Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
The Case For No Involuntary Furloughs >

The Case For No Involuntary Furloughs

Search

Notices

The Case For No Involuntary Furloughs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2020 | 07:17 AM
  #181  
Breadcream's Avatar
Stands to be Corrected
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: C-17 / 7ER
Default

Originally Posted by overqualified52
I wouldn’t think that 26 years of flying Props and Jets (24 as a Captain) under The Northwest/Delta organization would be considered getting “handed” a job considering I probably have 3 times as much experience and time than you do .Im sure you were handed a job . I would say a large majority of the bottom 5000 “mainline” pilots were “handed” the job with minimal experience and special interest stuff thrown in , especially the Propel Garbage . There are a handful of pilots in that bottom 5000 that payed their dues of course ..I’m sure you think you’re a “Legend in you’re own mind” as Clint Eastwood would say . Let me know if you need help knowing who Clint Eastwood is . But it’s a mute point as the entire Airline industry as we know it will be changed and a lot of people will get A kick in the crotch of Reality . Good luck to ya .
It makes me sad when trashy people don’t realize their whole life is just garbage.
Reply
Old 04-12-2020 | 07:42 AM
  #182  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,183
Likes: 638
From: ir.delta.com
Default

For me the question is at what degraded level of our PWA are we willing to work under to protect from furloughs? How many extra pilots given the level of operation is acceptable? For a 75% operation should we keep 25% of the pilots around causing a larger burden on the company? What about 50% etc.?
Reply
Old 04-12-2020 | 07:54 AM
  #183  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,236
Likes: 80
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
For me the question is at what degraded level of our PWA are we willing to work under to protect from furloughs? How many extra pilots given the level of operation is acceptable? for a 75% operation should we keep 25% of the pilots around causing a larger burden on the company?

Seriously? Other than our PWA protections we can not protect our guys from furlough. We can agree to whatever is put in front of us and management will still furlough whatever they deem necessary.

This is how it works: The company says you give us X we will reduce furloughs by Y. Well the number of proposed furloughs just went up by [Y].

[Proposed furloughs - Y] = Z Where Z equals the number the company wanted to furlough all along.

The joys of math.

OBTW - Happy Easter!

Scoop
Reply
Old 04-12-2020 | 08:12 AM
  #184  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,183
Likes: 638
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Seriously? Other than our PWA protections we can not protect our guys from furlough. We can agree to whatever is put in front of us and management will still furlough whatever they deem necessary.

This is how it works: The company says you give us X we will reduce furloughs by Y. Well the number of proposed furloughs just went up by [Y].

[Proposed furloughs - Y] = Z Where Z equals the number the company wanted to furlough all along.

The joys of math.

OBTW - Happy Easter!

Scoop
My basic question and evaluation, though not algebraic, is still valid. My opinion is no level of degradation is acceptable because the business will be adjusted to market. I think we are on the same page but in case we are not, at 50% I'd be furloughed and would expect that given the reduced level of service. Bankruptcy obviously cancels any and all agreements we make. I don't think there needs to be concessions we aren't even out of the house arrest phase yet..
Reply
Old 04-12-2020 | 08:47 AM
  #185  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 423
Likes: 3
From: 717 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Seriously? Other than our PWA protections we can not protect our guys from furlough. We can agree to whatever is put in front of us and management will still furlough whatever they deem necessary.

This is how it works: The company says you give us X we will reduce furloughs by Y. Well the number of proposed furloughs just went up by [Y].

[Proposed furloughs - Y] = Z Where Z equals the number the company wanted to furlough all along.

The joys of math.

OBTW - Happy Easter!

Scoop
Lowering the ALV would require more pilots on property.
Reply
Old 04-12-2020 | 09:43 AM
  #186  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by bender
Lowering the ALV would require more pilots on property.
‘And here is a very valid point that is being overlooked by the crowd that thinks lowering the ALV is the way we should go. Lowering the ALV has always been portrayed as a temporary fix. The company only wanted it for a couple of months.....that might have been extended to.......oh let’s say October 1.....when they can furlough/start furloughing as many pilots as they want. This has always been a short term idea. If any one seriously thinks a reduced ALV will save pilots from furlough......you need to rethink that idea.

Denny
Reply
Old 04-12-2020 | 09:50 AM
  #187  
GogglesPisano's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
20M Airline Miles
10 Years
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,495
Likes: 227
From: Sitting SC at the Five Towns
Default

Originally Posted by bender
Lowering the ALV would require more pilots on property.
If we shrink by 20% for 2 years, are you suggesting lowering the ALV for that timeframe?

I doubt the Company would agree to that since it destroys productivity.

Then again, furloughing destroys morale and the "Delta Difference" for the remainder of the careers of those pilots affected.
Reply
Old 04-12-2020 | 10:13 AM
  #188  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
How are you not at Atlas or Kalitta already?
He likely payed his application fee when he should have paid it.
Reply
Old 04-12-2020 | 10:33 AM
  #189  
D B Cooper's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Default

I think I've seen it floated around before, but what is the time frame a pilot would have to be furloughed for the company to benefit financially over the training costs?
Reply
Old 04-12-2020 | 11:19 AM
  #190  
jethikoki's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bender
I'm currently getting a cash out refinance on my house. Switching from a 15 yr to a 30 yr fixed saves $700 per month and putting a significant amount of equity into our emergency fund.
https://smartasset.com/mortgage/coro...tgage-payments
Check the above. If your income has been effected as a result of the virus you may be allowed to defer mortgage payments for 6 mo. to a year without any penalty.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
otter
Regional
33
08-14-2009 11:43 AM
jdr7225
Regional
100
04-15-2008 12:38 PM
POPA
Regional
71
08-06-2007 08:38 AM
acepilot100
Hangar Talk
0
02-09-2007 10:10 AM
Jakob
Hangar Talk
4
12-04-2006 10:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices