![]() |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3209376)
I wasn't asking for me.
and it's not about the money. Thanks. Why are you so angry about everything? but yes, it is absolutely about the money. If it goes to you, it’s good. If it doesn’t, it’s greed (your words). |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3209379)
I’m not angry at all. I’m having a discussion. Why can’t someone have a differing opinion than you?
but yes, it is absolutely about the money. If it goes to you, it’s good. If it doesn’t, it’s greed (your words). You have nothing to worry about Chief. You have the numbers much like the democrats and can ram anything you want down anyone's throat that doesn't have a voice. Again, I wanted data points regarding the near furlough and those involved. And I thank you. |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3209383)
You do know that goes both ways, right? "money grab by the senior guys"
You have nothing to worry about Chief. You have the numbers much like the democrats and can ram anything you want down anyone's throat that doesn't have a voice. Again, I wanted data points regarding the near furlough and those involved. And I thank you. but why make this about partisan politics? |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3209386)
I’m not in the near furlough group, so you can take me out of your spreadsheet.
but why make this about partisan politics? |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3209359)
I would also run the scale out 42 years rather than the 12 we have now
I'm more concerned with getting rid of "training pay" in favor of full line pay (plus hotels and uniforms) like UAL does rather than the antiquated "pay your dues" model. We all want more money and we should negotiate as best we can. But whatever we get shouldn't be spread over nearly half a century of pay tables. Getting 42+ years on the list is legendary ninja territory. Good for them. It shouldn't take them that long to get the top pay rate. As it is now they get to spend 30 years at the top rate. That's pretty good. Closest alligator to the boat WRT LBP style concerns anyway is to blend a category or two. Of all the things in section 6 plus the new MBP I just don't see any mandate whatsoever for trying to fully and completely reinvent the wheel with this. But feel free to publish that pay rate spreadsheet so we can see how it would play out and maybe it'll change some minds. |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3209390)
An-al-o-gy. And this issue is VERY partisan in case you haven't noticed.
I’d love to have a real discussion about needs and how much our pilots actually have for retirement. What I don’t need is a concern troll acting like he’s “just asking questions,” in a transparent attempt to hide his opinion. i’d love to discuss retiree medical and other situations that make retirement a real problem for our pilots. What I don’t need is someone reflexively dismissing any differing opinions with partisan political BS and insults. so, there’s one data point for your totally neutral and not-at-all-advocating-for-one-position-over-another poll from someone in the not nearly furloughed group. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 3209392)
That would be a huge concession to the company. The scale topping out at 12 is a massive win for the pilot group as it gets more money to pilots sooner. LBP won't resemble some magical moral mandate where we just add another 30 years of annual raises on top with no downside. It would be us trying to spread the pay we could negotiate much thinner. Using a blended rate similar to the existing ER rate would put that top scale at around $600/hr. Unless all those longevity bumps were fractions of one percent, but then what's the point of that?
I'm more concerned with getting rid of "training pay" in favor of full line pay (plus hotels and uniforms) like UAL does rather than the antiquated "pay your dues" model. We all want more money and we should negotiate as best we can. But whatever we get shouldn't be spread over nearly half a century of pay tables. Getting 42+ years on the list is legendary ninja territory. Good for them. It shouldn't take them that long to get the top pay rate. As it is now they get to spend 30 years at the top rate. That's pretty good. Closest alligator to the boat WRT LBP style concerns anyway is to blend a category or two. Of all the things in section 6 plus the new MBP I just don't see any mandate whatsoever for trying to fully and completely reinvent the wheel with this. But feel free to publish that pay rate spreadsheet so we can see how it would play out and maybe it'll change some minds. |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3209398)
I would be amenable to that tack if we could get a COLA built into the contract when in negotiations.
|
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3209397)
for what it’s worth, I’d be happy to entertain restoration. What I don’t need is condescending accusations of greed and lack of compassion when you encounter anything that seems like disagreement.
I’d love to have a real discussion about needs and how much our pilots actually have for retirement. What I don’t need is a concern troll acting like he’s “just asking questions,” in a transparent attempt to hide his opinion. i’d love to discuss retiree medical and other situations that make retirement a real problem for our pilots. What I don’t need is someone reflexively dismissing any differing opinions with partisan political BS and insults. so, there’s one data point for your totally neutral and not-at-all-advocating-for-one-position-over-another poll from someone in the not nearly furloughed group. One thing you mention is a great idea. retiree medical for a few years out of Delta. DAL pays for it so it is no skin of junior's nose. Try some decaf this late in the day... and stop throwing rocks in your glass house. I have read enough of your insulting diatribes in other threads |
Scope.
Work rules. Especially reserve rules. Retro...what are the odds since COVID? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:41 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands