In “retro” spect…
#11
…. We are spending a lot of time calculating what we should have gotten for retro pay, but I bet within a year we will wish we had a “‘me too” clause with our Delta Flight attendants pay raises, instead of United or American pilots.
My guess is 5 months. Anyone else care to guess when, or if it will happen?
My guess is 5 months. Anyone else care to guess when, or if it will happen?
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 68
I have always thought we should have a me too for the non-cons post amendable date. If the company can afford a 4% raise for the majority of the employees we should get it too, while working out the details of the PWA. Our contract never expires but yet our payscale does, how stupid is that?
#14
#17
So you are fine with pay stagnation after 4 years when your contract is again overdue? The whole retro fiasco, slowed/rushed timeline for the PWA would be moo. Explain to me why you don't want a pay mechanism that accounts for the non expiration of the perpetual PWA.
#18
Im for a mechanism, but not one tied to non-cons. This will eventually boomerang on us.
#19
If the company has enough to pay other employees after crying broke to us — pay us a percentage too.
If the company has enough money to pay millions to buy 49% of another airline — give us a 5% raise.
If the company has enough money to buy stock back — pay us too.
We should always be looking to think out of the box for our advantage. You can best believe the company is always doing this. It’s why we keep getting beat.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,127
Likes: 89
If you want to correlate our pay in some way to executive compensation, that’s a different animal. But no, I honestly don’t want to synch up with 20,000 employees whose job qualifications and training couldn’t be more different than mine. That type of trigger might sound like a nice backstop, but it wouldn’t come without negotiations and likely some quid pro quo. No thanks.



