10 777’s staying????
#51
The increased gross weight ensures the A-350 will have no problems flying LAX - SYD*.
*Assumes current 60% load factors, VFR weather at YSCB and no significant weather deviations despite spending 4 hours crossing the ITCZ diagonally.
*Assumes current 60% load factors, VFR weather at YSCB and no significant weather deviations despite spending 4 hours crossing the ITCZ diagonally.
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 270
Paraphrased from SkyNet video.
777 is dead, done, gone, not flying at Delta. It's gone. The 777 is done at Delta, stop asking. The ERs are worthless, the LRs including the Sim have some value. In case it wasn't clear earlier, there is no scheduled 777 time in Nov, it is gone, we won't be flying the 777 anymore at Delta.
It was JL, so there is room for interpretation regarding truthfulness of the answer.
777 is dead, done, gone, not flying at Delta. It's gone. The 777 is done at Delta, stop asking. The ERs are worthless, the LRs including the Sim have some value. In case it wasn't clear earlier, there is no scheduled 777 time in Nov, it is gone, we won't be flying the 777 anymore at Delta.
It was JL, so there is room for interpretation regarding truthfulness of the answer.
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,987
Paraphrased from SkyNet video.
777 is dead, done, gone, not flying at Delta. It's gone. The 777 is done at Delta, stop asking. The ERs are worthless, the LRs including the Sim have some value. In case it wasn't clear earlier, there is no scheduled 777 time in Nov, it is gone, we won't be flying the 777 anymore at Delta.
It was JL, so there is room for interpretation regarding truthfulness of the answer.
777 is dead, done, gone, not flying at Delta. It's gone. The 777 is done at Delta, stop asking. The ERs are worthless, the LRs including the Sim have some value. In case it wasn't clear earlier, there is no scheduled 777 time in Nov, it is gone, we won't be flying the 777 anymore at Delta.
It was JL, so there is room for interpretation regarding truthfulness of the answer.
#56
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
whaaat? I’m not the world’s most observant walk around technician, but on a a couple of legs I worked this ship, I did not notice a variation on the winglets. Doesn’t mean it ain’t so. If I see structure in place, static wicks and a red or green light, it’s a thumbs up. Did not study the weight limitations placard. The GW enhancement that is present On 2513 is the rain repellent delete, which ought to allow for a minute of extra APU run or one pax to bring their therapy ferret!
I was keyed to the changeover supposedly coming on 14/15 by the several LCAs I’ve flown with, but I’m not convinced until I’m enjoying a shrimp on the barbie down under.
I was keyed to the changeover supposedly coming on 14/15 by the several LCAs I’ve flown with, but I’m not convinced until I’m enjoying a shrimp on the barbie down under.
Make sure that shrimp.on the barbie is served on Bondai...best scenery in SYD.
#58
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
They are -200 but -300 engines ,wings and gear if I remember correctly. Call it the heavy and long mod if you will. They come this way from the factory. MTOW over 750k.
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,419
if only airbus would do this with the 350; -900 length with the upgraded engines, wings and gear of the -1000 to get the -1000’s MTOW of 696k LBS
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post