Search

Notices

Alaska Strike Vote

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2022 | 08:34 PM
  #41  
DALFA's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
From: I'm here, i'm there, i'm everywhere...
Default

Originally Posted by BCan
agreed and familiar.

You could also be fired.

Your chances of going to jail - zero.

If we want to speak in reality, by the time an injunction was issued…the damage would already be done with no winners.
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/11/n...er-strike.html

It's happened before. The only reason the chances of Delta pilots going to jail is zero is because the chances of the NMB releasing Delta pilots from negotiations is also zero.

Btw: A company could receive an emergency injunction in a matter of hours.

"If labor does not respond promptly to an injunction, the carrier's only legal recourse is to seek contempt penalties from the court...Contempt penalties may be in the form of compensatory fines for the plaintiff carrier, criminal fines, or incarceration to vindicate the authority of the court." - Hastings Law Journal

Last edited by DALFA; 05-25-2022 at 08:46 PM. Reason: Added reference
Reply
Old 05-25-2022 | 08:35 PM
  #42  
DALFA's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
From: I'm here, i'm there, i'm everywhere...
Default

Originally Posted by BCan
I’m not familiar with the case where 14000 pilots are arrested for violating a federal injunction…I’ll dig deeper.

I’m now scared straight…I just ordered a backup hat to make sure I don’t run afoul of Delta and go to jail.
I'm not familiar with a case where 14000 pilots violated a federal injunction so it's kind of difficult to find a case where 14000 pilots were arrested if 14000 pilots have never violated a federal injunction.
Reply
Old 05-25-2022 | 10:48 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by DALFA
The amount of EAS flying has absolutely nothing to do with it. I don't think you understand the NMB process.
I fully understand it. I am explaining why all this talk about never being released even if Alaska is makes no sense. We may be big, but we don't shut the country down if we stop flying. Alaska is one of the only ways into and out of some places q
and a significant source of supplies to areas that you can't drive to. There is much more reason to stop a strike by them than us.
Reply
Old 05-25-2022 | 11:46 PM
  #44  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Default

Some of You guys are missing the bigger picture. This will make it MUCH harder for AS to get NHs onboard, not to mention ALPA reps will probably help, especially FOs get their apps out elsewhere combined w preferential interviews at legacies.

Plentyyyy of leverage without actually needing to strike. Doubly so in this unprecedented hiring environment.
Reply
Old 05-26-2022 | 04:15 AM
  #45  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 415
Default

What he said above. It's not necessarily about going on strike as it is messaging to the public. If the public thinks there is a chance of a strike (they don't understand RLA), they'll think twice about booking on Alaska...that alone generates leverage.
Reply
Old 05-26-2022 | 04:50 AM
  #46  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 813
Likes: 27
From: Wind checker
Default

Originally Posted by Earthboundmsfit
Some of You guys are missing the bigger picture. This will make it MUCH harder for AS to get NHs onboard, not to mention ALPA reps will probably help, especially FOs get their apps out elsewhere combined w preferential interviews at legacies.

Plentyyyy of leverage without actually needing to strike. Doubly so in this unprecedented hiring environment.
I think the Atlas union was helping guys with apps to other carriers during the lengthy negotiations there. At this point in time, pilots are critical resources for the growth and sustainment plans for any airline. Alaska is in big trouble if they can’t retain their people.
Reply
Old 05-26-2022 | 05:46 AM
  #47  
Starcheck102's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: ATL 330 A
Default

How far apart are labor and management at Alaska?

Post consolidation, this tactic has only been effective in a limited number of circumstances. It has to be the end game in mediation, usually after several years of working with the NMB. For this to work, the mediator must feel confident that the pilot union is more committed to reaching an agreement than their counterparts on the management side. Someone correct me if I’m wrong, it’s my understanding that the two parties have only been in mediation since January, which looks like a fairly heavy rhetorical lift.

The Alaska pilots are lagging the industry in compensation, and earn about $19 less per hour than pilots at Delta.





​​​​​​​
Attached Images
Reply
Old 05-26-2022 | 05:56 AM
  #48  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 211
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
Tonight as pax were deplaning one of them asked us if Alaska was going on strike, so the general public at least has some sense that Alaska could be a risky bet.
For this reason alone, there needs to be a "statement" from ALPA/DALPA that we can refer the customers to. I can't imagine 14k different responses would do anything to further our case.
Reply
Old 05-26-2022 | 06:26 AM
  #49  
DALFA's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
From: I'm here, i'm there, i'm everywhere...
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium
I fully understand it. I am explaining why all this talk about never being released even if Alaska is makes no sense. We may be big, but we don't shut the country down if we stop flying. Alaska is one of the only ways into and out of some places q
and a significant source of supplies to areas that you can't drive to. There is much more reason to stop a strike by them than us.
We operate roughly 20% of domestic flights. If we stop flying it would cripple interstate commerce which is why the RLA was created in the first place. A few small communities losing air service due to a strike doesn't cripple interstate commerce. Sure, it negatively impacts those small communities but the RLA and NMB don't look at that. They look at the overall picture. If what you are saying was true then no regional airline would ever be allowed to go on strike and obviously we all know that's not the case.
Reply
Old 05-26-2022 | 06:47 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DALFA
We operate roughly 20% of domestic flights. If we stop flying it would cripple interstate commerce which is why the RLA was created in the first place. A few small communities losing air service due to a strike doesn't cripple interstate commerce. Sure, it negatively impacts those small communities but the RLA and NMB don't look at that. They look at the overall picture. If what you are saying was true then no regional airline would ever be allowed to go on strike and obviously we all know that's not the case.
I think you are missing the point. There are people who very well could starve if Alaska stopped flying there. I am pretty sure the RLA would be concerned about that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
Kilgore Trout
Part 135
46
06-19-2009 03:35 AM
HSLD
Major
10
04-16-2007 12:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices