Search

Notices

Contract Expectations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2022 | 08:39 PM
  #451  
O R C A's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 32
Likes: 10
From: 220
Default

Originally Posted by Nantonaku
Let’s be realistic here, do you know anyone in any job getting raises ABOVE inflation? I don’t. Let’s not forget that our own government owns of all the inflation issues. It isn’t Delta’s fault. I’m not tempering expectations, I expect a homerun with all the billions Delta has for JV’s and the constant deterioration in QOL but I don’t expect Delta to fix our fiat monetary system issues when they had nothing to do with it. Call your local Congress people if you want the issue fixed. Don’t send Delta a bill. No way we are fixing all our QOL issues and then getting raises above inflation.
Yes, John Deere workers voted down an agreement secured a larger raise and cost of living adjustments. If the link doesn’t work Google it.

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/john-deere-inflation-bellwether-united-auto-workers-union-wages-11637276050
Reply
Old 08-01-2022 | 09:46 PM
  #452  
DALFA's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
From: I'm here, i'm there, i'm everywhere...
Default

Originally Posted by Nantonaku
Let’s be realistic here, do you know anyone in any job getting raises ABOVE inflation? I don’t. Let’s not forget that our own government owns of all the inflation issues. It isn’t Delta’s fault. I’m not tempering expectations, I expect a homerun with all the billions Delta has for JV’s and the constant deterioration in QOL but I don’t expect Delta to fix our fiat monetary system issues when they had nothing to do with it. Call your local Congress people if you want the issue fixed. Don’t send Delta a bill. No way we are fixing all our QOL issues and then getting raises above inflation.
Bank of America...

Raised its starting wage from $15 in 2017 to $22 in 2022. That's a 46.7% raise in their minimum hourly wage in the past 5 years. How much was inflation during that time?

https://newsroom.bankofamerica.com/c...%20%2445%2C000.
Reply
Old 08-02-2022 | 10:56 AM
  #453  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Default

It seems like everyone expects a 3-year deal with 3 years of raises going forward and all retroactive to 2020.

If we are negotiating two contracts as has been stated, then why not negotiate a 6-year deal?

I'm sure the company can figure out retroactive raises year-by-year. So, why not inflationary-ish numbers from 2020, 21 and 22, THEN start with the new numbers.

1.4 for 2020, 7 for 2021 then 9 for 2022 and get 1 check encompassing all prior years.

The 20% day 1 crowd that implies it should be 20% from 2020 is out of touch with reality.
Reply
Old 08-02-2022 | 11:12 AM
  #454  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: :)
Default

Originally Posted by PapaMike
It seems like everyone expects a 3-year deal with 3 years of raises going forward and all retroactive to 2020.

If we are negotiating two contracts as has been stated, then why not negotiate a 6-year deal?

I'm sure the company can figure out retroactive raises year-by-year. So, why not inflationary-ish numbers from 2020, 21 and 22, THEN start with the new numbers.

1.4 for 2020, 7 for 2021 then 9 for 2022 and get 1 check encompassing all prior years.

The 20% day 1 crowd that implies it should be 20% from 2020 is out of touch with reality.
Out of touch with reality is thinking inflation between 2021 2022 was only 16%

Name one thing that's only up 16% since 2020? Most things are 2x that.
Reply
Old 08-02-2022 | 11:41 AM
  #455  
Roll’n Thunder
Community Influencer
15 Years
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,185
Likes: 609
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by PapaMike
It seems like everyone expects a 3-year deal with 3 years of raises going forward and all retroactive to 2020.

If we are negotiating two contracts as has been stated, then why not negotiate a 6-year deal?

I'm sure the company can figure out retroactive raises year-by-year. So, why not inflationary-ish numbers from 2020, 21 and 22, THEN start with the new numbers.

1.4 for 2020, 7 for 2021 then 9 for 2022 and get 1 check encompassing all prior years.

The 20% day 1 crowd that implies it should be 20% from 2020 is out of touch with reality.
There's 2 different things going on here - you have to separate discussion about rates vs retro pay (to an extent). All of the "20% day 1" people are saying that's what the new rates need to be based off our expired 2019 rates. That's basically what you called for in the first part I bolded. We're going to need ~20% raises on day 1 in order to keep up with 3 years of inflation. In effect, this is negotiating C2019 as a 3 year payrate-only deal. Then, from date-of-signing forward (on top of the 20% right off the bat) we need further rate increases 2023-however long the deal is. So in effect, looking only at payrates, our next TA would be a 6 year deal (or 5 or 7 depending on the actual length) in that we won't miss a single year of pay rate increases.

Now once our new pay scales are decided, then you have to bring in retro pay. So say if we do get 20% DOS, I haven't heard a single person say we should be due a retro check worth 20% of all our earnings from 2020-2022. Everyone seems to be agreed that we should factor in our theoretical pay raises during those years to figure out the retro due. So say 4% of your 2020 earnings + 9% of your 2021 earnings +16% of your 2022 earnings (or whatever magical percentages we come up with).
Reply
Old 08-02-2022 | 11:41 AM
  #456  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JustNarced
Out of touch with reality is thinking inflation between 2021 2022 was only 16%

Name one thing that's only up 16% since 2020? Most things are 2x that.
Cool story.

But you missed the point.
Reply
Old 08-02-2022 | 12:03 PM
  #457  
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,971
Likes: 239
From: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Default

Originally Posted by PapaMike
Cool story.

But you missed the point.
So, this, basically?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
missing the point.jpg (3.1 KB, 475 views)
Reply
Old 08-02-2022 | 12:47 PM
  #458  
JamesBond's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Default

Originally Posted by snowdawg
There is a pilot shortage for reason. It doesn't pay enough!
Are you serious?
Reply
Old 08-02-2022 | 02:04 PM
  #459  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,582
Likes: 77
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
There's 2 different things going on here - you have to separate discussion about rates vs retro pay (to an extent). All of the "20% day 1" people are saying that's what the new rates need to be based off our expired 2019 rates. That's basically what you called for in the first part I bolded. We're going to need ~20% raises on day 1 in order to keep up with 3 years of inflation. In effect, this is negotiating C2019 as a 3 year payrate-only deal. Then, from date-of-signing forward (on top of the 20% right off the bat) we need further rate increases 2023-however long the deal is. So in effect, looking only at payrates, our next TA would be a 6 year deal (or 5 or 7 depending on the actual length) in that we won't miss a single year of pay rate increases.

Now once our new pay scales are decided, then you have to bring in retro pay. So say if we do get 20% DOS, I haven't heard a single person say we should be due a retro check worth 20% of all our earnings from 2020-2022. Everyone seems to be agreed that we should factor in our theoretical pay raises during those years to figure out the retro due. So say 4% of your 2020 earnings + 9% of your 2021 earnings +16% of your 2022 earnings (or whatever magical percentages we come up with).
That is why I don't understand the big workup over retro pay for retirees. People worked 6 months under an expired contract and can't wait for their retro. We are all gonna get chump change. So if you worked 1 year then you'll end up with (chump change)/4 = not much.
Reply
Old 08-02-2022 | 06:48 PM
  #460  
higney85's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 10
From: Bus driver
Default

Hate to say prediction.

One time payment for voting members on signing date. Nope, not retro, nope, not a signing bonus. A “contract RE-up” payment.

Veops, still goodbye.
Retirees, stop calling.
Current pilots, well- hey I’d had the same in retro!
Mgmt, brilliant. Bonuses all around. We save billions.


Me- if we go to age 67 I’m starting a 30 year countdown AGAIN; for a 3rd time. Nope nope nope.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
Rogue24
Major
104
06-15-2012 04:49 AM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM
old gasser
Union Talk
28
06-08-2008 12:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices