Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
PB's Letter - DALPA?  Anyone?  Bueller? >

PB's Letter - DALPA? Anyone? Bueller?


Notices

PB's Letter - DALPA? Anyone? Bueller?

Old 11-30-2023 | 04:29 PM
  #51  
Valar Morghulis's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 480
Likes: 66
Default

Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
UAL had already turned on TI, if that’s who you are referring to. The UAL TA was a disaster, and he lost the support of his own pilot group.
But ANCMAN said it was all about politics and cronyism, so the support of the pilots shouldn’t matter.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 05:39 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 1,181
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
Can you point to an effective leadership model in modern democracies that is insulated from cronyism? What might you propose we try to emulate?
No system is fully insulated from cronyism. My point was simply that opening the MEC Chairman vote to 16,000+ pilots, the very people who the organization represents, provides much more insulation from cronyism than a poll among a couple dozen politicians. We should have a say as to who fills the role of our most prominent representative.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 05:46 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 1,181
Default

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis
But ANCMAN said it was all about politics and cronyism, so the support of the pilots shouldn’t matter.
When you commit a blunder the size of Insler’s, it becomes politically dangerous to continue supporting him. His loss of support wasn’t limited to pilots.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 05:54 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,524
Likes: 1,114
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
No system is fully insulated from cronyism. My point was simply that opening the MEC Chairman vote to 16,000+ pilots, the very people who the organization represents, provides much more insulation from cronyism than a poll among a couple dozen politicians. We should have a say as to who fills the role of our most prominent representative.
How many reps that voted for DH have been reps for more than 3 terms. How many who voted for the other guy were?
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 06:19 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 1,181
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
How many reps that voted for DH have been reps for more than 3 terms. How many who voted for the other guy were?
Personally, I’m not a fan of the other guy either. Both were long-time insiders with more concern for their own interests than the interests of the pilot group.

Let the entire pilot group vote and the game changes entirely. We’d be more likely to see a wider selection of quality candidates.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 06:25 PM
  #56  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,058
Likes: 200
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
Personally, I’m not a fan of the other guy either. Both were long-time insiders with more concern for their own interests than the interests of the pilot group.

Let the entire pilot group vote and the game changes entirely. We’d be more likely to see a wider selection of quality candidates.
And more candidates we would know nothing about. I’m in favor of debate VIA teams.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 06:41 PM
  #57  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 916
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
Personally, I’m not a fan of the other guy either. Both were long-time insiders with more concern for their own interests than the interests of the pilot group.

Let the entire pilot group vote and the game changes entirely. We’d be more likely to see a wider selection of quality candidates.
Ancman I think your beef is less with the way MEC Chair gets elected and more the unilateral authority they have to settle grievances and how this most recent case went down. In my view making the MEC Chair an even bigger popularity contest solves nothing, and if anything it could invigorate the winner to believe the merit of reaching such status entitles them to make decisions against the will of the MEC. I'd be more interested in further limiting their power rather than giving them justification to consolidate more of it.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 07:12 PM
  #58  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,058
Likes: 200
Default

Originally Posted by myrkridia
Ancman I think your beef is less with the way MEC Chair gets elected and more the unilateral authority they have to settle grievances and how this most recent case went down. In my view making the MEC Chair an even bigger popularity contest solves nothing, and if anything it could invigorate the winner to believe the merit of reaching such status entitles them to make decisions against the will of the MEC. I'd be more interested in further limiting their power rather than giving them justification to consolidate more of it.
The LOA to remove batch sizes should have gone to MEMRAT. Which means we may have actually gotten something for it.
Reply
Old 12-01-2023 | 04:06 AM
  #59  
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,488
Likes: 479
Default

Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
The LOA to remove batch sizes should have gone to MEMRAT. Which means we may have actually gotten something for it.

Agreed that it should have gone to memrat. Still standing by to see what we got in that trade.
Reply
Old 12-01-2023 | 04:42 AM
  #60  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,329
Likes: 818
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by myrkridia
Ancman I think your beef is less with the way MEC Chair gets elected and more the unilateral authority they have to settle grievances and how this most recent case went down. In my view making the MEC Chair an even bigger popularity contest solves nothing, and if anything it could invigorate the winner to believe the merit of reaching such status entitles them to make decisions against the will of the MEC. I'd be more interested in further limiting their power rather than giving them justification to consolidate more of it.
This has long been the issue, unchecked power and authority. P E B!!! was a direct result of an authortarian talking down to the masses. His deal to settle a grievance was the catalyst to the only ever NO vote. He had a God complex, these are the types that seek the position. They need to be kept in check.

Last edited by notEnuf; 12-01-2023 at 04:59 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
flightmedic01
United
31
09-20-2014 07:19 AM
YourFnout
American
29
11-14-2013 08:26 AM
bigtime209
PSA Airlines
205
09-30-2013 11:45 AM
winglet
Mesa Airlines
75
12-24-2009 03:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices