Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   MEC chairman election (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/140294-mec-chairman-election.html)

BigHitterLlama 11-16-2022 11:25 AM


Originally Posted by Scooter432 (Post 3532820)
Hartmann won 9-8

WTF. Emailed the NYC FO rep a week ago saying vote for anybody but Hartmann. Got no reply. Now I know why.

Herkflyr 11-16-2022 11:26 AM


Originally Posted by JustNarced (Post 3532850)
So then you are happy with the direction the airline has been heading over the past 4 years? What exactly is "fair?" Who decides fair? Fair to who? So you voted to authorize a strike but then don't really want to? Did you think the MEC was kidding? If negotiations turn in a favor after this vote then clearly Ed realizes we very well could strike. If he truly believed we would never strike then why change the play after 4 years of dragging feet?

I have yet to fly with even one pilot who channels your anger (thankfully). Don't get "willing to strike" confused with "eagerly looking forward to it." I think of a strike like using the atom bomb. No one WANTED to use it in 1945 or any other year. In extreme and rare circumstances it was necessary. I am WILLING AND ABLE to strike. I don't WANT to. You DO want to.

And as for your "more than anything, I want Ed gone" comment from an earlier post--get real. I don't like him at all. But to anyone other than pilots and mechanics, he is nearly deity on the Delta property. He says all the right things that the rest of the employee group loves, hands out "Eddie Bears" and they all think he walks on water. Don't think for one nanosecond that we will have one molecule of support from anyone else outside mechanics and perhaps a few hard-nosed former NWA flight attendants. Telling the BOD "the pilots want Ed gone" will merely elicit a chuckle and "duly noted" response.

Rooster435 11-16-2022 11:41 AM


Originally Posted by JustNarced (Post 3532850)
So then you are happy with the direction the airline has been heading over the past 4 years? What exactly is "fair?" Who decides fair? Fair to who? So you voted to authorize a strike but then don't really want to? Did you think the MEC was kidding? If negotiations turn in a favor after this vote then clearly Ed realizes we very well could strike. If he truly believed we would never strike then why change the play after 4 years of dragging feet?

Being willing to strike and wanting to strike are two completely different things. I would say 98.9% are in the first category and you are holding down the fort in the second.

tcco94 11-16-2022 11:50 AM


Originally Posted by JustNarced (Post 3532791)
We've dragged negotiations to the end, I am not about to settle on anything with a strike around the corner. We will get released. At this point I am after much more than I would've accepted at the end of 2019. I now want trip construction back and above all else, Ed gone. I'd park this airline tomorrow, everyone I know feels the same way.

I've made up my mind that we are striking, at a minimum.

So you would rather pick a strike than a contract? Weird flex

notEnuf 11-16-2022 11:56 AM


Originally Posted by tcco94 (Post 3532926)
So you would rather pick a strike than a contract? Weird flex

Flex? Define "contract" and then we'll see who's flexing. I want to strike just to remind everyone involved it is a tool not to be discounted, as it always is. LBFO after 30 days will clear up a lot.

tcco94 11-16-2022 12:27 PM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 3532929)
Flex? Define "contract" and then we'll see who's flexing. I want to strike just to remind everyone involved it is a tool not to be discounted, as it always is. LBFO after 30 days will clear up a lot.

Define “contract”, what?

again weird flex you have that you would rather go on strike as a message than have a contract we deserve. It’s just an odd thing to say. Majority of us would like a contract we deserve. I‘m not really sure what your motives are, but really don’t care either way.

CBreezy 11-16-2022 12:30 PM


Originally Posted by tcco94 (Post 3532965)
Define “contract”, what?

again weird flex you have that you would rather go on strike as a message than have a contract we deserve. It’s just an odd thing to say. Majority of us would like a contract we deserve. I‘m not really sure what your motives are, but really don’t care either way.

There are probably 10% of cranky old dudes who want to go on strike as punishment to management. They aren't interested in using the strike as a tool but want to inflict as much pain as possible no matter what they are offering. It's very counterproductive

notEnuf 11-16-2022 12:59 PM


Originally Posted by tcco94 (Post 3532965)
Define “contract”, what?

again weird flex you have that you would rather go on strike as a message than have a contract we deserve. It’s just an odd thing to say. Majority of us would like a the contract we deserve. I‘m not really sure what your motives are, but really don’t care either way.

Now you are starting to add definition. Yes, I'd rather flex than settle for a contract.

HeH8Me 11-16-2022 12:59 PM


Originally Posted by BigHitterLlama (Post 3532909)
WTF. Emailed the NYC FO rep a week ago saying vote for anybody but Hartmann. Got no reply. Now I know why.

I about upchucked myself…based on my interactions with him…we’re definitely “fooked”…don’t expect much fellas on this or future contracts…but he’ll be fine..

JamesBond 11-16-2022 02:10 PM


Originally Posted by tunes (Post 3532763)
If delta cut a retro check for 1.2 billion, they just got a 3 year contract for only 1.2 billion. That’s extremely cheap for them


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is an excellent point. It really illustrates the fact that work rules and soft monies that are lost... are lost forever. All we can recover... is pay. My minimum just went up.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:48 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands