the golden ages of three days ago.


Like a MEC decision? “My MEC speaks for me!”

Don’t like a MEC decision? “Where’s our MEMRAT!!!!”

(I don’t envy the MEC. Lol. Wish them luck though.)
deltabound is offline  
Old 03-28-2020, 05:16 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: A330 First Officer
Posts: 1,465
Default

Originally Posted by deltabound View Post
I remember the days when MEMRAT was the sacred right of every Delta pilot. Zealously guarded, fiercely demanded.

Ah, the golden ages of three days ago.


Like a MEC decision? “My MEC speaks for me!”

Don’t like a MEC decision? “Where’s our MEMRAT!!!!”

(I don’t envy the MEC. Lol. Wish them luck though.)
Maybe you should think about what you are saying before posting. Yes we want MEMRAT if a change significantly changes our PWA. The MEC defended our current PWA and LOA so there was zero to MEMRAT. I'm open to a differing opinion but to come on here saying we should have had MEMRAT for the status quo is ridiculous.
DALMD88FO is offline  
Old 03-28-2020, 05:18 AM
  #44  
Rerouted On Weekends
 
Jaww's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: 717A
Posts: 2,937
Default

Originally Posted by DALMD88FO View Post
Maybe you should think about what you are saying before posting. Yes we want MEMRAT if a change significantly changes our PWA. The MEC defended our current PWA and LOA so there was zero to MEMRAT. I'm open to a differing opinion but to come on here saying we should have had MEMRAT for the status quo is ridiculous.
Bingo. Well said.
Jaww is offline  
Old 03-28-2020, 05:22 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 263
Default

Originally Posted by Av8rPHX View Post
It’s routed to do a DTW-SAN turn tomorrow and then RON in ORD.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
it was in Atlanta yesterday
The Localizer is offline  
Old 03-28-2020, 05:42 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tailhookah's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Widget Jet
Posts: 765
Default

Originally Posted by DALMD88FO View Post
Maybe you should think about what you are saying before posting. Yes we want MEMRAT if a change significantly changes our PWA. The MEC defended our current PWA and LOA so there was zero to MEMRAT. I'm open to a differing opinion but to come on here saying we should have had MEMRAT for the status quo is ridiculous.

Agree 100%. I engaged all 3 of my reps. Wrote a detailed email on what I expected. They all wrote back and said it was the overwhelming response from the pilot group. There was good communication and they went with the LOA that was already signed. Oh yeah... along with the billions from Uncle Sam as well.
Tailhookah is offline  
Old 03-28-2020, 05:57 AM
  #47  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: DAL Widebody
Posts: 104
Default

Originally Posted by deltabound View Post
I remember the days when MEMRAT was the sacred right of every Delta pilot. Zealously guarded, fiercely demanded.

Ah, the golden ages of three days ago.
This was your original post, not sure why you expanded it...

It’s interesting to note most pilots don’t understand MEMRAT, or even what this stands for. Indeed, in July of 2015 many MEC members either didn’t understand, or knowingly overlooked (violated) the MEC Policy Manual on membership ratification when they served up TA2015 to the pilots. It was a policy manual that, by then, had been quietly, perhaps unbeknownst to many on the MEC (or subsequent MECs), rewritten under the Moak administration in the merging of DAL/NWA MECs in 2007/2008. Certainly not all issues require MEMRAT, but the MEC must at least have the debate, and the meeting minutes and a resolution should reflect that debate.

The Moak language took away the voice of the pilots in everything except Section 6 and also departed significantly from the original DAL MEC Policy Manual which had been aligned with the ALPA (National) Constitution and ByLaws. That “rewritten” policy manual - which brought you joint venture, FAR117, TA2012...and almost TA2015 - has since been restored after local LEC resolutions beginning in SEA and ending in committee.

It’s easy to vent and opine on forums; it takes much more time to read and understand meeting minutes, policy manuals and resolutions. Inconvenient for most, but it’s is necessary in maintaining and protecting your voice.
FlighTimeBarbie is offline  
Old 03-28-2020, 06:01 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Han Solo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Fastest Hunk of Junk in the Galaxy
Posts: 1,657
Default

Originally Posted by RJ4LIFE View Post
The irony of all of this is that in an effort to downplay the importance of a union to the other work groups, the company actually managed to do the exact opposite.
But will they be smart enough to realize that, or once again fall for the company propaganda on DLnet and blame the pilot group for all their woes?
Han Solo is offline  
Old 03-28-2020, 06:06 AM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: DAL Widebody
Posts: 104
Default

Originally Posted by DALMD88FO View Post
Yes we want MEMRAT if a change significantly changes our PWA. The MEC defended our current PWA and LOA so there was zero to MEMRAT. I'm open to a differing opinion but to come on here saying we should have had MEMRAT for the status quo is ridiculous.
Agree. Also, MEMRAT is a process that takes time...
FlighTimeBarbie is offline  
Old 03-28-2020, 06:10 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,909
Default

Originally Posted by Han Solo View Post
But will they be smart enough to realize that, or once again fall for the company propaganda on DLnet and blame the pilot group for all their woes?
It'll all depend on their organized peers at UAL/AA/SWA. Pilot blame will happen, but won't change behavior IMHO.
TED74 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Redundant Guy
Regional
198
01-28-2013 07:06 AM
Redeye Pilot
United
112
11-07-2010 01:31 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
92
10-19-2010 08:02 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
6
10-17-2010 08:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices