Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   When Section 6 starts up again... (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/133401-when-section-6-starts-up-again.html)

TED74 03-21-2021 03:25 PM


Originally Posted by Buck Rogers (Post 3209775)


Ted...u are a smart /well informed person. The vast majority are not you.....you should undetstand that. I do.

I think the average Delta pilot is as informed as me or more and assumed it was that group (and not the general populace) to whom you were speaking. Say what you will about the hiring process - I am pretty impressed by the average hire here.

Viper25 03-21-2021 03:30 PM

So when do we start taking bets on the timeline for talks resuming and concluding?

Anybody want to share their (non sarcastic) guess?

OOfff 03-21-2021 03:33 PM


Originally Posted by Python1287 (Post 3209796)
So when do we start taking bets on the timeline for talks resuming and concluding?

Anybody want to share their (non sarcastic) guess?

we won’t see a TA before 2023

170driver 03-21-2021 03:46 PM


Originally Posted by Python1287 (Post 3209796)
So when do we start taking bets on the timeline for talks resuming and concluding?



Anybody want to share their (non sarcastic) guess?



I don’t want to see them negotiating before we turn a profit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

ppping 03-21-2021 04:17 PM


Originally Posted by 170driver (Post 3209800)
I don’t want to see them negotiating before we turn a profit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I couldn’t agree more. Every time I see “section 6” mentioned by either the union or the company I cringe.

Iceberg 03-21-2021 04:22 PM


Originally Posted by Buck Rogers (Post 3209785)
Very well thought out and about the most cogent point I've read here in a long , long time.

Your intellect is.........effing dazziling!!

What kind of response were you expecting? Someone lays out what they would like to see in a new contract and you come in with condescending BS and you thought you would get what? Did you think you would totally change everyone’s minds and make everyone want to give management some pay cuts and QOL gives like you?

boog123 03-21-2021 04:41 PM


Originally Posted by Buck Rogers (Post 3209785)
Very well thought out and about the most cogent point I've read here in a long , long time.

Your intellect is.........effing dazziling!!

Case in point.

TED74 03-21-2021 05:17 PM


Originally Posted by JamesBond (Post 3209743)
This is an interesting post. Especially the last sentence. I'd like to break it down a little further, but first I need you to define 'immediately'.

In this context, I would say immediately means they will see some benefit in that particular contract cycle. Surely we can vote for a contract that contains small things that may benefit us only in the more distant future or never at all. But I wouldn’t expect such items to make up a significant percentage of a contract’s cost. The only retirement restoration proposals I have heard about are enormously expensive and benefit only a small group of people in the first contract cycle. I think that train left the station with the VEOP.

Buck Rogers 03-21-2021 05:20 PM


Originally Posted by Iceberg (Post 3209804)
What kind of response were you expecting? Someone lays out what they would like to see in a new contract and you come in with condescending BS and you thought you would get what? Did you think you would totally change everyone’s minds and make everyone want to give management some pay cuts and QOL gives like you?

No, D**kwad. That is why I gave multiple scenarios. I challenge you, for $10,000, to find a single post where I advocated "for changing everyone’s minds and make everyone want to give management some pay cuts and QOL gives like me (you)". Look, I get that you don't like me....,.but "come on man".

One way proffer....for $10,000 find it......you have nothing to lose ....except exposing your bias.


OBTW...I laid out what I want.....purple unicorns....you got a problem with that? But, you have proven yourself to be lacking in humor....That was an option I offered.

Buck Rogers 03-21-2021 05:29 PM


Originally Posted by boog123 (Post 3209810)
Case in point.

Struck a nerve did I? Thanks for another well thought out post with logical arguments to buttress your argument. Why yes, yes indeed, you are a case in point.

I am more than happy to discuss logical, well thought out arguments. But engaging in little more than personal smear posts (as you started) benefits no one, nor does it expand anyone's perspective.

G'day to you sir, what?

Cheers


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:41 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands