![]() |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 3628980)
Have you volunteered to help?
|
Originally Posted by 3 green
(Post 3629013)
...they said we don't have the funds to bring on more people.
|
Originally Posted by FL370esq
(Post 3629025)
Hmmmmmmm....are they really "volunteers" if the committee need funds to bring them on? I keeed....😁
|
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3629024)
I shouldn’t have to volunteer to get a timely resolution. That’s why I pay dues money. Expecting results isn’t a crazy notion. I agree, however, this is caused by delta but if we do not adapt to the changing landscape we WILL lose. I have also volunteered to volunteer and have been turned away. Stop using that as a go to argument, they don’t want volunteers, they just want the ability to complain about it when you call them out.
|
Originally Posted by Meme In Command
(Post 3629038)
But why are we blaming ALPA for their inability to keep up with the barrage of scheduling violations from the company? They're struggling to fix the problem, not the ones causing it.
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 3628899)
ALPA is failing. It’s time to hire and train non-pilots with our millions of dues money. I was dead serious. ACE is a failure. I picked 2 days because that is how long the scheduling committee used to take before they all quit. In another 6 months, we’ll be 9-12 months behind.
It’s easy to have a 3 or 4 people and a handful of staff when there’s plenty of pilots and everything just percolates along with a couple hundred green slips a month across the whole airline. ACE has made it so easy to file a report, everyone does it. I flew with one guy who said “yea, I file one everyone month that just says “here’s my schedule, find me money”. I’m sure that doesn’t help the turnaround time. |
Current data point.
1 JAN. Stuck in NYC, can't commute home. ARCOS calls for 1 day BDA turn GS. I pick it, am #1 when when the window closes. I SCREENSHOT THIS. It's been in OT out of a hub for over 14 hours. Window closes. No award. I call CS and go WTF. "You are not BDA qualified" (it's not a special qual airport" They reroute a DTW 320 Captain to do it. I ace it twice. Once for me and once for the DTW Captain. He was the recipient of an illegal reroute, so he should be getting paid. I got paid 8:01 which just showed up on my JAN timecard as 4F1R. Rough timeline: Dec 31, shenanigans detected. Jan 1 ACE Filed Apr 13 Scheduling committee reviews finds 23N was violated for the DTW Captain and 23.Q.12.a.b.c violated for me and summitted to company. Apr 21-26 somewhere in there it showed up on my JAN timecard as 8:01 pay and credit Now, I wait and see an actual pay hit my account, but this is the rough timeline. That said, ACE works well, and I got the abbreviated history on how it came to be and how it gets improved from the former MEC chair who was there when it was coming into being. It does help keep things moving. The VOLUME is unprecedented. Now how much of that is "it's made it easy to report" and "the company is just going stupid with illegal stuff" is probably 20/80 split but that's just my WAG. If you are unhappy with turnaround time, they can use volunteers. In the last year, ACE has gotten me 38:31 at 320A pay, and probably half that to other pilots that I have reported on them doing illegal reroutes, 23M7 etc. That's over $10,500 not counting PS, 401K, etc. Just gross cash to me. I'd say ACE is a winner. |
Originally Posted by NuGuy
(Post 3629045)
ACE has made it so easy to file a report, everyone does it. I flew with one guy who said “yea, I file one everyone month that just says “here’s my schedule, find me money”. I’m sure that doesn’t help the turnaround time.
|
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3629042)
Because they don’t want to change. The few in power hoarde it and don’t want their fiefdoms challenged by newcomers. ACE was a great idea that allowed the few to stay in charge rather than expanding to more volunteers. It doesn’t work with the company willfully violating everything. They need to adapt again and allow some new blood in.
|
Originally Posted by 3 green
(Post 3629013)
They cannot take any more volunteers in the scheduling committee; I asked about 6 months ago, and they said we don't have the funds to bring on more people. In reality, they need about 50 more volunteers to handle all the PWA violations that are related to ACE submissions.
Maybe they could pare back the number of volunteers who are "rewarded" by being taken to the biennial beachfront/Vegas drink fest at the BOD meeting... Maybe the commuting MEC chairman could move to where his business actually is, instead of making ALPA pay for his lodging in ATL... Maybe ask the volunteers to actually VOLUNTEER instead of paying them all full time flight pay loss to miss trips, then letting them pick up GS on off days. Look, I just found about a million dollars more to fund contract compliance. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:00 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands