Contract Expectations
#451
Let’s be realistic here, do you know anyone in any job getting raises ABOVE inflation? I don’t. Let’s not forget that our own government owns of all the inflation issues. It isn’t Delta’s fault. I’m not tempering expectations, I expect a homerun with all the billions Delta has for JV’s and the constant deterioration in QOL but I don’t expect Delta to fix our fiat monetary system issues when they had nothing to do with it. Call your local Congress people if you want the issue fixed. Don’t send Delta a bill. No way we are fixing all our QOL issues and then getting raises above inflation.
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/john-deere-inflation-bellwether-united-auto-workers-union-wages-11637276050
#452
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
From: I'm here, i'm there, i'm everywhere...
Let’s be realistic here, do you know anyone in any job getting raises ABOVE inflation? I don’t. Let’s not forget that our own government owns of all the inflation issues. It isn’t Delta’s fault. I’m not tempering expectations, I expect a homerun with all the billions Delta has for JV’s and the constant deterioration in QOL but I don’t expect Delta to fix our fiat monetary system issues when they had nothing to do with it. Call your local Congress people if you want the issue fixed. Don’t send Delta a bill. No way we are fixing all our QOL issues and then getting raises above inflation.
Raised its starting wage from $15 in 2017 to $22 in 2022. That's a 46.7% raise in their minimum hourly wage in the past 5 years. How much was inflation during that time?
https://newsroom.bankofamerica.com/c...%20%2445%2C000.
#453
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
It seems like everyone expects a 3-year deal with 3 years of raises going forward and all retroactive to 2020.
If we are negotiating two contracts as has been stated, then why not negotiate a 6-year deal?
I'm sure the company can figure out retroactive raises year-by-year. So, why not inflationary-ish numbers from 2020, 21 and 22, THEN start with the new numbers.
1.4 for 2020, 7 for 2021 then 9 for 2022 and get 1 check encompassing all prior years.
The 20% day 1 crowd that implies it should be 20% from 2020 is out of touch with reality.
If we are negotiating two contracts as has been stated, then why not negotiate a 6-year deal?
I'm sure the company can figure out retroactive raises year-by-year. So, why not inflationary-ish numbers from 2020, 21 and 22, THEN start with the new numbers.
1.4 for 2020, 7 for 2021 then 9 for 2022 and get 1 check encompassing all prior years.
The 20% day 1 crowd that implies it should be 20% from 2020 is out of touch with reality.
#454
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: :)
It seems like everyone expects a 3-year deal with 3 years of raises going forward and all retroactive to 2020.
If we are negotiating two contracts as has been stated, then why not negotiate a 6-year deal?
I'm sure the company can figure out retroactive raises year-by-year. So, why not inflationary-ish numbers from 2020, 21 and 22, THEN start with the new numbers.
1.4 for 2020, 7 for 2021 then 9 for 2022 and get 1 check encompassing all prior years.
The 20% day 1 crowd that implies it should be 20% from 2020 is out of touch with reality.
If we are negotiating two contracts as has been stated, then why not negotiate a 6-year deal?
I'm sure the company can figure out retroactive raises year-by-year. So, why not inflationary-ish numbers from 2020, 21 and 22, THEN start with the new numbers.
1.4 for 2020, 7 for 2021 then 9 for 2022 and get 1 check encompassing all prior years.
The 20% day 1 crowd that implies it should be 20% from 2020 is out of touch with reality.
Name one thing that's only up 16% since 2020? Most things are 2x that.
#455
Roll’n Thunder
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,185
Likes: 609
From: Pilot
It seems like everyone expects a 3-year deal with 3 years of raises going forward and all retroactive to 2020.
If we are negotiating two contracts as has been stated, then why not negotiate a 6-year deal?
I'm sure the company can figure out retroactive raises year-by-year. So, why not inflationary-ish numbers from 2020, 21 and 22, THEN start with the new numbers.
1.4 for 2020, 7 for 2021 then 9 for 2022 and get 1 check encompassing all prior years.
The 20% day 1 crowd that implies it should be 20% from 2020 is out of touch with reality.
If we are negotiating two contracts as has been stated, then why not negotiate a 6-year deal?
I'm sure the company can figure out retroactive raises year-by-year. So, why not inflationary-ish numbers from 2020, 21 and 22, THEN start with the new numbers.
1.4 for 2020, 7 for 2021 then 9 for 2022 and get 1 check encompassing all prior years.
The 20% day 1 crowd that implies it should be 20% from 2020 is out of touch with reality.
Now once our new pay scales are decided, then you have to bring in retro pay. So say if we do get 20% DOS, I haven't heard a single person say we should be due a retro check worth 20% of all our earnings from 2020-2022. Everyone seems to be agreed that we should factor in our theoretical pay raises during those years to figure out the retro due. So say 4% of your 2020 earnings + 9% of your 2021 earnings +16% of your 2022 earnings (or whatever magical percentages we come up with).
#456
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
#459
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,582
Likes: 77
There's 2 different things going on here - you have to separate discussion about rates vs retro pay (to an extent). All of the "20% day 1" people are saying that's what the new rates need to be based off our expired 2019 rates. That's basically what you called for in the first part I bolded. We're going to need ~20% raises on day 1 in order to keep up with 3 years of inflation. In effect, this is negotiating C2019 as a 3 year payrate-only deal. Then, from date-of-signing forward (on top of the 20% right off the bat) we need further rate increases 2023-however long the deal is. So in effect, looking only at payrates, our next TA would be a 6 year deal (or 5 or 7 depending on the actual length) in that we won't miss a single year of pay rate increases.
Now once our new pay scales are decided, then you have to bring in retro pay. So say if we do get 20% DOS, I haven't heard a single person say we should be due a retro check worth 20% of all our earnings from 2020-2022. Everyone seems to be agreed that we should factor in our theoretical pay raises during those years to figure out the retro due. So say 4% of your 2020 earnings + 9% of your 2021 earnings +16% of your 2022 earnings (or whatever magical percentages we come up with).
Now once our new pay scales are decided, then you have to bring in retro pay. So say if we do get 20% DOS, I haven't heard a single person say we should be due a retro check worth 20% of all our earnings from 2020-2022. Everyone seems to be agreed that we should factor in our theoretical pay raises during those years to figure out the retro due. So say 4% of your 2020 earnings + 9% of your 2021 earnings +16% of your 2022 earnings (or whatever magical percentages we come up with).
#460
Hate to say prediction.
One time payment for voting members on signing date. Nope, not retro, nope, not a signing bonus. A “contract RE-up” payment.
Veops, still goodbye.
Retirees, stop calling.
Current pilots, well- hey I’d had the same in retro!
Mgmt, brilliant. Bonuses all around. We save billions.
Me- if we go to age 67 I’m starting a 30 year countdown AGAIN; for a 3rd time. Nope nope nope.
One time payment for voting members on signing date. Nope, not retro, nope, not a signing bonus. A “contract RE-up” payment.
Veops, still goodbye.
Retirees, stop calling.
Current pilots, well- hey I’d had the same in retro!
Mgmt, brilliant. Bonuses all around. We save billions.
Me- if we go to age 67 I’m starting a 30 year countdown AGAIN; for a 3rd time. Nope nope nope.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



