Peak Gas In China
#21
Again, I’m talking refining capacity. Not rigs, not oil reserves, refineries.
Take a look how all the big oil companies have or are getting the refineries off their books.
Like ESG isn’t a talking point? Another boogeyman to be scared of.
Sorry, I went to college 25 years ago and was an engineer.
Take a look how all the big oil companies have or are getting the refineries off their books.
Like ESG isn’t a talking point? Another boogeyman to be scared of.
Sorry, I went to college 25 years ago and was an engineer.
#22
Line Holder

Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 280
We haven’t built a new refinery in the US since the 1970s. We can pump all the crude we want out of the ground, if we can’t turn it into something useful, it’s pointless.
#24
Line Holder

Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 280
Obviously the money is from pumping it out of the ground and selling it to the suckers who turn it in MOGAS, plastics, and kerosene.
Maybe we just nationalize our refining capacity.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 34
I guess I am not clear in my questions, or just don't understand. Initially you painted oil companies as greedy because they weren't building new refineries. That is a pretty derisive label right out of the box. Does a corporation that works for the shareholders(capitalism), owe it to society to invest in strategies that lose them money? Does Delta need to upgrade their IT department because someone(you) think there are better ways?
I agree, refined petrochemicals are a national necessity. If the government stepped in to build refineries, that would solve the problem. Will the Biden administration prosecute this course of action? Capitalism will not solve this dilemma due to lead time. By the time one administration comes in and says, "Drill , baby, drill" a new administration is elected that touts, " Shut down fossil fuel".
Therein lies the conundrum to planning 10 year projects that need decades to pay off.
BTW....... I'm a self ascribed idiot that doesn't keep up with the daily in's and out's of oil, but does understand long-term implications of politics, regulations and common sense.
I agree, refined petrochemicals are a national necessity. If the government stepped in to build refineries, that would solve the problem. Will the Biden administration prosecute this course of action? Capitalism will not solve this dilemma due to lead time. By the time one administration comes in and says, "Drill , baby, drill" a new administration is elected that touts, " Shut down fossil fuel".
Therein lies the conundrum to planning 10 year projects that need decades to pay off.
BTW....... I'm a self ascribed idiot that doesn't keep up with the daily in's and out's of oil, but does understand long-term implications of politics, regulations and common sense.
#28
Line Holder

Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 280
I guess I am not clear in my questions, or just don't understand. Initially you painted oil companies as greedy because they weren't building new refineries. That is a pretty derisive label right out of the box. Does a corporation that works for the shareholders(capitalism), owe it to society to invest in strategies that lose them money? Does Delta need to upgrade their IT department because someone(you) think there are better ways?
I agree, refined petrochemicals are a national necessity. If the government stepped in to build refineries, that would solve the problem. Will the Biden administration prosecute this course of action? Capitalism will not solve this dilemma due to lead time. By the time one administration comes in and says, "Drill , baby, drill" a new administration is elected that touts, " Shut down fossil fuel".
Therein lies the conundrum to planning 10 year projects that need decades to pay off.
BTW....... I'm a self ascribed idiot that doesn't keep up with the daily in's and out's of oil, but does understand long-term implications of politics, regulations and common sense.
I agree, refined petrochemicals are a national necessity. If the government stepped in to build refineries, that would solve the problem. Will the Biden administration prosecute this course of action? Capitalism will not solve this dilemma due to lead time. By the time one administration comes in and says, "Drill , baby, drill" a new administration is elected that touts, " Shut down fossil fuel".
Therein lies the conundrum to planning 10 year projects that need decades to pay off.
BTW....... I'm a self ascribed idiot that doesn't keep up with the daily in's and out's of oil, but does understand long-term implications of politics, regulations and common sense.
Since we haven't had a new refinery built in 50 years demonstrates this isn't simply a partisan issue. Let's face it, politicians on both sides of aisle are in the pocket of oil companies.
Nationalizing refining capacity was partially tongue-in-cheek. No surer way to screw something up then get the government involved. That doesn't mean proper legislation can't force their hand. Something along the lines of not approving any new oil leases unless new refining capacity is introduced. Say new oil field is going to produce x-millions of barrels, refining capacity needs be increased x%.
Our capacity is usually around 85-90%. Refineries need to come down for maintenance, to be reconfigured depending on what blends they are putting out/what's coming in. Plus we've had numerous refineries not come back on line since COVID or get taken out by hurricanes (or just blow up).
#29
If the government has actively announced its intention to shut your industry down to, "Save the planet," why on earth would managers continue making capital investments in said industry?
#30
Line Holder

Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 280
Besides, there’s always exports.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



