You know what grinds my gears....
#481
Back in the dark ages we did the WDR at the gate before push. Management thought they could squeeze a few more on-times, and ground minutes, and less weight tolerance if we waited for the actual bag count before generating the WDR. So that "found time" allowed additional weight and schedule efficiency. The routine was to read outloud as soon as recieved, meaning during push because the captain was doing anything. Monitoring yes, but doing nothing. Fast forward and we have come full circle to doing it with the brake set and taking the time. BTW beacon on was what generated the out time so many captains just switched on the becon, did the WDR and then called for push.
#483
For me it's a safetey issue. With the brakes set I know there shouldn't be any uncommanded movement. Personally I couldn't care less when we block out. The on time isn't the trophy a safe comprehensive preflight including boarding and bag loading is. With the new procedures it can be 15 early or 5 late, nobody knows how it will play out to the second until it does. If the FAs need a minute because the door was closed with someone in the lav when the agent rushed to close the door, so be it. Same for me, the ramp, et al. Besides with all the pad on block times and the other pay rules it rarely make a difference on the paystub.
#484
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,017
It's because Delta tracks "latency" as a metric (time from brake release to beginning pushback). Latency and dwell time were all the rage a few years ago.. haven't heard too much lately.
#485
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,623
#486
If they wanted a truly accurate "out" time, it would be based on GPS.
#487
At Big D, I don't even think about it. Odd how paying someone appropriately makes them a safer pilot.
#488
At OO it led to some latency heroes trying to time dropping the brake after giving the push clearance to the tug and try to get it down to the second. I don't know of any actual incidents but I'd be shocked if it didn't lead to some gear/tug damage.
#489
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: B737 FO
Posts: 673
There was a lot of communication about this a few years ago, but basically they want us to be late if we are actually late. The only way they know there's a problem with ramp congestion, push crew availability, etc. is if we leave late, hence don't drop the brake until you have push clearance. I think it's solid policy and something that shows they actually care about running a good operation over the longterm vs. getting the short term ontime 'win' but masking the real problem.
#490
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,920
There was a lot of communication about this a few years ago, but basically they want us to be late if we are actually late. The only way they know there's a problem with ramp congestion, push crew availability, etc. is if we leave late, hence don't drop the brake until you have push clearance. I think it's solid policy and something that shows they actually care about running a good operation over the longterm vs. getting the short term ontime 'win' but masking the real problem.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post