![]() |
Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
(Post 3729733)
UAL had already turned on TI, if that’s who you are referring to. The UAL TA was a disaster, and he lost the support of his own pilot group.
|
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 3729725)
Can you point to an effective leadership model in modern democracies that is insulated from cronyism? What might you propose we try to emulate?
|
Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis
(Post 3729739)
But ANCMAN said it was all about politics and cronyism, so the support of the pilots shouldn’t matter.
|
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3729772)
No system is fully insulated from cronyism. My point was simply that opening the MEC Chairman vote to 16,000+ pilots, the very people who the organization represents, provides much more insulation from cronyism than a poll among a couple dozen politicians. We should have a say as to who fills the role of our most prominent representative.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3729782)
How many reps that voted for DH have been reps for more than 3 terms. How many who voted for the other guy were?
Let the entire pilot group vote and the game changes entirely. We’d be more likely to see a wider selection of quality candidates. |
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3729802)
Personally, I’m not a fan of the other guy either. Both were long-time insiders with more concern for their own interests than the interests of the pilot group.
Let the entire pilot group vote and the game changes entirely. We’d be more likely to see a wider selection of quality candidates. |
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3729802)
Personally, I’m not a fan of the other guy either. Both were long-time insiders with more concern for their own interests than the interests of the pilot group.
Let the entire pilot group vote and the game changes entirely. We’d be more likely to see a wider selection of quality candidates. |
Originally Posted by myrkridia
(Post 3729808)
Ancman I think your beef is less with the way MEC Chair gets elected and more the unilateral authority they have to settle grievances and how this most recent case went down. In my view making the MEC Chair an even bigger popularity contest solves nothing, and if anything it could invigorate the winner to believe the merit of reaching such status entitles them to make decisions against the will of the MEC. I'd be more interested in further limiting their power rather than giving them justification to consolidate more of it.
|
Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
(Post 3729821)
The LOA to remove batch sizes should have gone to MEMRAT. Which means we may have actually gotten something for it.
Agreed that it should have gone to memrat. Still standing by to see what we got in that trade. |
Originally Posted by myrkridia
(Post 3729808)
Ancman I think your beef is less with the way MEC Chair gets elected and more the unilateral authority they have to settle grievances and how this most recent case went down. In my view making the MEC Chair an even bigger popularity contest solves nothing, and if anything it could invigorate the winner to believe the merit of reaching such status entitles them to make decisions against the will of the MEC. I'd be more interested in further limiting their power rather than giving them justification to consolidate more of it.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:58 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands