Search
Notices

Minimum Balance Plan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2022, 01:23 PM
  #61  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,870
Default

Lots of angst on this issue for no reason. If any demographic, especially a very small one, is seen as being favored to the detriment of a large majority the proposed deal will get shot down in flames. “Ain’t it a shame…. to be shot down in flames.” We have all seen a MEC try to sell a deal that the Pilot group at large doesn’t like and it doesn’t end well for the MEC. Think DAPLA 2015 and UAL 2022.

No way around the memory rat.

And FWIW BK was 17 years ago, not 15.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 11-12-2022, 02:05 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,422
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
It was certainly a huge win for the junior pilots!
IMO not really more than any other group.

my relative seniority barley moved after the VEOP and for almost a year after and they still tried to furlough 1941 of us.

I’m fact I would argue the benefit for the bottom was the least pronounced at the time. the top 3rd saw a very large amount of their peers retire which opened up a huge amount of WBA slots as well as significant improvement in relative seniority for whatever category they were in at the time. For the middle 1/3 of the list, Many of them were able to reinstate to their previous positions or bid for a new position with much better relative seniority. while not much changed for the bottom 2000 or so until almost a year later. (It was not until April of 2021 when we were brought back to a status with an airplane and June when we hired our first pilot post Covid)
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 11-12-2022, 02:30 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
It was certainly a huge win for the junior pilots!
You are just bitter you didn’t take it, you could have been paid to travel the world instead you are on here complaining.
Nantonaku is offline  
Old 11-12-2022, 04:36 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,191
Default

Originally Posted by Nantonaku View Post
You are just bitter you didn’t take it, you could have been paid to travel the world instead you are on here complaining.
I think you are looking in a mirror. I cannot recollect 1 single positive post from you about.... well.... anything.
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 11-12-2022, 04:51 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,993
Default

Whatever this ends up being, it better be optional. I want the cash now and to control my own investments.
m3113n1a1 is online now  
Old 11-12-2022, 04:52 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1 View Post
Whatever this ends up being, it better be optional. I want the cash now and to control my own investments.
good news: it almost certainly will not be
OOfff is offline  
Old 11-12-2022, 05:05 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,993
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
good news: it almost certainly will not be
Way to ruin my dreams
m3113n1a1 is online now  
Old 11-12-2022, 06:16 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers View Post
I think you are looking in a mirror. I cannot recollect 1 single positive post from you about.... well.... anything.
You boomers all stick together don’t you?
Nantonaku is offline  
Old 11-12-2022, 10:07 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: Cirrus CA
Posts: 224
Default

If it’s not optional it will be voted down.

No one will get a windfall at the expense of those junior to them. If this is a possibility, it will get voted down.

That is all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NavyFlyer is offline  
Old 11-13-2022, 03:48 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,226
Default

Originally Posted by NavyFlyer View Post
If it’s not optional it will be voted down.

No one will get a windfall at the expense of those junior to them. If this is a possibility, it will get voted down.

That is all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The MBCMP (Market Based Cash Balance Plan) is completely independent and separate from the Minimum Balance.

The MBCBP can exist without the Min Balance. The MBCBP may or may not be optional, depending on the Department of the Treasury’s decision on the matter, and is not a windfall for anyone, senior or not. It’s simple a tax-deferred vehicle for excess DPSP Cash.

The Minimum Balance, however, would be a windfall for a small section of the folks screwed from their DB retirement plans.

They are two completely different things.
FangsF15 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TonyC
FedEx
243
06-13-2022 11:27 AM
Poeman
FedEx
1140
02-22-2022 03:37 PM
kronan
FedEx
241
07-12-2021 10:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices