First Lion Air 737-900 Arriving This Week
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,417
2) the difference between the airplane x wind limit and the pilot limit on my plane is 13 kts. While that can definitely mean the difference between go/no go it is not exactly an earth shattering difference
#83
1) that’s not what you said, you said no jetliner can auto takeoff, the 350 can (at least under certain conditions)
2) the difference between the airplane x wind limit and the pilot limit on my plane is 13 kts. While that can definitely mean the difference between go/no go it is not exactly an earth shattering difference
2) the difference between the airplane x wind limit and the pilot limit on my plane is 13 kts. While that can definitely mean the difference between go/no go it is not exactly an earth shattering difference
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
#84
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
I would also note that Delta has two sets of crosswind limitations. They publish the actual limits and in the contaminated runway section publish recommended limits. The wet runway recommended limits might surprise a lot of pilots on many fleets. Delta will dispatch you routinely into and out of airports exceeding the recommended limits. Not sure what the result would be if you had a issue below the actual limit but above the recommended limit.
#85
Super Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
After flying the MD88 I could clearly understand the hate for that fleet. I can't for the life of me, understand the vitriol hate for the 73N. Flys great, easy to land, and the few extra switches you have hit is overcome by the absolutely fantastic avionics package and very capable FMS(makes alternate planning a breeze). But biggest complaint is the noise which is entirely eliminated by Hot Mics(kudos to Tech Ops for the 800 and older 900 retrofits).
But the more hate it gets the better my seniority will be so maybe I should zip it
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
But the more hate it gets the better my seniority will be so maybe I should zip it
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
The cockpit is adequately sized - If you are a Hobbit. Seriously though, as you mention the 737 is pretty good at all of the "important stuff." Its reliable, has good displays and tight NAV, nice capabilities with the HUD etc - its the little things that Boeing cheaped out that drive me crazy:
Seats recline or move aft but can not do both at the same time.
The heating and cooling system was designed by Rube Goldberg himself.
The sun-shields are a joke - I really can't believe this is their serious attempt to block the sun from Pilots.
Their is a spar below the jumpseat that will literally tear your bag to shreds if you lay it flat - you know, the way everyone would normally store your bag.
The two prongs that "catch" the Jumpseat as its lowered are conical and very sharp - much better to rip the FOs pants as gets in and out - why not make them rounded?
Speaking of getting in and out you have to be gymnast to get in and out of the seats. The 90 degree turn in the seat track that always jams is very effective in adding to this challenge.
Even Hobbits complain about the size of the Front Lav.
Cupholders that fall out and make a Chrysler Minivan look luxurious.
Oh Yeah we cant forget about the seat cushions that help put many chiropractors kids through college. Now to be fair this could be a Delta issue for not replacing the padding and cushioning as needed. Some of these things are so worn and compressed you would be better served sitting on a piece of plywood - except that now costs more than a new cushion.
Its not just the inflight noise that is a pain turning on the packs and recirc fans at the gate is a very good simulation of a hurricane. There is a reason the "Two guys in a phonebooth during a hurricane" meme sticks around.
The antique overhead doesn't even bother me becasue it works - plenty of other things in the 737 do not.
Scoop
#86
I would also note that Delta has two sets of crosswind limitations. They publish the actual limits and in the contaminated runway section publish recommended limits. The wet runway recommended limits might surprise a lot of pilots on many fleets. Delta will dispatch you routinely into and out of airports exceeding the recommended limits. Not sure what the result would be if you had a issue below the actual limit but above the recommended limit.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
#87
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Paris in the wintertime will often have strong south winds and rain for 24 hour or longer periods that exceed the wet runway recommended limits for the 330.
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 335
edited: I had the wind direction reversed in my original post.
#89
The cockpit is adequately sized - If you are a Hobbit. Seriously though, as you mention the 737 is pretty good at all of the "important stuff." Its reliable, has good displays and tight NAV, nice capabilities with the HUD etc - its the little things that Boeing cheaped out that drive me crazy:
Seats recline or move aft but can not do both at the same time.
The heating and cooling system was designed by Rube Goldberg himself.
The sun-shields are a joke - I really can't believe this is their serious attempt to block the sun from Pilots.
Their is a spar below the jumpseat that will literally tear your bag to shreds if you lay it flat - you know, the way everyone would normally store your bag.
The two prongs that "catch" the Jumpseat as its lowered are conical and very sharp - much better to rip the FOs pants as gets in and out - why not make them rounded?
Speaking of getting in and out you have to be gymnast to get in and out of the seats. The 90 degree turn in the seat track that always jams is very effective in adding to this challenge.
Even Hobbits complain about the size of the Front Lav.
Cupholders that fall out and make a Chrysler Minivan look luxurious.
Oh Yeah we cant forget about the seat cushions that help put many chiropractors kids through college. Now to be fair this could be a Delta issue for not replacing the padding and cushioning as needed. Some of these things are so worn and compressed you would be better served sitting on a piece of plywood - except that now costs more than a new cushion.
Its not just the inflight noise that is a pain turning on the packs and recirc fans at the gate is a very good simulation of a hurricane. There is a reason the "Two guys in a phonebooth during a hurricane" meme sticks around.
The antique overhead doesn't even bother me becasue it works - plenty of other things in the 737 do not.
Scoop
Seats recline or move aft but can not do both at the same time.
The heating and cooling system was designed by Rube Goldberg himself.
The sun-shields are a joke - I really can't believe this is their serious attempt to block the sun from Pilots.
Their is a spar below the jumpseat that will literally tear your bag to shreds if you lay it flat - you know, the way everyone would normally store your bag.
The two prongs that "catch" the Jumpseat as its lowered are conical and very sharp - much better to rip the FOs pants as gets in and out - why not make them rounded?
Speaking of getting in and out you have to be gymnast to get in and out of the seats. The 90 degree turn in the seat track that always jams is very effective in adding to this challenge.
Even Hobbits complain about the size of the Front Lav.
Cupholders that fall out and make a Chrysler Minivan look luxurious.
Oh Yeah we cant forget about the seat cushions that help put many chiropractors kids through college. Now to be fair this could be a Delta issue for not replacing the padding and cushioning as needed. Some of these things are so worn and compressed you would be better served sitting on a piece of plywood - except that now costs more than a new cushion.
Its not just the inflight noise that is a pain turning on the packs and recirc fans at the gate is a very good simulation of a hurricane. There is a reason the "Two guys in a phonebooth during a hurricane" meme sticks around.
The antique overhead doesn't even bother me becasue it works - plenty of other things in the 737 do not.
Scoop
https://www.oregonaero.com/accessori...table-cushions
#90
[QUOTE=Gone Flying;3268654]1) that’s not what you said, you said no jetliner can auto takeoff, the 350 can (at least under certain conditions)
Whaaaaaat? Fact check, please. What are those certain conditions? Is Tesla reworking the cockpit for us?
If the jet has an automatic takeoff capability, I should report to my nearest FSDO and turn in my A350 Type Rating. IQ, several CQ and currency sims and 1000+ hours in the ship, and I have never heard of this. I too saw that Airbus demonstrated automatic takeoff, but I think certified capability is in the future.
I honestly have not been following this subset of the thread (that I actually started by talking about 737 deliveries - nice thread drift btw). But this "factoid" caught my eye and I had to respond. Let me describe the A350 "auto-takeoff feature" and the human steps required to trigger it:
1) Like any other airplane, line her up and turn the lights on, etc.
2) Apply forward stick pressure and stand-up the throttles, I mean thrust levers, for initial matched spool-up at 25% N1, then take levers to the appropriate detent (FLEX or TOGA) ... no pesky buttons or lever actions required to make the auto thrust system do its thing.
3) Hang on and wait for 80 KIAS, just like all our other airplanes.
4) "V1, Vr" aft stick to achieve 12.5 degrees or follow FD if it's already up to the task.
5) "Positive rate - gear up" then NO SOONER than 5 seconds after takeoff, the autopilot can be engaged. If appropriate restrictions are in the FMS, it could be quite some time before pilot action is required to stay on the proper trajectory
6). The rest of the initial climb profile is just like any other Delta jet: human action required to reduce thrust, verify or alter vertical and horizontal nav modes and retract high lift devices.
So, that's the highest level of takeoff automation available on an A350 as far as I know. Pretty darn automatic compared to a 737, but a far cry from taking the pilot out of the loop.
Cool automatic stuff the A350 will do if you're a slacker pilot or simply unconscious: turn off course and descend to a safe altitude for a cabin decompression, perform a CFIT escape maneuver, respond to a TCAS RA (actually, we train to just let the ship do it) and turn on the radar display if hazardous wx is detected.
Cool stuff, but at the end of the day does it enrichen your life as a pilot? I don't really think so, but it sure is comfortable and quiet.
Whaaaaaat? Fact check, please. What are those certain conditions? Is Tesla reworking the cockpit for us?
If the jet has an automatic takeoff capability, I should report to my nearest FSDO and turn in my A350 Type Rating. IQ, several CQ and currency sims and 1000+ hours in the ship, and I have never heard of this. I too saw that Airbus demonstrated automatic takeoff, but I think certified capability is in the future.
I honestly have not been following this subset of the thread (that I actually started by talking about 737 deliveries - nice thread drift btw). But this "factoid" caught my eye and I had to respond. Let me describe the A350 "auto-takeoff feature" and the human steps required to trigger it:
1) Like any other airplane, line her up and turn the lights on, etc.
2) Apply forward stick pressure and stand-up the throttles, I mean thrust levers, for initial matched spool-up at 25% N1, then take levers to the appropriate detent (FLEX or TOGA) ... no pesky buttons or lever actions required to make the auto thrust system do its thing.
3) Hang on and wait for 80 KIAS, just like all our other airplanes.
4) "V1, Vr" aft stick to achieve 12.5 degrees or follow FD if it's already up to the task.
5) "Positive rate - gear up" then NO SOONER than 5 seconds after takeoff, the autopilot can be engaged. If appropriate restrictions are in the FMS, it could be quite some time before pilot action is required to stay on the proper trajectory
6). The rest of the initial climb profile is just like any other Delta jet: human action required to reduce thrust, verify or alter vertical and horizontal nav modes and retract high lift devices.
So, that's the highest level of takeoff automation available on an A350 as far as I know. Pretty darn automatic compared to a 737, but a far cry from taking the pilot out of the loop.
Cool automatic stuff the A350 will do if you're a slacker pilot or simply unconscious: turn off course and descend to a safe altitude for a cabin decompression, perform a CFIT escape maneuver, respond to a TCAS RA (actually, we train to just let the ship do it) and turn on the radar display if hazardous wx is detected.
Cool stuff, but at the end of the day does it enrichen your life as a pilot? I don't really think so, but it sure is comfortable and quiet.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post