Notices

In “retro” spect…

Old 01-03-2023 | 12:23 AM
  #1  
newKnow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default In “retro” spect…

…. We are spending a lot of time calculating what we should have gotten for retro pay, but I bet within a year we will wish we had a “‘me too” clause with our Delta Flight attendants pay raises, instead of United or American pilots.

My guess is 5 months. Anyone else care to guess when, or if it will happen?
Reply
Old 01-03-2023 | 02:17 AM
  #2  
Jaww's Avatar
Rerouted On Weekends
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
From: 717A
Default

Is this a serious post?
Reply
Old 01-03-2023 | 03:16 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,474
Likes: 1,038
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
…. We are spending a lot of time calculating what we should have gotten for retro pay, but I bet within a year we will wish we had a “‘me too” clause with our Delta Flight attendants pay raises, instead of United or American pilots.

My guess is 5 months. Anyone else care to guess when, or if it will happen?
My guess is that a single precent of "me too" with United is a greater dollar value raise in compensation than the entirety of what they get paid.
Reply
Old 01-03-2023 | 04:39 AM
  #4  
Jaww's Avatar
Rerouted On Weekends
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
From: 717A
Default

I read this wrong and apologize. I thought this was another apples and oranges comparison of FA and pilot pay.

I don’t think it will matter very much. Applicants will shotgun apply, just like pilots, and most will stick with whomever hired them first. Some will leave for better pastures, we will gain some from others. Some will likely quit the profession altogether. In the end, I think delta will keep pay rates comparable so it shouldn’t even be a factor.
Reply
Old 01-03-2023 | 04:49 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,474
Likes: 1,038
Default

Originally Posted by Jaww
I read this wrong and apologize. I thought this was another apples and oranges comparison of FA and pilot pay.

I don’t think it will matter very much. Applicants will shotgun apply, just like pilots, and most will stick with whomever hired them first. Some will leave for better pastures, we will gain some from others. Some will likely quit the profession altogether. In the end, I think delta will keep pay rates comparable so it shouldn’t even be a factor.
Did I miss a post because that's exactly how I am reading it.
Reply
Old 01-03-2023 | 06:36 AM
  #6  
newKnow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
My guess is that a single precent of "me too" with United is a greater dollar value raise in compensation than the entirety of what they get paid.
1.) Not dollar amount. Percentages. As in, if the company raises other employer groups pay a certain percent, our pay would go up as well. Doesn’t have to be 1:1. 30% could get us 3%. 20% could get us 2%. 10% could get is 1%. .

2.)I’m guessing neither UAL or AA will surpass our wide body rates. I bet the company is pretty sure of that too. Most of my buds at UAL would take our new pay rates and gains in other areas of their contract.

All I’m saying is it’s likely that it would have been more advantageous for us to tie an increase in our pay rates to our company’s strong desire to keep the FA’s non unionized over another company and its pilots commitment to paying its wide body pilots more than us.
Reply
Old 01-03-2023 | 06:39 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,474
Likes: 1,038
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
1.) Not dollar amount. Percentages. As in, if the company raises other employer groups pay a certain percent, our pay would go up as well. Doesn’t have to be 1:1. 30% could get us 3%. 20% could get us 2%. 10% could get is 1%. .

2.)I’m guessing neither UAL or AA will surpass our wide body rates. I bet the company is pretty sure of that too. Most of my buds at UAL would take our new pay rates and gains in other areas of their contract.

All I’m saying is it’s likely that it would have been more advantageous for us to tie an increase in our pay rates to our company’s strong desire to keep the FA’s non unionized over another company and its pilots commitment to paying its wide body pilots more than us.
And I think it's disingenuous to compare % raises of a group that, on average, makes 20-30% of what we make, and that's just in rates only. I'm not saying we shouldn't have a "me too" that triggers some sort of raise, but, no, I don't think it's reasonable for us to get a 16% raise if they get a 16% raise.
Reply
Old 01-03-2023 | 06:47 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
And I think it's disingenuous to compare % raises of a group that, on average, makes 20-30% of what we make, and that's just in rates only. I'm not saying we shouldn't have a "me too" that triggers some sort of raise, but, no, I don't think it's reasonable for us to get a 16% raise if they get a 16% raise.
Pretty certain that was acknowledged in the post you replied to.
Reply
Old 01-03-2023 | 06:48 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,474
Likes: 1,038
Default

Originally Posted by Iceberg
Pretty certain that was acknowledged in the post you replied to.
Thanks. I glossed over it. I apologize to the previous OP
Reply
Old 01-03-2023 | 08:05 AM
  #10  
Jaww's Avatar
Rerouted On Weekends
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
From: 717A
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Did I miss a post because that's exactly how I am reading it.
If that’s the case I stand by my original statement.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices