In “retro” spect…
#21
Believe it or not, I actually just meant what I said - nothing more or less. No, I don’t seek pay stagnation any more than you do. I just don’t care to create a connection with an unrelated workgroup. I don’t care about non-unionized/non-contract employee compensation or work rules. NMFP. I’m not a flight attendant, I’m not a dispatcher, I don’t work at the GO starbucks and I don’t clean lavs or fix airplanes.
If you want to correlate our pay in some way to executive compensation, that’s a different animal. But no, I honestly don’t want to synch up with 20,000 employees whose job qualifications and training couldn’t be more different than mine. That type of trigger might sound like a nice backstop, but it wouldn’t come without negotiations and likely some quid pro quo. No thanks.
If you want to correlate our pay in some way to executive compensation, that’s a different animal. But no, I honestly don’t want to synch up with 20,000 employees whose job qualifications and training couldn’t be more different than mine. That type of trigger might sound like a nice backstop, but it wouldn’t come without negotiations and likely some quid pro quo. No thanks.
#22
First it was payrate thirst over Endeavor now it's payrate thirst over our FAs. Do pilots not understand the law of large number wrt pay increases by percentage? Lusting over pay increases of workgroups that not only pay significantly less than pilots, but also significantly worse workrules is beneath the Delta pilots. Stop the madness
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,127
Likes: 84
You're not in the C-suite. You ARE an employee. The internal parity is what matters. This is about Delta's ability to afford the labor it employs. The rate trigger tied to an outside group or government measurement would be fine but it doesn't motivate Delta. Instead we consistently fail to add value to a contract that is locking in today's rates for years to come. This is like being on the wrong end of a futures trade by choice and consistently accepting that outcome. It's absolutely ridiculous that our contract can be regulated to be outdated and we don't mitigate that risk. If the .gov wanted to set pricing on tickets and keep them low for years without resolution, Delta and the airlines would find a way around it. Surcharges for fuel, or charge separately for each part of the service, or some other mechanism. What they would NOT do is be OK with it and accept it consistently. We are morons when it comes to business contracts.
Next up, talk us through how we get 5:15 vacation and training, six weeks of vacation, 25% DC, raises that always exceed inflation, pay rates that always match our decades-past high water mark, qol gains that beat every industry…all while we work less.
#24
First it was payrate thirst over Endeavor now it's payrate thirst over our FAs. Do pilots not understand the law of large number wrt pay increases by percentage? Lusting over pay increases of workgroups that not only pay significantly less than pilots, but also significantly worse workrules is beneath the Delta pilots. Stop the madness
#25
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 976
Likes: 76
You're not in the C-suite. You ARE an employee. The internal parity is what matters. This is about Delta's ability to afford the labor it employs. The rate trigger tied to an outside group or government measurement would be fine but it doesn't motivate Delta. Instead we consistently fail to add value to a contract that is locking in today's rates for years to come. This is like being on the wrong end of a futures trade by choice and consistently accepting that outcome. It's absolutely ridiculous that our contract can be regulated to be outdated and we don't mitigate that risk. If the .gov wanted to set pricing on tickets and keep them low for years without resolution, Delta and the airlines would find a way around it. Surcharges for fuel, or charge separately for each part of the service, or some other mechanism. What they would NOT do is be OK with it and accept it consistently. We are morons when it comes to business contracts.
A5S
#26
First it was payrate thirst over Endeavor now it's payrate thirst over our FAs. Do pilots not understand the law of large number wrt pay increases by percentage? Lusting over pay increases of workgroups that not only pay significantly less than pilots, but also significantly worse workrules is beneath the Delta pilots. Stop the madness
There are a few reasons why I suggest it in the future.
1.) We should be tired of the company giving other employees pay raises from money they say they didn't have for us. They were broke in October. l bet ironically, all of a sudden, they will have tons of cash by May.
2.). Besides the current UAL +5% rates for their Covid agreement, when was the last time United or American negotiated higher wide body pay rates than Delta?
#27
There are a few reasons why I suggest it in the future.
1.) We should be tired of the company giving other employees pay raises from money they say they didn't have for us. They were broke in October. l bet ironically, all of a sudden, they will have tons of cash by May.
2.). Besides the current UAL +5% rates for their Covid agreement, when was the last time United or American negotiated higher wide body pay rates than Delta?
1.) We should be tired of the company giving other employees pay raises from money they say they didn't have for us. They were broke in October. l bet ironically, all of a sudden, they will have tons of cash by May.
2.). Besides the current UAL +5% rates for their Covid agreement, when was the last time United or American negotiated higher wide body pay rates than Delta?
#28
United in 2000.They did give credit for that rate to Delta achieving the "Delta Dot" which was what they referred to our new 777 rate when we first got the aircraft. On the chart of industry rates, the dot was an obvious outlier. It set the stage for the United rates and our UAL+ campaign achieved an even higher rate for us.
I don’t really expect them to do it now. It would be a nice surprise though.
That’s my point.
#29
I agree completely. United and American both have a lengthy history of being incapable of setting a new bar for everyone else to leap frog in pattern bargaining. We need national to get the respective neg comms on the same sheet of music a little more.
#30
Looks like the American prediction has come true.
Let's see what United does...


