![]() |
Originally Posted by Shakinthefat
(Post 3527663)
So LCC carriers are basically SWA and JB. Do the ULCC carriers offer a better quality of life and make darn near the pay of legacy carriers?
Our pilots are too busy gobbling up green slips and chasing the short-term money to realize there is a whole gob or long-term money out there for the taking. Other airlines / sectors of the industry have found it haphazardly by running short of pilots to fly the airplanes, necessitating contract/pay improvements. We are still woefully short staffed at Delta. Just wouldn’t know it with the number of green slips that get picked up. We aren’t exerting and *real leverage. |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 3527655)
United is actually being forward-thinking by looking at adding crew bases in popular places to live. EWR, DEN, and SFO just don’t cut it for most people with the cost of living being what it is and inflation/mortgage interest rates ravaging middle class income and wealth.
With flights more full than ever, interest rates steadily rising, single-family home affordability nearly out of reach for most, and bases in high cost of living cities pilots simply can’t/won’t move to base. And an awful commute will only be put up with for so long. Pilots will leave. Legacy airlines are good jobs, but they aren’t even close to what they used to be. There is better quality of life to be had at the LCCs and you’ll make darn near comparable pay. The legacy airline job has been steadily eroded and at the same time the LCC and major jobs have gotten way better. Hell regional Captains are making more than legacy Captains at this point. Cost of living is through the roof and home affordability is at an all-time low. There isn’t a single base at Delta that is even remotely appealing to most new hires unless they already live there or have family that does. Like it or not Delta is going to have to change with the changing times or be left in the dust. It’s a different world and a different airline than the one many of you came up in. I retired from the reserves last December, and we have nothing really holding us to Norfolk/Va Beach anymore. Neither of us are super close to family in a "I must live within X hours of Mom/Dad/Siblings". FWIW, my mom is in FL, her dad is in NY. My brother is in MI, hers in DFW. My "requirement" to move is "I want to be able to sit short call on my couch" NYC: Too darn expensive to live anywhere acceptable within "short call on my couch" range. Like I can't afford a decent single family home as a NB Captain. MEDIAN home sale on Long Island.. $620k, and that's with a lot of "I'm not living there" north of 1/2M. Oh, and you will have around $12,000 a year property tax on said $620k house. It's a no go based on we can't have a decent house in the suburbs without being housepoor, especially once income tax and property tax are factored in. ATL: It's not cheap anymore. I was too old when hired, so I'll always be junior there. She kind of likes the metro, but HATES PTC with a passion (she has visited there with Navy friends). MSP: Senior as hell, nuclear winters. Seems somewhat affordable. DTW: I would move back (I went to college in MI) and live on a lake or next to a state forest or near the ORV trail system and hour or two west of Ann Arbor. Wife is scared of the crime. (despite me and others telling her 8 mile and RoboCop are not technically documentaries) She also freaks out over Roger and Me (I went to college with the rabbit lady's daughter if you've seen the film). It is probably the most affordable of all our hubs. Her non joking dislike of it is the schools are kind of crap in the places she's been looking. The places with decent schools that she finds culturally compatible (West Bloomfileld, wife is Jewish) are kind of meh for me. It's honestly the hub we are most likely to move to once I get a bit more senior, but she wants a place on the Gulf Coast to avoid winter. SLC: We lived in this neck of the woods. She doesn't want to subject kids to being the only Jewish kids in a LDS area. Been there, seen that with other friends. SEA: Like the place better than NY, but the housing market is rough. LAX: We love the area (aside from taxes/some laws) because we are both big time motocross/dirtbike people (we fly to CA 3-4X a year to go to certain races, our vacation is usually centered around doing some sort of motocross or dirtbike thing) But the housing market is untenable. We were just there last month, and we couldn't find anything we could afford that hit our min requirements. (3/2, 2 car garage, non postage stamp yard, sit short call on couch, not in the hood) BOS: We have thought of it but after CVG closing, we aren't exactly ready to move to a 1 category base, because then we will have moved and I'm now just in the "normally commute by air, but can drive if loads suck" just from the other direction to NYC. Would likely live in NH, SE VT or SW Maine. |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 3527655)
United is actually being forward-thinking by looking at adding crew bases in popular places to live. EWR, DEN, and SFO just don’t cut it for most people with the cost of living being what it is and inflation/mortgage interest rates ravaging middle class income and wealth.
With flights more full than ever, interest rates steadily rising, single-family home affordability nearly out of reach for most, and bases in high cost of living cities pilots simply can’t/won’t move to base. And an awful commute will only be put up with for so long. Pilots will leave. Legacy airlines are good jobs, but they aren’t even close to what they used to be. There is better quality of life to be had at the LCCs and you’ll make darn near comparable pay. The legacy airline job has been steadily eroded and at the same time the LCC and major jobs have gotten way better. Hell regional Captains are making more than legacy Captains at this point. Cost of living is through the roof and home affordability is at an all-time low. There isn’t a single base at Delta that is even remotely appealing to most new hires unless they already live there or have family that does. Like it or not Delta is going to have to change with the changing times or be left in the dust. It’s a different world and a different airline than the one many of you came up in. What bases do you think are appealing? No offense to TX and FL, but not everyone wants to live there. I get your point by the way, but sheesh. |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 3527655)
United is actually being forward-thinking by looking at adding crew bases in popular places to live. EWR, DEN, and SFO just don’t cut it for most people with the cost of living being what it is and inflation/mortgage interest rates ravaging middle class income and wealth.
With flights more full than ever, interest rates steadily rising, single-family home affordability nearly out of reach for most, and bases in high cost of living cities pilots simply can’t/won’t move to base. And an awful commute will only be put up with for so long. Pilots will leave. Legacy airlines are good jobs, but they aren’t even close to what they used to be. There is better quality of life to be had at the LCCs and you’ll make darn near comparable pay. The legacy airline job has been steadily eroded and at the same time the LCC and major jobs have gotten way better. Hell regional Captains are making more than legacy Captains at this point. Cost of living is through the roof and home affordability is at an all-time low. There isn’t a single base at Delta that is even remotely appealing to most new hires unless they already live there or have family that does. Like it or not Delta is going to have to change with the changing times or be left in the dust. It’s a different world and a different airline than the one many of you came up in. You're in "old man yells at cloud" level here. Stick to the complaints such as pilots living in x region would rather base with UA, AA, SWA etc instead of trying to speak for everyone else. |
Originally Posted by CX500T
(Post 3527676)
This.. As a hired in late 30s (and mid 40s now) guy here is my families take. Wife is from upstate NY, I'm from rural Massachusetts.
I retired from the reserves last December, and we have nothing really holding us to Norfolk/Va Beach anymore. Neither of us are super close to family in a "I must live within X hours of Mom/Dad/Siblings". FWIW, my mom is in FL, her dad is in NY. My brother is in MI, hers in DFW. My "requirement" to move is "I want to be able to sit short call on my couch" NYC: Too darn expensive to live anywhere acceptable within "short call on my couch" range. Like I can't afford a decent single family home as a NB Captain. MEDIAN home sale on Long Island.. $620k, and that's with a lot of "I'm not living there" north of 1/2M. Oh, and you will have around $12,000 a year property tax on said $620k house. It's a no go based on we can't have a decent house in the suburbs without being housepoor, especially once income tax and property tax are factored in. ATL: It's not cheap anymore. I was too old when hired, so I'll always be junior there. She kind of likes the metro, but HATES PTC with a passion (she has visited there with Navy friends). MSP: Senior as hell, nuclear winters. Seems somewhat affordable. DTW: I would move back (I went to college in MI) and live on a lake or next to a state forest or near the ORV trail system and hour or two west of Ann Arbor. Wife is scared of the crime. (despite me and others telling her 8 mile and RoboCop are not technically documentaries) She also freaks out over Roger and Me (I went to college with the rabbit lady's daughter if you've seen the film). It is probably the most affordable of all our hubs. Her non joking dislike of it is the schools are kind of crap in the places she's been looking. The places with decent schools that she finds culturally compatible (West Bloomfileld, wife is Jewish) are kind of meh for me. It's honestly the hub we are most likely to move to once I get a bit more senior, but she wants a place on the Gulf Coast to avoid winter. SLC: We lived in this neck of the woods. She doesn't want to subject kids to being the only Jewish kids in a LDS area. Been there, seen that with other friends. SEA: Like the place better than NY, but the housing market is rough. LAX: We love the area (aside from taxes/some laws) because we are both big time motocross/dirtbike people (we fly to CA 3-4X a year to go to certain races, our vacation is usually centered around doing some sort of motocross or dirtbike thing) But the housing market is untenable. We were just there last month, and we couldn't find anything we could afford that hit our min requirements. (3/2, 2 car garage, non postage stamp yard, sit short call on couch, not in the hood) BOS: We have thought of it but after CVG closing, we aren't exactly ready to move to a 1 category base, because then we will have moved and I'm now just in the "normally commute by air, but can drive if loads suck" just from the other direction to NYC. Would likely live in NH, SE VT or SW Maine. |
Originally Posted by BlueSkies
(Post 3527678)
Whoa, speak for yourself there! That is quite a sweeping statement. Delta has what, seven bases? If you don't already live somewhere else or have family somewhere else and can't manage to stomach even one of Delta's bases then maybe that's on you.
What bases do you think are appealing? No offense to TX and FL, but not everyone wants to live there. I get your point by the way, but sheesh. I can get no FL because it's really close to ATL, but we don't have much of anything in the great plains/east side of the rockies. DEN is what? UA, SWA, F9 IAH UA HOU SWA DFW AA, Spirit DAL SWA FL has everyone but UA and DL There are a lot of "Tax advantaged" places we could put a hub in. Heck we have FA bases. But we'd have to have network stop ssharpshooting on a weekly basis the best fleet to put in base X As a 320 guy, I think we might be the "lets go try a base" fleet, as the 321NEO takes over the lower end of the ER flying, and the 319 is pretty small. But even then who knows. FAs just need X departures a day to make a base work. We need Y departures on one fleet consistently year round to make a pilot base work. |
Originally Posted by CX500T
(Post 3527687)
But here is my question: Why are we the ONLY major/LCC without a TX or FL base?
|
Originally Posted by FL370
(Post 3527695)
Having lived in both states, no thanks. But have at it. I prefer bases where our air line makes the most money.
|
Devil’s advocate here. If ACMI can make home basing work, why cant we? Not for 1 day trips perhaps but stilm.
|
Originally Posted by FL370
(Post 3527695)
Having lived in both states, no thanks. But have at it. I prefer bases where our air line makes the most money.
DFW is currently on pace to surpass Chicago to become the 3rd largest metro area in the U.S., putting it behind only NYC and Los Angeles. AUS saw 33% growth in the past decade. The idea that Delta can’t make money in TX or FL is insane. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:39 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands