Search

Notices

MBCBP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-2024 | 03:54 PM
  #21  
StoneQOLdCrazy's Avatar
Bent over by buybacks
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 710
Default

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
Ha! Every time I see an MBCBP thread pop up, I know that it’s going to be because something else undesirable was discovered and I have to try my hardest not to drop a “told you so” every time.
Yes. Because the MBCBP has been active for what, six months?? Pretty small sample size. But you've got it all figured out. I'm sure there will be no recessions or major downturns in the coming years, where a less volatile and risky position might come in handy.
Reply
Old 05-18-2024 | 05:29 PM
  #22  
crazyjaydawg's Avatar
Line Holder
10M Airline Miles
15 Years
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 41
From: Middle Seat
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
That entirely out dated, but people keep bringing it up like it’s gospel. Yes, originally a Blackrock fund was going to be used, but it never was actually implemented as they found a way to invest in the proper mix with a lower expense ratio.
Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
But it's a great talking point!
It not entirely outdated. Feel free to DART R&I. You’re right that they invested it outside of LIRIX (fortunately for much smaller fees); however the portfolio almost exactly mirrors LIRIX which has that sweet MSCI ESG rating.

MSCI ESG Fund Ratings, 65% (or 50% for bond funds and money market funds) of the fund’s gross weight must come from securities with ESG coverage by MSCI ESG Research.

So sure, Black Rock would be a tired trope, but at the end of the day pilots’ money is being invested in underperforming assets that place far too much emphasis on ESG. That is simply fact.
Reply
Old 05-18-2024 | 05:56 PM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
It not entirely outdated. Feel free to DART R&I. You’re right that they invested it outside of LIRIX (fortunately for much smaller fees); however the portfolio almost exactly mirrors LIRIX which has that sweet MSCI ESG rating.

MSCI ESG Fund Ratings, 65% (or 50% for bond funds and money market funds) of the fund’s gross weight must come from securities with ESG coverage by MSCI ESG Research.

So sure, Black Rock would be a tired trope, but at the end of the day pilots’ money is being invested in underperforming assets that place far too much emphasis on ESG. That is simply fact.
if the assets were overperforming would anyone care?
Reply
Old 05-18-2024 | 06:02 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 200
Default

Top 9 Holdings (97.49% of Total Assets)

jaydawg- not trying to pick a fight, but a quick google shows the top 9 holdings of LIRIX. None appear to be heavily ESG by design, more of a convenience of holdings if it truly is heavy ESG. IDK 🤷
eg Russel 1000 index isn’t an “ESG” holding per se.
I wouldn’t consider US Intermediate Bond fund ESG either, even though our govt is woke.
Looks like a bunch of indexes to me.


Symbol Company % Assets
BRGKX iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Idx K 23.35%
BIGBX iShares U.S. Intermediate Government Bond Index Fund 19.77%
BISBX iShares US Securitized Bond Index 14.61%
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF 12.28%
BICBX iShares U.S. Intermediate Credit Bond Index Fund 9.16%
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF 7.84%
BLGBX iShares US Long Government Bond Idx 6.09%
BKRDX iShares Developed Real Estate Idx K 2.22%
BLCBX iShares US Long Credit Bond Index 2.17%


Here’s the top holdings of the largest asset of LIRIX, BRGKX

Top 10 Holdings (28.85% of Total Assets)

SymbolCompany% Assets
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation6.39%
AAPL
Apple Inc.5.10%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation4.38%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.3.31%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.2.19%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.1.83%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.1.57%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc.1.56%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company1.34%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.1.18%
Reply
Old 05-18-2024 | 06:36 PM
  #25  
crazyjaydawg's Avatar
Line Holder
10M Airline Miles
15 Years
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 41
From: Middle Seat
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain

Top 9 Holdings (97.49% of Total Assets)

jaydawg- not trying to pick a fight, but a quick google shows the top 9 holdings of LIRIX. None appear to be heavily ESG by design, more of a convenience of holdings if it truly is heavy ESG. IDK 🤷
eg Russel 1000 index isn’t an “ESG” holding per se.
I wouldn’t consider US Intermediate Bond fund ESG either, even though our govt is woke.
Looks like a bunch of indexes to me.


Symbol Company % Assets
BRGKX iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Idx K 23.35%
BIGBX iShares U.S. Intermediate Government Bond Index Fund 19.77%
BISBX iShares US Securitized Bond Index 14.61%
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF 12.28%
BICBX iShares U.S. Intermediate Credit Bond Index Fund 9.16%
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF 7.84%
BLGBX iShares US Long Government Bond Idx 6.09%
BKRDX iShares Developed Real Estate Idx K 2.22%
BLCBX iShares US Long Credit Bond Index 2.17%


Here’s the top holdings of the largest asset of LIRIX, BRGKX

Top 10 Holdings (28.85% of Total Assets)

SymbolCompany% Assets
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation6.39%
AAPL
Apple Inc.5.10%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation4.38%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.3.31%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.2.19%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.1.83%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.1.57%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc.1.56%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company1.34%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.1.18%
No fight, honestly pretty fair discussion. The top 10 of the Russell (BRGKX) mirrors the S&P. That fund has also done really well. It’s the only bright spot there. The ESG rating just needs 50% weight to factor in ESG in a fund that is this bond heavy. I think most govt funds qualify.

The other funds, the bonds really, have been complete trash. The BIGBX has returned a whopping .96% since inception. That’s better than most other bond funds which have been consistently losing money since the pandemic.

I guess we don’t need to turn this into a bond vs equity or investment risk discussion, but I don’t understand how so many people that are critical of US fiscal policy (and many others) still turn around and put their money somewhere that is heavy on US govt bonds.

Bonds have a time and place in portfolios, but I just don’t see the value in US govt bonds right now. I mean that from both a performance standpoint and ESG.
Reply
Old 05-18-2024 | 07:11 PM
  #26  
Jughead135's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 2
From: Hates Commuting
Default

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
My planning said that I needed >8% annually to beat simply investing 401(k) excess in a brokerage account.
Show your math, please….
Reply
Old 05-18-2024 | 09:26 PM
  #27  
Gunfighter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
1M Airline Miles
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,644
Likes: 673
Default

Thread summary:
My decision to chose X was better than your choice of Y. For supporting evidence let me submit a list of reasons irrelevant to your situation why my choice was better.


​​​​​


​​​​​
Reply
Old 05-18-2024 | 09:38 PM
  #28  
O R C A's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 32
Likes: 10
From: 220
Default

“It’s a proprietary formula. I can’t go into great detail” Bernard Madoff


If I just blow this money think it was a bad return? It concerns me how many think they pay zero taxes on this money talking about being 35% ahead from the start.
Reply
Old 05-19-2024 | 03:50 AM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 229
Likes: 12
Default

I like that I don’t have to actively deal with receiving the money as cash, pay the highest marginal taxes on it in my highest earning years, every other week having to transfer the cash to an investment account, managing investments, and every time I consider a trade dealing with tax planning on unrealized gains. Maybe I’d end up with a few more shekels if I took this approach, but I’d rather not have it all in the orbit of my mind for multiple decades of my life.

Much like the pilots who retired with a full pension. I bet they never once worried about the ESG exposure of the pension fund. However, unlike the pension, an aggressive management team cannot steal this money.

After we raised the bar to 18% DC, SWA knocked it out of the park and raised it further to 20%. It’s a foregone conclusion we get 20% in the next contract. At that level of contribution, any pilot should be able to set their 401k allocations into a few solid index funds as a new hire, and let the MBCBP churn on autopilot and end up with a very comfortable retirement 30 years later with zero effort. Remember, the investment allocation of the MBCBP is negotiable as well, and I fully expect it will improve in the next round of negotiations.

This should be the goal of a collectively bargained retirement benefit. Set and forget, and spend your time off enriching your life in other ways.

Just my opinion only.


As the late great philosopher said- breathe in, breathe out, move on.

Everyone had their choice and they made it.
Reply
Old 05-19-2024 | 04:02 AM
  #30  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,373
Likes: 1,396
Default

Originally Posted by First Break
...

After we raised the bar to 18% DC, SWA knocked it out of the park and raised it further to 20%. It’s a foregone conclusion we get 20% in the next contract. ...
How did I miss that?

That said, much like UA having First Class DH, I'm not sure that us raising DC to 20% is a foregone conclusion.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LeineLodge
Delta
39
05-14-2024 04:44 AM
UGBSM
Delta
176
01-25-2024 07:03 AM
Bucking Bar
Delta
395
11-18-2022 05:36 AM
Richard Head
Delta
8
01-28-2020 11:02 AM
PilotWombat
Delta
18
01-27-2020 10:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices