Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
FAA Inspector in Jumpseat >

FAA Inspector in Jumpseat

Search

Notices

FAA Inspector in Jumpseat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2023 | 07:33 AM
  #1  
NJGov's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 365
Likes: 34
From: A319/321 FO
Default FAA Inspector in Jumpseat

FAA inspector booked for the Jumpseat on the flight I’d like to commute up on next week (new CA checkout).

do I get positive space for this even though I haven’t been ‘bumped’ as I wasn’t yet on the Jumpseat?

or do I have to show up on the day, get listed, and then denied before calling CS?

or am I just out of luck altogether and need to make alternate arrangements?
Reply
Old 10-18-2023 | 07:38 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,480
Likes: 1,052
Default

Originally Posted by NJGov
FAA inspector booked for the Jumpseat on the flight I’d like to commute up on next week (new CA checkout).

do I get positive space for this even though I haven’t been ‘bumped’ as I wasn’t yet on the Jumpseat?

or do I have to show up on the day, get listed, and then denied before calling CS?

or am I just out of luck altogether and need to make alternate arrangements?
You're out of luck. The previous agreement to book PS was only valid if you were booked then bumped. Honestly though, it was never contractual and the manager of crew assist has claimed that they no longer do that. They actually said they never did it, which is not true, but the company just says what they want these days. Either way, follow UTC clause in FOM for PS
Reply
Old 10-18-2023 | 08:31 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 387
Likes: 31
Default

FAA shows up and bumps me out of the JS? Well damn, cough cough. I’m going home and delta can burn a GS and reschedule me another day.
Reply
Old 10-18-2023 | 08:37 AM
  #4  
PaulFooley's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Default

Deleted: Re-read the original post and see that my boring story wasn't even relevant for the OP.

Last edited by PaulFooley; 10-18-2023 at 08:51 AM. Reason: Lazy reader
Reply
Old 10-18-2023 | 08:44 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,245
Likes: 1,088
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
You're out of luck. The previous agreement to book PS was only valid if you were booked then bumped. Honestly though, it was never contractual and the manager of crew assist has claimed that they no longer do that. They actually said they never did it, which is not true, but the company just says what they want these days. Either way, follow UTC clause in FOM for PS
Which is funny, because the end result for the company is the same. They end up coughing up a PS seat, just on a later flight with a shorter delay buffer before your working flight.

The company is on an anti-PS optics crusade in a way that they never were before the Covid LOA. Remember when every major IROP was preceded by an email authorizing blanket positive space travel to work? Today the emails simply say “Good luck, plan your commutes accordingly”.
Reply
Old 10-18-2023 | 08:52 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,480
Likes: 1,052
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
Which is funny, because the end result for the company is the same. They end up coughing up a PS seat, just on a later flight with a shorter delay buffer before your working flight.

The company is on an anti-PS optics crusade in a way that they never were before the Covid LOA. Remember when every major IROP was preceded by an email authorizing blanket positive space travel to work? Today the emails simply say “Good luck, plan your commutes accordingly”.
Their crusade is absurd and juvenile.
Reply
Old 10-18-2023 | 09:32 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 316
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
You're out of luck. The previous agreement to book PS was only valid if you were booked then bumped. Honestly though, it was never contractual and the manager of crew assist has claimed that they no longer do that. They actually said they never did it, which is not true, but the company just says what they want these days. Either way, follow UTC clause in FOM for PS
Unbelievable. I read the thing from ALPA and I know in the past, I was given PS to work when bumped by FAA if I had js booked first. It’s no longer there. Just deadheaded in economy in back of plane. I was in third to last row in an aisle. I thought we improved our deadhead language in new PWA? Just one more section the company doesn’t like so is refusing to comply with.
Reply
Old 10-18-2023 | 09:47 AM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,773
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Unbelievable. I read the thing from ALPA and I know in the past, I was given PS to work when bumped by FAA if I had js booked first. It’s no longer there. Just deadheaded in economy in back of plane. I was in third to last row in an aisle. I thought we improved our deadhead language in new PWA? Just one more section the company doesn’t like so is refusing to comply with.
“Deadhead” means the surface or air transportation of a pilot between airports at the instruction of the Company.
Exception one: Surface transportation to or from an airport for the sole purpose of lodging is not a deadhead.
Exception two: Travel to and from training is not a deadhead.

Commuting to work or from work is not a deadhead. Why would deadhead language apply to people who choose not to live in base 👿
Reply
Old 10-18-2023 | 09:58 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,480
Likes: 1,052
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Unbelievable. I read the thing from ALPA and I know in the past, I was given PS to work when bumped by FAA if I had js booked first. It’s no longer there. Just deadheaded in economy in back of plane. I was in third to last row in an aisle. I thought we improved our deadhead language in new PWA? Just one more section the company doesn’t like so is refusing to comply with.
As was said below, commuting is not a DH. It's PS. It's not a DH when you utilize UTC or the Commuter clause. Bumped by training/FAA PS to work was never on the contract or the FOM. It was something that company did as a courtesy. Believe me, I've tried to find it written down everywhere.
Reply
Old 10-18-2023 | 03:10 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 316
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
As was said below, commuting is not a DH. It's PS. It's not a DH when you utilize UTC or the Commuter clause. Bumped by training/FAA PS to work was never on the contract or the FOM. It was something that company did as a courtesy. Believe me, I've tried to find it written down everywhere.
It used to be written in FOM. It’s no longer there.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OFT1
Pilot Health
14
01-30-2023 07:05 PM
docav8tor
Safety
0
07-29-2019 10:56 AM
FEtrip7
Cargo
41
02-16-2012 02:25 PM
vagabond
Aviation Law
2
12-10-2010 06:56 AM
WatchThis!
Regional
63
07-11-2008 09:52 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices