Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
United CJO vs Delta CJO >

United CJO vs Delta CJO

Search

Notices

United CJO vs Delta CJO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2023 | 06:35 AM
  #31  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

The current version of the age 67 legislation has a return-to-work entitlement. Many of Delta's VEOP's are chomping at the new pay rates (and they've forgotten what you have to live through to earn those rates). Age 67, as written, is a bigger deal than age 65 was. (I have no idea if the terms of Delta's VEOP will hold against Federal Law, but it will be tested).

All other things being equal, I'd go where that has less of an effect.
Reply
Old 06-27-2023 | 06:35 AM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 665
Likes: 48
Default

Originally Posted by Plabelover
how long do you think someone will be on reserve for?
It’s impossible to know for someone hired today because United has hired so many in the last couple years and we don’t know when the 787’s will come in with Boeing’s supply chain issues. We’re probably talking about at least a few years though.
Reply
Old 06-27-2023 | 06:43 AM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
The current version of the age 67 legislation has a return-to-work entitlement. Many of Delta's VEOP's are chomping at the new pay rates (and they've forgotten what you have to live through to earn those rates). Age 67, as written, is a bigger deal than age 65 was. (I have no idea if the terms of Delta's VEOP will hold against Federal Law, but it will be tested).

All other things being equal, I'd go where that has less of an effect.
There is no way the VEOPS are coming back unless it's the bottom of the list. They took a buyout and voluntarily gave up their seniority rights. That's a lot different than someone who aged out at 65.
Reply
Old 06-27-2023 | 08:08 AM
  #34  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Tropical
There is no way the VEOPS are coming back unless it's the bottom of the list. They took a buyout and voluntarily gave up their seniority rights. That's a lot different than someone who aged out at 65.
Maybe, maybe not. Have not seen the final version of the law, nor the contract the VEOPs signed. It surprised me the law had a right to return. That provision was explicitly not in the age 65 legislation. It is my understanding, based on reporting, that the legislator who inserted the current language has a brother who is a Delta pilot.

In other words, whoever inserted it has a specific end-state goal in mind that 99% of Congress wouldn't even be aware of, or care about.

Courts are getting to be more human and less objective. I've seen results, even in DL administrative law cases, that I've not believed. ... sometimes a judge just wants to help someone out and they get incongruently subjective.
Reply
Old 06-27-2023 | 09:43 AM
  #35  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
. It is my understanding, based on reporting, that the legislator who inserted the current language has a brother who is a Delta pilot.
What’s the source on this?
Reply
Old 06-27-2023 | 09:52 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
What’s the source on this?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tedreed...-congress/amp/
Reply
Old 06-27-2023 | 09:54 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 49
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Maybe, maybe not. Have not seen the final version of the law, nor the contract the VEOPs signed. It surprised me the law had a right to return. That provision was explicitly not in the age 65 legislation. It is my understanding, based on reporting, that the legislator who inserted the current language has a brother who is a Delta pilot.

In other words, whoever inserted it has a specific end-state goal in mind that 99% of Congress wouldn't even be aware of, or care about.

Courts are getting to be more human and less objective. I've seen results, even in DL administrative law cases, that I've not believed. ... sometimes a judge just wants to help someone out and they get incongruently subjective.

Interesting. If true wonder how they will handle a VEOP that got postponed until the mandatory retirement date??? Oh my, something for peeps to gnash their teeth over while awaiting AE results!
Reply
Old 06-27-2023 | 10:01 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 49
Default

Originally Posted by Dayzzofff
The bill in question references Age 67 and 364 days. That is 2.997 years which rounds to 3 years, not 2.

Course you also have posts like this ^^^ to help get folks spooled up. I have an idea, why not wait until something becomes more official before peeps lose their ever loving shiznit over possibilities? Not like we get a vote is it?
Reply
Old 06-27-2023 | 10:06 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Default

Is their brother who's a Delta pilot RoseAndBill?
Reply
Old 06-27-2023 | 10:09 AM
  #40  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

thank you.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StraightShooter
Endeavor Air
124
06-26-2023 10:23 AM
Boeing Aviator
United
9
11-25-2016 12:58 PM
Rotor2prop
Major
13
07-11-2012 10:55 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
Lbell911
Major
29
07-31-2007 05:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices