Search

Notices

IA Calls

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2023 | 06:52 AM
  #271  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,339
Likes: 829
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by MrBojangles
yeah and what changed? It starts with Opti and ends in mizer.
It's like crack in the 80s or fentanyl today. They are so addicted to it that they can't imaging how to operate without it. The optimizer is no longer an addiction, its become the way of life. They literally can't operate or build trips without it.
Reply
Old 05-26-2023 | 06:52 AM
  #272  
MrBojangles's Avatar
Line Holder
10 Years
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 643
Likes: 52
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
Help me understand the difference in category size as it affects batch size preferences.

If I’m in a category with 400 pilots and there are 3 trips to cover, a batch size of 15 means I have a one in 5 chance of being the selected pilot for a green slip.

If I’m in a category of 100 pilots there and there are 3 trips to cover, a batch size of 15 means I have a one in 5 chance of being the selected pilot for a green slip.

Am I to understand that larger category pilots want more headfakes with the tradeoff that they get through the coverage process faster? Why isn’t anyone discouraged by the total response window going to 25 minutes from the historic 10? I’d rather shorten that myself than open myself to more headfakes.
Math is the issue..it's not your chances of the trip, it's the time it takes to get down the list. Once people that actually want to fly the trips get GS1, as the month goes on those people just fishing for 23M7 and batch violation money go to the top of the ARCOS list since they haven't take a GS yet. So as the month goes on it takes longer and longer to find a person that will actually fly the trip. I've been past 200 before on the callout list. It's impossible if you have a trip signing in lets say in 5 hours with a batch size of 5 to get through all that (that would get them to 100 on the list). And that's just GS. That doesn't account for WS and OOBWS.
Reply
Old 05-26-2023 | 07:32 AM
  #273  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MrBojangles
Math is the issue..it's not your chances of the trip, it's the time it takes to get down the list. Once people that actually want to fly the trips get GS1, as the month goes on those people just fishing for 23M7 and batch violation money go to the top of the ARCOS list since they haven't take a GS yet. So as the month goes on it takes longer and longer to find a person that will actually fly the trip. I've been past 200 before on the callout list. It's impossible if you have a trip signing in lets say in 5 hours with a batch size of 5 to get through all that (that would get them to 100 on the list). And that's just GS. That doesn't account for WS and OOBWS.
Thanks for this explanation. I didn’t see it this way until you made it clear. So the real issue is GS#2 or 3 or … and later in the month. I see the problem now from your point of view. I am still not convinced we should solve this Company problem without a significant quid but I see the issue better.
Reply
Old 05-26-2023 | 07:50 AM
  #274  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 113
Default

Originally Posted by MrBojangles
Math is the issue..it's not your chances of the trip, it's the time it takes to get down the list. Once people that actually want to fly the trips get GS1, as the month goes on those people just fishing for 23M7 and batch violation money go to the top of the ARCOS list since they haven't take a GS yet. So as the month goes on it takes longer and longer to find a person that will actually fly the trip. I've been past 200 before on the callout list. It's impossible if you have a trip signing in lets say in 5 hours with a batch size of 5 to get through all that (that would get them to 100 on the list). And that's just GS. That doesn't account for WS and OOBWS.

Roger, thanks.
Reply
Old 05-26-2023 | 08:10 AM
  #275  
dragon's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
From: Dismayed
Default

Originally Posted by MrBojangles
Math is the issue..it's not your chances of the trip, it's the time it takes to get down the list. Once people that actually want to fly the trips get GS1, as the month goes on those people just fishing for 23M7 and batch violation money go to the top of the ARCOS list since they haven't take a GS yet. So as the month goes on it takes longer and longer to find a person that will actually fly the trip. I've been past 200 before on the callout list. It's impossible if you have a trip signing in lets say in 5 hours with a batch size of 5 to get through all that (that would get them to 100 on the list). And that's just GS. That doesn't account for WS and OOBWS.
It's still not our problem. The company chose to optimize the rotations, they chose to let all of the experienced schedulers leave, they chose to not admit mistakes were made with manning in 2020 and they are continuing to not upgrade their technology. Schedulers still have to work in DOS, I really don't know how ARCOS is loaded for the calls but suspect it is not nearly a simple process. The company has still chosen to not staff the airline correctly and relies on premium pay to cover trips.

Did I leave out, the company still wants to violate the contract any way they can because - IROP. IROP is not a get out of jail free card, especially if it is self inflicted.
Reply
Old 05-26-2023 | 08:17 AM
  #276  
MrBojangles's Avatar
Line Holder
10 Years
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 643
Likes: 52
Default

Originally Posted by interceptorpilo
Thanks for this explanation. I didn’t see it this way until you made it clear. So the real issue is GS#2 or 3 or … and later in the month. I see the problem now from your point of view. I am still not convinced we should solve this Company problem without a significant quid but I see the issue better.
yeah GS1 is no issue (at least if you're senior enough). I suspect if we could look at the data you'd see RR and IA rise as the month goes on to cover trips at least on these massive NB fleets. Believe me, i'd definitely like to solve this issue and get something in return and that's what I have told my reps numerous times for years now.
Reply
Old 05-26-2023 | 12:09 PM
  #277  
DWC CAP10 USAF's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,008
Likes: 211
From: Looking left
Default

Originally Posted by MrBojangles
yeah GS1 is no issue (at least if you're senior enough). I suspect if we could look at the data you'd see RR and IA rise as the month goes on to cover trips at least on these massive NB fleets. Believe me, i'd definitely like to solve this issue and get something in return and that's what I have told my reps numerous times for years now.
We’ve hired 3000 pilots in the past 18 months but almost all NB FO categories are still negative reserve coverage…batch sizes aren’t the problem!
Reply
Old 05-26-2023 | 04:16 PM
  #278  
MrBojangles's Avatar
Line Holder
10 Years
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 643
Likes: 52
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
We’ve hired 3000 pilots in the past 18 months but almost all NB FO categories are still negative reserve coverage…batch sizes aren’t the problem!
one of the issues with those numbers is the screwed up equation used to derive reserves required. it got all messed up during the covid times and after when we got all those premium trips. I thought they were addressing that also. and batch sizes are the problem when it comes to COVERING premium trips. It's not why the trips are created however-that's staffing, or fatiguing trips, or whatever you wanna blame it on
Reply
Old 05-26-2023 | 06:27 PM
  #279  
DWC CAP10 USAF's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,008
Likes: 211
From: Looking left
Default

Originally Posted by MrBojangles
one of the issues with those numbers is the screwed up equation used to derive reserves required. it got all messed up during the covid times and after when we got all those premium trips. I thought they were addressing that also. and batch sizes are the problem when it comes to COVERING premium trips. It's not why the trips are created however-that's staffing, or fatiguing trips, or whatever you wanna blame it on
Equation be damned…this could have been a non event if network only built a schedule they could actually fly based on the number of pilots we actually have.
Reply
Old 05-26-2023 | 07:21 PM
  #280  
MrBojangles's Avatar
Line Holder
10 Years
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 643
Likes: 52
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
Equation be damned…this could have been a non event if network only built a schedule they could actually fly based on the number of pilots we actually have.
i agree, but we're talking about 2 different issues here. what you're bringing up is certainly a big issue, but has nothing to do with how trips are covered. i'm with you 100% on that being the reason so many trips are in open time, why our QOL sucks and we aren't able to drop trips and so forth.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AnotherEagleGuy
PSA Airlines
52
12-02-2015 04:58 PM
izanti
Hangar Talk
2
08-09-2013 05:43 PM
Trent900
Major
73
07-31-2013 07:05 PM
5ontheglide
United
141
01-08-2013 03:16 PM
Free Flyer
Major
14
02-17-2006 04:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices